- Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

Re: [boost] [boost::spirit::basic_hold_any] needs non template operator=
by Hartmut Kaiser 20 Aug '13

20 Aug '13

> I found that hold_any template operator= is not used during assignment to > another hold_any (as intended by its developer). Instead compiler uses > self generated version of operator= which doesn't forward to assign(const > basic_hold_any&). This leads to memory corruption. > The fix is simple - you need to add explicit operator=(const > basic_hold_any&). > My compiler is gcc 4.4.7 and I use option -std=c++0x Version of boost is > 1.53 but I don't see that something changed in 1.54 so it should have the > same issue. Please provide a patch which I will gladly apply. Regards Hartmut --------------- http://boost-spirit.com http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu

1 0

[thread] Dividing into Boost.Thread and Boost.Sync
by Andrey Semashev 20 Aug '13

20 Aug '13

Hi, In our private conversation Vicente J. Botet Escriba, Tim Blechmann and myself have formed a proposal to split the current Boost.Thread library into two libraries: Boost.Thread and Boost.Sync. The former will retain its thread management features, such as thread class, futures and TLS. The latter will contain all thread synchronization components, such as: - locks - mutexes - condition variables - call_once Mutexes and condition variables in Boost.Sync will not support thread interruption and will be as simple and lightweight as possible. For example, one of the benefits I'd like to achieve with this is that synchronization primitives should become decoupled from the timing libraries. I'm not sure we'll be able to make the whole library header-only, but we will try to. If some component is header-only, it will not require linking to Boost.Sync. We plan to add new components to Boost.Sync after the extraction is made. The current candidates for addition are: - spin_mutex and yield_spin_mutex. There are several implementations in Boost, namely in Boost.SmartPtr, Boost.Log and Boost.Atomic. The plan is to refine them into two flavors of spin mutex and move to Boost.Sync and then switch these libraries to the common implementation, if possible. - once blocks from Boost.Log. - portable Windows-style events. There is a prototype implementation in Boost.Log. Boost.Thread will depend on Boost.Sync and will retain headers and possible glue code for backward compatibility. For instance, I think it will have to implement interruptible condition variable. Comments are welcome.

6 17

[serialization] Portable binary archive
by Renato Forti 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

Hi All, I am using boost serialization to transfer files, because of portability, I am using: boost::archive::text_oarchive boost::archive::text_iarchive But in testing I've done, it seems to quadruple the size of the file! I saw it in serialization test folder: boost_1_54_0/libs/serialization/example 4 files to work in binary mode (that are very more efficient way): portable_binary_iarchive.cpp (hpp) portable_binary_oarchive.cpp (hpp) My Question: Why not this files are on the library? Anyone ever used them in production? Are safe? How to use? How build serialization lib with these files? I need change bjam of serialization to include these files? One more question: Someone has used Google Protocol Buffer? Could compare with boost serialization? <https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/> https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ Thanks

1 0

Request to allow contribution to Boost.Multiprecision cpp_bin_float
by Jyotesh Choudhari 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

I would like to contribute to the development of Boost.Multiprecision cpp_bin_float library. Can I work on it? If yes, then how can I start? Thanks and regards, Jyotesh Choudhari

3 2

[asio] how to limit speed of tcp socket on asio?
by Renato Forti 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

Hi All, Anyone can help-me! I want know if have some way to limit speed of tcp socket on asio? For sample if my app open a socket and start to send a file to my server! How to limit upload speed? If I want limit to 100kb/s, have any way? Anyone have any idea: how I can achieves this? Thanks

2 1

Re: [boost] [cpo-proposal] presentation of the idea
by Santiago Tapia 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:00:57 +0200 > From: Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen(a)dezide.com> >> int main(int argc, char** argv) >> { >> classifier<base, std::allocator> collection; >> >> collection.insert( derived_A(21) ); >> collection.insert( derived_B(40) ); >> >> classifier<base, std::allocator>::iterator i, e = collection.end(); >> >> for ( i = collection.begin(); i != e; ++i ) >> { >> const base& x = *i; >> std::cout << x.do_something(6) << std::endl; >> } >> >> return 0; >> } > > I would like to see the use of forwrding in-place construction: > > collection.push_back<derived_A>( 21 ); > > using variadic templates. OK, I will try. > >> - The container's name is classifier because it classifies objects >> internally using the RTTI. > > I had similar ideas that I wanted to implement. I didn't expect to use > RTTI. Basically I wanted the class hierarchy's base class to derive from > a class with pure virtual functions that allowed the container to > perform the inplace-contruction, copying and alignment stuff. I am trying to make the interface of the container as easy as possible. I think using RTTI is an easy solution. > >> - The container classifier is _not_ a sequence. > > I would expect the container to allow forward iteration. I assume you > mean that erase/insert into the middle is prohibited? I imagined that > only push_back/pop_back was supported. > >> - The classifier uses continuous storage in memory for objects of the >> same type, therefore it is expected to improve cache efficiency with respect >> to solutions that use pointers (and new to allocate objects), especially if the >> client code uses some cache-aware allocator. > > I wanted to call my class template polymorphic_vector, taking base class > and allocator template arguments. I imagined that the storage > would be completely contigious, even when many different types of > objects where stored into the container. This would give maximum cache > efficiency. Then if the user wanted to sort or otherwise manipulate the > sequence, he could just create an std::vector<T*> of the elements > (Thus, push_back should probably return a pointer to the constructed > element). I am thinking about including that std:vector<T*> internally in another container, thus, I could provide a random access iterator. That could be "sequence_classifier". But I see a problem: if we only sort the vector<T*> then the objects in memory of consecutive iterations will not be contigous in memory and we will lose some of the cache efficiency. I will try to provide another kind of iteration, actually a two-levels iteration, like in a matrix, in order to gain access to the vectors of objects. That way we might sort objects of the same type without drawbacks. > > All in all, I hope you will persue this idea. I certainly have many > use-cases for it in code where efficiency matters, and in code where > using Boost.Intrusive is just must more work. > > kind regards > > Thorsten > Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:20:36 -0500 > From: Larry Evans <cppljevans(a)suddenlink.net> >> Yes, that is the idea. Actually, whether the implementation uses a collection >> of vectors or other mechanism is an implementation detail. I use a map >> of vectors in the classifier container, but I will try other implementations. > Is the map key something like the type_info: > > http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/typeinfo/ Yes, actually a wrapper of typeinfo because of a problem with typeinfo I could not workaround. But that is an implementation detail, I mean, that will be an inner detail of the library and I might find a better solution without changing the interface of the classifier container. > > If there is a separate vector for each type, then the storage for a > container containing more than one type can't be contiguous, > since the vectors for the containers for the types cannot be > contiguous, or am I missing something? I think what Thorsten > was aiming at in this post: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/243504 I could not follow the link... ? > > was each element in the container was truly contiguous. IOW, > given a container, c, then. > > c.insert(T1()); > c.insert(T2()); > > The T1 inserted into c would be contigous with the T2. No, in the prototype of the classifier T1 will not be contigous with T2, but: c.insert(T2()); c.insert(T2()); first object of T2 will be contigous with second object of T2. > > [snip] >>> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:33:25 +0400 >>> From: Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com> >>>> >>>> - The container classifier is _not_ a sequence. >>> >>> Why? Is this intentional? >> >> Both intentional and accidental, because I want to allocate objects >> contiguously in memory I have to store them in a collection of >> vectors, the container is not a sequence but a collection of sequences, >> one sequence for every class in the classifier. >> I will implement a sequence, but later. >> > > The above reinforces my above conclusion that T1 and T2 elements > cannot be contiguous in the container. A container might store T1 and T2 contigously, but up to now, that is not my idea, because it is more difficult and I am not sure about the efficiency of that alternative. Actually, I have read somewhere that there is a cache memory for functions, in that case, classifying the objects by type could be a good implementation because the virtual methods could be stored in the cache until the objects of that type were finished. > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:12:48 -0400 > From: Rob Stewart <robertstewart(a)comcast.net> > To: "boost(a)lists.boost.org" <boost(a)lists.boost.org> > Subject: Re: [boost] [cpo-proposal] presentation of the idea > > On Aug 16, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Santiago Tapia <santiago.tapia(a)upm.es> wrote: > >>> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:33:25 +0400 >>> From: Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev(a)gmail.com> >>> >>>> - The allocator argument in the classifier will be applied to every object added to the classifier. Thus, the allocator is provided without its argument. The std::allocator is the default argument. >>> >>> You can use the standard interface for allocator rebinding: >>> >>> typedef allocator<T> allocator_T; >>> typedef typename allocator_T::template rebind<U>::other allocator_U; >>> >>> You can use std::allocator<void> by default then. >> >> I am not sure how to do this. I need a allocator with a parameter in order to get: allocator<triangle>, allocator<square>, ... this allocator must be instantiated when an object of a new class is inserted in the classifier. > > That's the point of rebind. Starting with allocator<A>, you can get allocator<B>. The spelling of allocator<B> just looks odd: > > typename allocator<A> template ::rebind<B>::other > > ___ > Rob > Understood, thank you both for the comment. > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 09:20:14 -0500 > From: Larry Evans <cppljevans(a)suddenlink.net> > > The attached demonstrates, I believe, what Thorsten was aiming at > an shows the storage of *different* types in contiguous storage. > > HTH. > > > -regards, > Larry > >

3 2

[AFIO] AFIO Proposed feature Voting announcement
by Paul Kirth 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

Hello Boost-dev and Boost-users, I’m Paul Kirth, and I am the student working on the upcoming AFIO library this summer as part of GSoC. As of last week AFIO is fully ported to Boost and is now building cleanly on all of the last three major releases of the three most popular C++ compilers. Niall Douglas, my mentor for AFIO, has previously mentioned on the list that we would be asking for your feedback regarding which new features would be most beneficial to the Boost community. We would like to accommodate you all, but with GSoC being limited in time and ending in just one month’s time now, we’re going to limit the current additions to the top 3 most requested features. I plan to stay involved with AFIO for as long as I am able, so I’m sure many more of these features can be supported by AFIO in the future. I have set up a voting site on https://boostafio.uservoice.com to help with the voting. You may vote 10 times as you see fit, and you can give more (or all!) votes to those features you prefer the most. You may also add additional features not currently up for voting, so we encourage you to read the whole list of proposed additions before adding your own. Try to be descriptive with your feature request including a rationale, as not everyone involved with Boost may have the same expertise as you do. Including an example of how this feature would useful will help make a good case for your feature request, and help voters identify what is important. Finally, if you are not familiar with AFIO, we encourage you to take a look at our documentation at https://ci.nedprod.com/view/All/job/Boost.AFIO%20Build%20Documentation/Boos…. A link is also present on the voting site for your convenience. Additionally you will find our project on github at https://github.com/BoostGSoC/boost.afio, if you wish to dive into the source code for yourself. Voting is open right now, so please be sure to vote before the voting period ends on 8/23/13 at 11:59 PM GMT-8:00. We look forward to seeing which features are most important to the community, and hope to meet your expectations. Quick list of the features already proposed: Directory Monitoring Support Permissions and ACL Support Support for Boost Iostreams Improve Formal Closure Execution Engine Support Asynchronous Directory Enumeration Memory Mapped File Support Support for STL Iostreams Linux Kernel AIO Backend POSIX aio_* Asynchronous I/O Backend -- Paul Kirth

1 0

[Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal
by Geoff Shannon 18 Aug '13

18 Aug '13

I emailed the list a while ago that I was starting to work on a named pipe implementation for potential inclusion in the Boost.Interprocess library, and now I finally have some concrete evidence of progress. I've come up with a header file for my proposed interface and I would really appreciate any and all feedback on it. Particularly, I'm interested in ideas for an appropriate replacement for using char *'s as the data buffers for reading and writing. As a point of interest this interface is meant to be extremely simple. I don't intend to initially support ANYTHING except for basic creation and reading and writing. Thanks! -- Geoff Nothing is ever easy.

9 36

about bessel function
by llwaeva＠gmail.com 17 Aug '13

17 Aug '13

Hi all, I am testing the bessel function boost::math::cyl_bessel_j in gnu compiler with boost 1.51.0, I am testing boost::math::cyl_bessel_j(2000, 0.9) boost::math::cyl_bessel_j(4000, 0.9) the first one give zero but the second one gives infinity while it should give zero also. I wonder why it doesn't work when the order is bigger than 4000?

2 1

Re: [boost] [Interprocess] Named pipe interface proposal
by John Venarchick 15 Aug '13

15 Aug '13

> > > > I would URGE you to make this exclusively a Boost.ASIO implementation. > > I also agree, an ASIO implementation is the way to go with this. > > 3. There seemed to be some confusion regarding named pipes on POSIX. > > > The only difference between Windows and POSIX named pipes is that the > > > former use the NT kernel namespace, within which the filing systems > > > are mount points, whereas the latter use the filing system namespace > > > directly. In my own code, I use a magic directory in /tmp as the > > > namespace for all my named pipes in the system in an attempt to > > > replicate a similar behavior to Windows, but there are many other ways > > > of doing the same thing. > > > > > > > Hmmm, I see what you're saying and I agree with it, but I'm also not sure > that > > it's strictly true that this is the "only" difference. > also a +1 to using POSIX pipes instead of domain sockets. I don't think you'd need to copy Niall's /tmp/ magic directory or if so make that an option. > > Also, FYI, I'm doing this project as an independent study through my CS > program. > > I'm getting close to the end of the quarter and I need to have something > > concrete to show for my efforts. Since I've already started down the > path > of > > implementing this not inside of Boost.ASIO, for the purposes of my school > > project I'm going to continue with that. However, I plan to continue > working on > > it after the scholastic bit is finished, and then I would be interested > in > > implementing it as part of ASIO. > > That's pretty cool as a CS project. I hope you get a good grade. I've done far too much with Windows pipes and would definitely like to see an ASIO interface if not just to replace what I'm doing now. -John V

1 0