- Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

Status of Boost GSoC 2019?
by Mateusz Loskot 24 Jan '19

24 Jan '19

Hi, (I've asked this David Bellot by email some time ago. No response arrived, so asking here again.) One student asked about GSoC recently [1] but w/o answer. An empty repo for this year has been created. And, the timeline [3] says organizations need to apply by Feb 6. I wonder, what is the status of the preparation for GSoC 2019? [1] https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2019/01/244849.php [2] https://github.com/BoostGSoC19 [3] https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works/ Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net <http://mateusz.loskot.net>

1 0

[stacktrace] libbacktrace callback for backtrace_pcinfo invalid return value
by Muazin Mugadr 24 Jan '19

24 Jan '19

Hello all See also: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54333608/boost-stacktrace-not-demanglin… I am cross compiling boost on Unix for Windows with MINGW. I am using libbacktrace compiled using the same toolchain from here: https://github.com/ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace Digging through the code of libbacktrace I was able to deduce that in a success case the return value of backtrace_pcinfo will be the return value of the callback supplied to that function (for DWARF search). The callback boost is giving looks like this: inline int libbacktrace_full_callback(void *data, uintptr_t /*pc*/, const char *filename, int lineno, const char *function) { pc_data& d = *static_cast<pc_data*>(data); if (d.filename && filename) { *d.filename = filename; } if (d.function && function) { *d.function = function; } d.line = lineno; return 0; } As you can see it will always return 0. This causes an issue with the way the function is called: ::backtrace_pcinfo:( state, reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(addr), boost::stacktrace::detail::libbacktrace_full_callback, boost::stacktrace::detail::libbacktrace_error_callback, &data ) || ::backtrace_syminfo:( state, reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(addr), boost::stacktrace::detail::libbacktrace_syminfo_callback, boost::stacktrace::detail::libbacktrace_error_callback, &data ); If the symbol is found using backtrace_pcinfo the return value will be 0. If its not found it will be 0. It will always use the value provided by backtrace_syminfo. Is this intended? BR Cromon

1 0

Tests: Runtime type_mismatch after upgrade to 1.69
by Florian Lindner 24 Jan '19

24 Jan '19

Hello, after my distribution rolled out the upgrade to Boost 1.69 I am unable to compile my application anymore. I try to get the log_level set. Minimal compiling example: #define BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK #include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> #include <boost/test/unit_test_parameters.hpp> bool init_unit_test() { using namespace boost::unit_test; auto logLevel = runtime_config::get<log_level>(runtime_config::btrt_log_level); return true; } int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { int retCode = boost::unit_test::unit_test_main( &init_unit_test, argc, argv ); return retCode; } which compiles fine g++ -std=c++11 -lboost_unit_test_framework boosttesting.cpp but gives an runtime error: % ./a.out Test setup error: boost::runtime::arg_type_mismatch: Access with invalid type for argument corresponding to parameter log_level Thanks! Florian

1 0

C++Now 2019 Registration is Open
by Jon Kalb 24 Jan '19

24 Jan '19

Boosters, Registration for C++Nows 2019 (aka BoostCon) is now open: http://cppnow.org/announcements/2019/01/2019-registration-is-open/ Please help us to spread the word about this announcement. Thanks. Note that the Aspen Meadows Resort online registration link is also up on the lodging page. Because there will be another group in the hotel, we’ve been allocated fewer rooms this year. Please either reserve a room very soon or plan to stay at the Lamplighter or another hotel in town. See you in Aspen in May. Jon

1 0

[gsoc19][GIL] Project proposal
by Miral Shah 23 Jan '19

23 Jan '19

Hello everyone, I am Miral Shah a computer engineering student from India. I have been talking with Boost.GIL community on GIL's Gitter channel since last few weeks to come up with the new idea for GSoC19. After many suggestions and a long discussion on various ideas with the contributors, we have come up with the idea to expand the GIL by introducing new image processing algorithms into it. I would also like to thank Stefan Seefeld and Mateusz Loskot for their guidance and support. Proposal idea can be found here: https://github.com/boostorg/gil/wiki/GSoC-2019 Thank you, Miral Shah

1 0

Boost log issues and workarounds
by hh h 21 Jan '19

21 Jan '19

Hi, I like the boost log, but there are many small issues, appreciate your kind help: I followed the following link to use a good macro LOG: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35895199/boost-log-and-severity-local-a… But calling LOG(error) caused much trouble for the name space collision, alternative is to use full namespace boost::log::trivial::error, but that is too cumbersome,I tried to use an uppercase ERROR to replace it in an enum ERROR = boost::log::trivial::error, obviously that could not be complied, although it is defined as enum severity_level in trivial.hpp, it does not look like the boost::log::trivial::error is an enum value. Any workarounds? Another issue from that link is it has to call LOGGABLE prior to call LOG(error) in each function, that makes more clumsy, software developers in my team are not happy about it. Any workaround to have a fixed argument in BOOST_LOG_STREAM_WITH_PARAMS, without need to claim boost::log::sources::severity_logger<boost::log::trivial::severity_level> slg; in each function? You guys are genius that must be a way to do it, appreciate your advice. Thank you

4 22

[lockfree] wait-free multi-queue?
by Shawn Yarbrough 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

Is it practical to have a wait-free, multi-producer/multi-consumer queue? I ask because Boost's Lockfree multi-queue is only advertised as being "lock-free". (Boost does offer a wait-free single-queue.) https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_69_0/doc/html/lockfree.html Shawn Y.

2 1

Re: [boost] [parameter] Helping user libraries adjust to recent changes in GitHub develop branch
by Cromwell Enage 17 Jan '19

17 Jan '19

Happy New Year, everyone! > I've been contributing upgrades to Boost.Parameter functionality > and documentation in the GitHub develop branch for the past > couple of months. These upgrades include the addition of code > generation macros for Boost.Parameter-enabled function call > operators and support for perfect forwarding, and more upgrades > are yet to come. It's been an enjoyable experience so far, > but understandably there are some growing pains. I've taken > pains to ensure that as long as user libraries access only the > public interface of Boost.Parameter, they won't be affected by > the changes. However, there are several notable libraries that > currently use non-public portions of Boost.Parameter, so > whenever possible I've submitted PRs to those libraries that > either change the usage to access only public portions > (preferred) or make quick fixes (temporary). Update: As of this writing, I have active PRs for the following libraries: Boost.Accumulators Boost.Convert Boost.Graph Boost.Log AFAIK, these are the libraries most directly affected by the changes. To reiterate: I'm willing to help the library maintainers resolve these issues as quickly as possible. I should be able to answer any questions you have about the changes to Boost.Parameter. Cromwell D. Enage

3 2

[histogram] discussion of accessor interface design
by Hans Dembinski 15 Jan '19

15 Jan '19

Dear all, work on boost.histogram is progressing fast. I am still implementing feedback from the review, simplifying the interface, adding requested features, such as axes that can grow. STL compatibility was further improved, you can now also write to histograms via iterators. The normal iterators make sense when you iterate over a 1D histogram. When you iterate over a multi-dimensional histogram, you also want to know the current multi-dimensional index. After considering many options, and I really thought about this a lot, I went for the following design, which is a bit unusual. Therefore I would appreciate feedback. I think it is great, once you overcome an initial feeling of awkwardness. The accessor class is "polymorphic", it behaves like a pointer to the histogram value, and like an array for the multi-dimensional index. In code, this is how you use it: auto h = make_histogram(…) // make 2D histogram for (auto && x : indexed(h)) { // indexed produces a range of accessors // x is a special accessor type, combining two non-overlapping concepts // - it acts like a pointer to the histogram value // - it acts like an array to the current index std::cout << "current value " << *x << std::endl; // "dereference" to get value std::cout << "current index " << x[0] << " " << x[1] << std::endl; // use subscript operator to get index } This syntax is beautifully terse, e.g. see https://github.com/HDembinski/histogram/blob/develop/examples/guide_access_… for a full example, especially line 66. Pros: - really terse - you can access methods on the pointee with x->method() as well! (useful when histogram counters are not PODs) - you can iterate over x to get the indices, for (auto i : x) { … } works - since x acts like an array to the indices, you can pass it to functions which accept ranges or iterators (it has .begin() and .end()) - x can be (and is) enhanced with other useful methods * x.bin(N) returns the current bin interval for the N-th axis, allowing you to access the central value, width, edges * x.density() returns the current density (bin value divided by product of current bin widths) Cons: - *x and x[0] do completely different things: *x gives you the bin value, x[0] gives you the first index The last point is, of course, where people have a problem. But if you take C++ concepts seriously then the accessor is a perfect model of a pointer and a perfect model of an array. These two roles are non-overlapping and they have non-overlapping sets of interfaces, which I exploit here. If you have the expectation that *x and x[0] should do the same thing, it is so because of C. C has no extensive type system like C++ and does not distinguish between arrays and pointers, although these are very different concepts. A pointer points to a value, and an array is a collection of values. "dereferencing" a collection of values makes no sense, we are just used to it because of our C heritage. C++ has a better type system, and better classes for pointers and arrays than raw pointers. The stdlib authors recognize that *x has no meaning when x is a sequence of values. *x fails when x is a std::vector, std::deque, std::list, or any kind of collection in the stdlib. Even for std::unique_ptr, they made sure that the interfaces for the pointer-to-object and pointer-to-array specializations behave differently: ``` #include <memory> int main() { std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int); // pointer version // p[0]; // fails *p; // OK std::unique_ptr<int[]> a(new int[3]); // array version // *a; // fails a[0]; // OK } ``` Once you accept that the two concepts of pointers and arrays have non-overlapping interfaces in C++, it becomes possible to make a combined object which has both interfaces, and uses these two sets to return different information. If you have read this far, I hope your initial reaction of "woah, this looks really inconsistent and confusing!" turned to "hmm, maybe it is not inconsistent after all". I am looking forward to hear your thoughts. Best regards, Hans PS: The alternative would be to return a std::pair<index_type, value_reference_type>, but this has disadvantages. Unpacking the pair is going be nice in C++17 with structured bindings, but not so much in C++14. Also, it prevents me from adding convenience methods, like the above-mentioned bin(N) and density() methods.

1 0

boost log to concatenate just one log file
by hh h 15 Jan '19

15 Jan '19

Hi, I added boost::log::keywords::open_mode = std::ios_base::app to the log configuration, but it did not stop log file proliferation, every time I started the program, it created a new log file mylog.log0000x, how can I stop creating new logs? Thank you.

2 2