March 2018 - Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

Re: [boost] [gsoc18] Project Proposal for uBLAS - Add statistics and machine learning functions
by Arun Ramachandran 25 Mar '18

25 Mar '18

Hello, Just dropping a reminder regarding my proposal. I'd really appreciate any comments and suggestions for improvements anyone might have! I'm unsure of whether I've been specific enough while describing the interfaces to the proposed functionality, so if anyone feels I should flesh out my proposal a bit more, I'll gladly do so. Thank you, Arun Ramachandran On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Arun Ramachandran <ramachandran.arun(a)outlook.com<mailto:ramachandran.arun@outlook.com>> wrote: Hello, I've written a proposal for precanned idea 1 of uBLAS (add statistics and machine learning functions) and submitted a draft on the GSoC website. I'd greatly appreciate any comments on the proposal. ‌ Thank you, Arun Ramachandran

2 1

[gsoc18] Boost.uBLAS support for tensors: seeking a mentor
by Лясота Костя 25 Mar '18

25 Mar '18

Hello, My name is Konstantin. I would like to add tensor support to boost library. I am an aspirant (1st year) in computer science from Moscow Technological University, Russia (I believe aspirant corresponds to PhD Student in USA), and I have taken extra tensor algebra and differential geometry courses. My motivation, besides my affection towards topology and tensors, comes from the fact that I need C++ tensor library for use in my own project. Since I'm going to implement it, I would like to see it as a part of great open source project like Boost that anyone can use. Â I have completed a competency test: [1]http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/5cf1908494c2da5d Due to some circumstances I had to do that in web ide, but I should be able to send it in separate .h and .cpp files directly via email if needed. Â I'm sorry I applied so late, but I found out about gsoc only yesterday. I should note that I'm willing to implement this even not as gsoc student, so contact me if you're interested. References 1. http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/5cf1908494c2da5d

2 1

[gsoc18] Working on my proposal for Boost.Geometry project.
by Abhinav 25 Mar '18

25 Mar '18

Hi everyone, This is a draft of my proposal for Boost.Geometry. Proposal.pdf <http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/file/t371389/Proposal.pdf> Please take a look at it and share your opinion about how I could improve it. Thanks in advance for your time and effort. Regards. Thanks in advance Abhinav Siddharth -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html

2 3

Re: [boost] [gsoc18] Project Proposal for uBLAS - Add statistics and machine learning functions
by Arun Ramachandran 25 Mar '18

25 Mar '18

Hello, Just dropping a reminder regarding my proposal. I'd really appreciate any comments and suggestions for improvements anyone might have! I'm unsure of whether I've been specific enough while describing the interfaces to the proposed functionality, so if anyone feels I should flesh out my proposal a bit more, I'll gladly do so. Thank you, Arun Ramachandran On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Arun Ramachandran <ramachandran.arun(a)outlook.com<mailto:ramachandran.arun@outlook.com>> wrote: Hello, I've written a proposal for precanned idea 1 of uBLAS (add statistics and machine learning functions) and submitted a draft on the GSoC website. I'd greatly appreciate any comments on the proposal. ‌ Thank you, Arun Ramachandran

1 0

[GSoC18] proposal
by Rajat Miglani 25 Mar '18

25 Mar '18

Hello, I am Rajat Miglani,I had been in contact with my mentor (Damian Vicino) regarding the project Boost.SafeFloat. I have submitted my draft proposal on the Google and would like someone to review it. Thanks, Rajat Miglani

1 0

[GSoC 2018] A question on the wording of a background question of the proposal template
by philectron 25 Mar '18

25 Mar '18

Hello, >From Boost submission template, https://svn.boost.org/trac10/wiki/SoCSubmissionTemplate, I'm a little confused by the wording of the following question: "What are your plans beyond this Summer of Code time frame for your proposed work?" So, does this question ask about how much time I'll spend on my proposed project besides the GSoC expected timeframe, or does it ask about my plans for some projects other than this GSoC project? Thanks, Phi -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html

1 0

[gsoc18] Project Proposal for uBLAS - Add statistics and machine learning functions
by Arun Ramachandran 24 Mar '18

24 Mar '18

Hello, I've written a proposal for precanned idea 1 of uBLAS (add statistics and machine learning functions) and submitted a draft on the GSoC website. I'd greatly appreciate any comments on the proposal. ‌ Thank you, Arun Ramachandran

1 0

[gsoc18] Project Proposal for uBLAS - Add statistics and machine learning functions
by Arun Ramachandran 24 Mar '18

24 Mar '18

Hello, I've written a proposal for precanned idea 1 of uBLAS (add statistics and machine learning functions) and submitted a draft on the GSoC website. I'd greatly appreciate any comments on the proposal. ‌ Thank you, Arun Ramachandran

1 0

Re: [boost] [cmake] Where to discuss CMake in Boost?
by Mateusz Loskot 24 Mar '18

24 Mar '18

On 23 March 2018 at 10:37, Paul A. Bristow via Boost <boost(a)lists.boost.org> wrote: >> Mateusz Loskot via Boost >>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, 00:13 P F, <pfultz2(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> I was completely unaware of the boost-cmake ML >>> >> >> It seems a bit hidden from the front page, one has to browse lists.boost.org >> for full list of MLs. > > A bit of judicious selective cross-posting to the user or developer lists might bring progress (or snags) with Cmake to a wider > public? Valid point. I understand that may be the case indeed. OTOH, I think, the CMake has become a delicate topic in Boost. Every time I want to ask about any kind of use of CMake in Boost, I fear that will make the snowball rolling down the hill, again :) For instance, I wish Boost offered CMake support library, review eg. BCM and let it in. I'm not speaking of building Boost with CMake, no! I mean joint development of support scripts for Modern CMake which are useful for those Boost library developers who wish to add CMake configuration (along the official BB2), for convenience. I think such bunch of Boost for CMake scripts would foster better common practices. Currently, there is bunch of CMake-enabled libraries, each developed in isolation, each using different conventions, techniques, custom macros, modules. Lately, I was adding CMake setup for Boost.GIL. It made me wondering why the BCM thing is not in boost/tools/bcm. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

4 4

[GSOC18] GSOC18 with Boost.Intrusive
by Harsh Jain 24 Mar '18

24 Mar '18

Hi, I have shared a draft of my proposal for "Enhancing Boost.Intrusive library" through the GSOC portal. Someone please review that and reply with the feedbacks. Thanks, Harsh Jain

1 0