April 2016 - Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

Re: [boost] Boost CRC maintainer (Daryle Walker) missing in action?
by Olaf van der Spek 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

Hi Daryle, Any luck on your new setup? Gr, Olaf On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Daryle Walker <darylew(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I can look at it once I've finished my new setup. > > I had to reset my computer after a partial crash years ago. I never > got around to recreating my programming setup. My computer had been > at its maximum Operating System level back then, which is now 3 > versions behind. For the past few months, I've had my sister's old > laptop, with Windows Vista, and am trying to add a programming setup > to it now. > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Beman Dawes <bdawes(a)acm.org> wrote: >> Hi Daryle, >> >> This guy has volunteered to take over maintenance of Boost CRC. Should >> we take him up on his offer? > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: >> Date: Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:51 AM >> Subject: [boost] Boost CRC maintainer (Daryle Walker) missing in action? >> To: boost(a)lists.boost.org >> >> >> Hi, >> >> It looks like the Boost CRC maintainer (Daryle Walker) is missing in action? >> >> No response to tickets from the past 3 years. What's the procedure in this case? >> >> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2492 >> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/query?component=crc&col=id&col=summary&col… > > -- > Daryle Walker > Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie > darylew AT gmail DOT com -- Olaf

2 2

[msm] [statechart] unmerged PRs
by András Kucsma 23 May '17

23 May '17

Hi Everyone, There are a couple of PRs for msm and statechart by me and others, which didn't get any attention for many months now. Can the maintainers please take a look at them? https://github.com/boostorg/msm/pulls https://github.com/boostorg/statechart/pulls Thank you, Andras

2 2

[clang] clang-cl expansion of macros
by Edward Diener 29 Apr '17

29 Apr '17

You can get clang-cl ( clang-win ) to show its VC++ emulated expansion of macros somewhat by passing the c++ option '-fmacro-backtrace-limit=0' to the compiler. It is still blessedly difficult to see the what and the why of clang's error messages when expanding macro using clang-cl, but at least it gives you a better chance of understanding where clang's emulation of VC++ has gone wrong. I have posted bug 27380 to the llvm/clang bug tracker at https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27380 showing the main failure in VC++ emulation which I see when testing Boost PP with clang-cl.

3 8

[container] moving a pre-built vector into a flat_set
by Sam Kellett 12 Mar '17

12 Mar '17

a common problem i encounter is that i have two stage's w/r/t to a large collection of data: building and querying. vector is obviously the king of building. flat_set is the king of querying. so what i often tend to do is build up a very large vector, sort it then create a flat_set using the flat_set(ordered_unique_t) constructor. however this still copies the entire vector into the flat_set, right? what i would like to be able to do is move the vector straight into the flat_set, something like: std::vector<T> data; flat_set data_set1(std::move(data)) // move vector in and sort it // or: std::sort(data.begin(), data.end()); // sort vector flat_set data_set2(ordered_unique_t, std::move(data)) // and move it in is this doable (am i just being blind?) or is there plans/interest for this?

8 19

[nowide] Library Updates
by Artyom Beilis 04 Mar '17

04 Mar '17

Hello, Disclaimer: --------------- I recently discovered that virtually all e-mails sent from Yahoo account to any mailing lists go to user's spam due to recent Yahoo's DMARC policy. So I'm sending some important stuff from GMail account that almost certainly was missed: What is Boost.Nowide: -------------------------------- Boost.Nowide is a library that make cross platform Unicode aware programming easier. The library provides an implementation of standard C and C++ library functions, such that their inputs are UTF-8 aware on Windows without requiring to use Wide API. It was inspiration and inspired by http://utf8everywhere.org/ development ideas and policy. Some updates regarding Boost.Nowide ------------------------------- 1. Library moved to github and its format is converted to modular boost layout: https://github.com/artyom-beilis/nowide 2. Fixed unsupported std::ios::ate flag by boost::nowide::fstream 3. Added some C++11 interfaces to boost::nowide::fstream 4. Added integration functionality with boost::filesystem: https://github.com/artyom-beilis/nowide/blob/master/include/boost/nowide/in… Note: that the links to the source code on review schedule aren't relevant, it should be: - Code: https://github.com/artyom-beilis/nowide - Documentation: http://cppcms.com/files/nowide/html/ Also the library is still looking for review manager. Artyom Beilis P.S.: I'm sorry if you are getting this as "duplicate"

2 1

[MPL] A Proposal
by Bruno Dutra 16 Nov '16

16 Nov '16

Dear Community, About a year ago today, there was a proliferation of threads [1][2][3] in this mailing list concerning the future of Boost.MPL, or even whether it had a future at all, and opinions diverged widely on the matter. Many have expressed concerns about the fact Boost.MPL was long outdated and proposed major changes to open path for modernization, while some others argued against it, fearing unexpected and disastrous side-effects could propagate throughout the rest of Boost. A few questioned if it was worth it at all to spend any further resources on Boost.MPL given the fact new alternatives were coming up, such as Boost.Hana, which departed entirely from template metaprogramming, yet some argued TMP remained a competitive alternative for type computations in C++14 as it has been demonstrated by Peter Dimov in his impressive articles [4] on modern TMP. Amidst all this, a proposal by Robert Ramey [5] caught my attention and inspired me to develop what I call Metal [6], a template metaprogramming library designed on the same core principles as Boost.MPL, but written from the very beginning to take full advantage of C++11. Metal was not designed to be a strict drop in replacement for Boost.MPL though, it was rather meant to be regarded as a modern version of Boost.MPL's original API, diverging only where it could really benefit from modern C++ and that essentially means gains of several orders of magnitude in performance** and lower memory consumption. At this point Metal is very close to where I originally intended to bring it and I think it's time I gauge interest from the community on a modest proposal I've been maturing along the past year. As a modern approach to the same task that Boost.MPL was meant to address, I don't believe Boost would benefit at all from yet another TMP library that would essentially compete with Boost.MPL and even Boost.Hana in some cases, specially as maintainers of older code that depends on Boost.MPL would have to go through major refactoring efforts in order to benefit from such an addition to Boost. I would like to propose something different instead. My proposal is to make Metal officially into a new revision of Boost.MPL's API, essentially MPL2 as the original proposal by Robert Ramey put it, merging both into one single TMP library. The idea would be to provide a thin proxy for the current Boost.MPL API which would have two backends configurable by preprocessor switches: the original implementation and a another one based on Metal. This way older code using Boost.MPL could see immediate gains on performance by selecting the newer backend on supported compilers, while at the same time legacy code maintained on older compilers could still rely on Boost.MPL's impressive ability to run virtually anywhere. On the other hand, newer projects interested on pure type computations would have the newer API entirely available to them. This proposal also overcomes the problem of dealing with the maintainability of Boost.MPL, since it provides a way for smooth transition from legacy hacks required by ancient compilers into a cleaner and easier to maintain C++11 codebase, besides avoiding any breaking changes within existing code in the process. Furthermore, should this proposal make it into Boost, I would be naturally willing to take responsibility for the maintenance of Boost.MPL, which AFAIK has been maintained by the CMT for quite some time now, often with limited resources. Comparing Metal and Boost.MPL there are a few noteworthy differences. Metafunction Classes have proven themselves entirely unnecessary and have thus been removed altogether in favour of pure Lambdas (in the Boost.MPL sense). Moreover, iterators make little sense in a functional world, so these too have been removed despite the fact they may easily be emulated in the new design. Moreover Metal develops the concept of optionals, that is, its metafunctions only have a nested ::type defined when they may be successfully computed, what may be safely tested using metal::is_just and may also be used to SFINAE out of miscomputations. Finally I'd like to point out that Metal was designed to be portable across as many compilers as possible and three of the most popular ones are continuously tested using Travis and Appveyor: Clang 3.5+, GCC 4.8+ and MSVC 14 (2015). I hope this is a reasonable proposal and I look forward into your opinions about it. ** Even though I haven't published any benchmarks yet, an example follows just to back my claims regarding performance (just tested on my personal laptop running linux): //Generate a list containing 10 thousand instances of std::integral_constant, from 0 to 9999 using l = metal::enumerate_t<metal::integer<10000>>; // GCC 5.3 ~0.4 s // Clang 3.7 ~0.5 s //Transform a list containing 5 thousand numbers by squaring each element using l1 = metal::enumerate_t<metal::number<long long, 5000>>; using l2 = metal::transform_t<metal::pow<metal::_1, metal::integer<2>>, l1>; // GCC 5.3 ~5.6 s // Clang 3.7 ~3.0 s [1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/257680 [2]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/257983 [3]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/258843 [4]: http://pdimov.com/cpp2/simple_cxx11_metaprogramming.html [5]: http://rrsd.com/blincubator.com/bi_suggestion/mpl-lite-or-mpl2/ [6]: http://brunocodutra.github.io/metal/ Regards, Bruno Dutra

12 48

[config] RFC PR 82
by Domagoj Saric 01 Aug '16

01 Aug '16

Hi everyone, I am finally getting back to (trying to) contributing some of my personal projects to Boost. For two of those, Err (https://github.com/psiha/err) and especially Functonoid (a C++11 generalization and rewrite of my previous Boost.Function related work) I need some lower level codegen and/or optimiser control functionality (i.e. portable macros wrapping toolset specific attributes and pragmas) that I've added to my personal fork of Boost.Config and which I've now submitted in the subject PR (https://github.com/boostorg/config/pull/82) I don't expect this PR to be accepted as is/'just like that' so I'm opening this thread where we can discuss which of those changes/macros are welcome, which need more work and which, for some reason, should not be part of Boost.Config (and which, in turn then, I have to move to some 'internal implementation headers' in libraries that will need them). To avoid 'spamming' (and save time;) I'll skip the explanation of the individual macros as I expect them to mostly be self-explanatory (if not from their name then from the minimal Boost.Config documentation additions that are part of th PR). ps. I'll be on the (off) road for the next three weeks so I don't know when I'll be able to respond until I get back... -- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman

8 31

Boost.Fit review Mars 3-20 result
by Vicente J. Botet Escriba 24 May '16

24 May '16

Hi, I will be out for two weeks and I wanted to at least give the result of the Boost.Fit library review even if I would need more time to have a complete report. Summary ======= The review of the proposed Boost.Fit library ended on Mars 20, 2016. The verdict is: Conditional acceptance (a new review is needed) There were too much concerns about the documentation and what exactly this library is proposing and not enough reviews commenting the design, code and test for each one of the proposed functions. From the review discussion I deduce that there is some interest in the library, and that some people don't understand yet what the library is proposing. Paul has started already to take in account some if the issues raised during the review and a lot of them must be resolved before we re-try a new review. There were some discussion about the name of the library, but there were no consensus. Paul is free to change the name of his library and see how people react. On behalf of the Boost community, I would like to thank Paul Fultz for the work he has put into the Fit library so far. I encourage him to continue to evolve this library and to bring it back for a new review. We had seven 6 formal votes, and 2 more votes without a complete review abbreviated here: Steaven Watanabe: No in his current state Zach Laine : Conditinal acceptance Krzysztof Jusiak: Accepted Artyom Beilis : Rejected Peter Dimov : Accepted (no review) Manuel Sancher : Accepted (no review) Rob Stewart : Conditinal acceptance ??? Louis Dionne : Conditinal acceptance There were other people that participated on the review giving their advice respect to a specific issue. I thank each of these reviewers, and indeed everyone who invested some time participating in the discussions. If you feel that I have misrepresented your position, or have omitted or garbled an important point, please respond: the archived mail thread should accurately reflect the will of the community, even if this message does not. Detailed Report =============== You will need to wait yet for a month before I will be able to do it. On the mean time there are a lot of issues that must be addressed and that are part of the github issues. For more information see: Github:https://github.com/pfultz2/Fit/tree/boost Issues:https://github.com/pfultz2/Fit/issues Documentation:http://pfultz2.github.io/Fit/doc/html/ Hopping this helps, Vicente Botet Escriba

11 26

Boost 1.61.0 Release Candidate 1
by Vladimir Prus 09 May '16

09 May '16

The release candidates for the 1.61.0 release are now available at: http://boost.cowic.de/rc/boost_1_61_0_rc1.zip http://boost.cowic.de/rc/boost_1_61_0_rc1.7z http://boost.cowic.de/rc/boost_1_61_0_rc1.tar.bz2 http://boost.cowic.de/rc/boost_1_61_0_rc1.tar.gz The SHA256 checksums are as follows: dcd11a91a412b2e8a78678b38cb2a74857e61f9bfe2577de9fd70be770100d54 boost_1_61_0_rc1.7z 476937369c7a82103b734ccae85d35a523cdb7f8462c5f2fe1217ff0c8e2a7df boost_1_61_0_rc1.tar.bz2 e60dee39ebb29d24bf8a4ef9aec34dbb8c1b9b219d4737ea4b358f38b1aab2b7 boost_1_61_0_rc1.tar.gz e5f662f44a65c5c19450b8a1c07f75c7d5f16e58667871e856ba3984ec082006 boost_1_61_0_rc1.zip As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy. The signed list of checksums is also attached, signed with the following key: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xDA472E8659753BA4 Key fingerprint C5F0 F367 AA66 616F B839 806E DA47 2E86 5975 3BA4 Thanks! -- The release managers

14 38

Regression testing Clang/LLVM with VC14.
by degski 07 May '16

07 May '16

I have started a new thread as the other one "Testing of clang emualting the VC++ preprocessor on Windows" has become rather long and interlaced with less relevant musings. Here I would like to concentrate on the subject in the title. Sergey suggested I'd run regression tests, in the "other thread". I was hesitant at first, mostly due to the luke warm reception. Thanks to Google's simple coding of their spam filter, I actually missed the post by Niall Douglas of 4th of April. When it was referenced later and after I dug it from the archives, I became encouraged by the fact that maybe I wasn't all wrong and somebody within the community was actually thinking along similar lines as me. Following this I'd decided to take on regression testing. I chose to first simply test boost-develop against VC14, just to see how it goes. Some good, some bad. Was easy to set up (git already included with VC14, all what I needed to do was install python, which I normally have, but I'm having a new laptop). The bad, space required 44GB (advertised as 5GB). Possibly .pdb files (debugger symbols) are filling up disk-space uselessly. Next bad, the process finished with the following lines: # Done writing "C:\boost_develop\results\degski.xml". # Compressing "C:\boost_develop\results\degski.xml"... # Done writing "C:\boost_develop\results\degski.zip". # Uploading log archive "C:\boost_develop\results\degski.zip" to develop # <lambda> failed with message "[Errno 10013] An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions" # Retrying (5 more attempts). # Uploading log archive "C:\boost_develop\results\degski.zip" to develop # <lambda> failed with message "[Errno 10013] An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions" # Retrying (4 more attempts). # Uploading log archive "C:\boost_develop\results\degski.zip" to develop # <lambda> failed with message "[Errno 10013] An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions" # Retrying (3 more attempts). # Uploading log archive "C:\boost_develop\results\degski.zip" to develop # <lambda> failed with message "[Errno 10013] An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions" # Retrying (2 more attempts). # Uploading log archive "C:\boost_develop\results\degski.zip" to develop # <lambda> failed with message "[Errno 10013] An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions" # Retrying (1 more attempts). # Uploading log archive "C:\boost_develop\results\degski.zip" to develop # <lambda> failed with message "[Errno 10013] An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions" # Giving up. Traceback (most recent call last): File "run.py", line 71, in <module> runner(root) File "C:\boost_develop\boost_regression_src\regression.py", line 287, in __init__ self.main() File "C:\boost_develop\boost_regression_src\regression.py", line 624, in main getattr(self,action_m)() File "C:\boost_develop\boost_regression_src\regression.py", line 591, in command_regression self.command_upload_logs() File "C:\boost_develop\boost_regression_src\regression.py", line 538, in command_upload_logs lambda: File "C:\boost_develop\boost_regression_src\regression.py", line 663, in retry return f() File "C:\boost_develop\boost_regression_src\regression.py", line 546, in <lambda> self.dart_server ) File "C:\boost_develop\boost_regression_src\collect_and_upload_logs.py", line 430, in upload_logs upload_to_ftp( tag, logs_archive, ftp_proxy, debug_level, ftp_url ) File "C:\boost_develop\boost_regression_src\collect_and_upload_logs.py", line 256, in upload_to_ftp ftp = ftplib.FTP( ftp_site ) File "C:\Python27\lib\ftplib.py", line 120, in __init__ self.connect(host) File "C:\Python27\lib\ftplib.py", line 135, in connect self.sock = socket.create_connection((self.host, self.port), self.timeout) File "C:\Python27\lib\socket.py", line 575, in create_connection raise err socket.error: [Errno 10013] An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions I've re-checked this page <http://www.boost.org/development/running_regression_tests.html>again, there's no mention of "registering" or something similar. Some tests must have failed, got prompted for starting the debugger twice (is the latter normal). This was a test-run (testing the testing), with VC14U2. Assuming the above can get sorted, I would in reality like to test Clang/LLVM (with VC14U2). I would like to ask (Niall Douglas in particular, I guess) what the suggested parameters to run.py should be for this combo. Should I target clang.exe or clang-cl.exe, develop or master. What about Clang/C2? How to reduce disk-space usage? degski

5 7