March 2019 - Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

Regarding project idea for GSOC 2019
by Syed Souban 04 Mar '19

04 Mar '19

Hi guys! I am a machine learning enthusiast looking forward to work in implementing some machine learning algorithms in c++ as a gsoc 2019 project. I know that a similar project has been done last year. So in a way I want to extend to that idea. I needed some suggestions and or pointers on which algorithms are feasible to implement. Regards, Souban

2 1

(no subject)
by Roopkatha Samanta 04 Mar '19

04 Mar '19

I want to contribute to boost C++-Python integration project for my GSoC 2019 project.

1 0

[Boost.Intrusive]
by PREET THAKKAR 03 Mar '19

03 Mar '19

I am a 2nd year computer science student. I want to contribute to Boost.Intrusive as part of GSoC '19. I have some ideas to enhance Boost.Intrusive and also add more features to previous year's project in Intrusive. I am new to Boost. Any help regarding getting started with the library would be appreciated. Regards, Preet Thakkar

2 1

Re: [boost] Review request for variant2, review manager wanted
by Peter Dimov 03 Mar '19

03 Mar '19

> If anyone would like to step forward to manage the review, please do. Michael Caisse was the first to graciously offer his services (via Slack) and I'll be glad to have him manage the review. Thanks to Niall who also volunteered. :-) With respect to Niall's request for compile time and run time measurements, I've added a benchmark https://github.com/pdimov/variant2/blob/develop/benchmark/benchmark1.cpp and the results from compiling and running it on my machine are at https://github.com/pdimov/variant2/blob/develop/benchmark/benchmark1.md This is not a cherry-picked example that makes variant2 look good, so it loses to std::variant here and there. :-)

7 13

Runtime code generation
by VIKRAM LODHI 03 Mar '19

03 Mar '19

I am trying to write a grammar based code but can't seems to find starting point. Is there anything I should go through first. Grammar based . All the functions are written in string formats by user and parsed into binary at runtime and are able to use that function.

1 0

[release][multi_index] Permission to merge to master
by Joaquin M López Muñoz 03 Mar '19

03 Mar '19

I'm asking permission to merge the following fairly trivial changes to master: https://github.com/boostorg/multi_index/compare/bbb915bd344463ba767aebe7988… Travis and AppVeyor tests are passing. BTW, the conditions for allowed commits at this release stage ("closed for major changes") are not clear to me. Do I really need to ask for permission if the change (as is this case) is deemed minor? Joaquín M López Muñoz

2 4

Re: [boost] [Boost-testing] Running regression tests for msvc-14.2 (preview)
by Tom Kent 02 Mar '19

02 Mar '19

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:13 AM Mateusz Loskot via Boost-Testing < boost-testing(a)lists.boost.org> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 14:02, Tom Kent via Boost-Testing > <boost-testing(a)lists.boost.org> wrote: > > I was hoping to start running regression tests for the upcoming Visual > Studio 2019 (toolset 14.2) and got stumped by an issue. > > I've set a user-config.jam: > > using msvc : 14.2 ; > > Is this toolset even supported? > > As I explained in > https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2019/02/245143.php, > I had to 'fake' it as 14.1 in project-config.jam: > > using msvc : 14.1 : "C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual > > Studio\\2019\\Preview\\VC\\Tools\\MSVC\\14.20.27323\\bin\\HostX64\\x64\\cl.exe" > I was able to get the regression tests to run using this workaround in user-config.jam. Here's what the config_info is: https://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/teeks99-te… I'm disappointed that we can't have general support for future versions of msvc. We don't seem to have this problem with pre-release versions of GCC/Clang. https://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/teeks99-02… Tom

3 5

Gsoc 2019 Boost.GIL project
by fady faragallah 02 Mar '19

02 Mar '19

Hi,I am fady faragallah 4th year student at faculty of computer engineering. I am interested in Boost.GIL and would like to contribute to the project. I have good experience in C++ programming and image processing algorithms and I am currently working on image processing and deep learning projects using convolutional neural networks. I need to know where I can deliver the competency test and how to contact the mentors. Thanks

1 0

Interested in working on Boost.GIL
by AvZ NaV 01 Mar '19

01 Mar '19

Hello, I am Arnav Tiwari, a sophomore year undergraduate student of IIT Kharagpur. I am interested in working on Boost.GIL. I have prior experience in image processing and C++ so I feel I will be able to pick up the project and get to work quickly. I would really appreciate it if someone can point me in the right direction to get started. I hope I'm not spamming the mailing list, apologies if that is the case. -- Regards, Arnav Tiwari

2 1

Re: [boost] [variant2] Need rationale for never-empty guarantee
by Nikita Kniazev 01 Mar '19

01 Mar '19

> This reply actually addresses my question: visitation on boost::variant2 is > faster than on std::variant because it does not have to account for the > valueless state. I would not expect perfomance differences on CPUs with branch predictor or if visitation translated into jump table (variant uses switch for this?). > For example, resizing a std::vector implements the strong guarantee that > state will be restored to before the resize if an exception is thrown in > the middle of the resize. Probably one should use different container type if a data types move/copy can throw. There even a vector implementation that will not copy/move on resize https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ke1mJiGO-pU (for CPU with virtual memory).

1 0