January 2014 - Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

[Macro]Test Case grouping using Traits
by Hemanth Choudary M V (RBEI/ETA1) 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

Hello, I have observed that in native unit test framework(c++), there is an option to group test cases using attributes which are reflected as traits in the Test Explorer window in MS VS2012. Following is a an example of the same: BEGIN_TEST_METHOD_ATTRIBUTE(TestMethod3) TEST_OWNER(L"SuperMan") TEST_PRIORITY(2) TEST_METHOD_ATTRIBUTE(L"Category",L"Slow") END_TEST_METHOD_ATTRIBUTE() TEST_METHOD(TestMethod3) { Assert::AreEqual(2,6); } How can this be achieved via Boost Unit Test Library? Are there macros to achieve the same? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards, Hemanth Choudary MV RBEI/ETA1

2 1

[Test] Problems with debug::break_memory_alloc
by Fredrik Orderud 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

I have a problem with the memory-leak detection logic in boost.test. What happens when unit_test::framework::init starts up on Windows is that memory-leak detection is first explicitly activated. Secondly, debug::break_memory_alloc is called with a value (default is 1). Activation of leak detection is great, but to always override the allocation number to break on is not necessary a good idea if the user has already set a value from a debugger. In my case I am investigating a leak from a static member allocated prior to main and/or boost.test being invoked. In that case, I need to break the program early to be able to set the allocation number to break on. This works well by itself, but it's _very_ confusing when boost.test afterwards replaces my allocation number with a default value. Could it be possible to modify boost.test, so that it only modifies the allocation number to break on if the user has explicitly requested to break on a given allocation? Thanks in advance, Fredrik Orderud

2 4

[test] broken (fails to compile) with boost.timer since 1.48
by Jamie Allsop 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

Boost.Test fails to compile since 1.48 when Boost.Timer is included. I find that often I want to use timers when testing. I reported this back in 2012 along with a comprehensive patch that fixes the issue. On the eve of 1.55 I see the patch has still not been applied, despite an original agreement to do so. Unfortunately I don't have commit privileges so I am unable to do this myself. The original discussion from here: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2012/09/196811.php went as follows: > On 25/09/12 18:14, Gennadiy Rozental wrote: >> Jamie Allsop<ja11sop<at> yahoo.co.uk> writes: >> >>> >>> These are patches we've been using for some time locally, the recent >>> discussions highlighted the importance of pushing patches like these to >>> a wider audience. >>> >>> In summary the key changes are: >>> >>> * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7410 >>> * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7397 >> >> These are fine. I'll try to check it in on a weekend > > Excellent thanks! Yet https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7397 was never applied. With changes to Boost.Test since then it is likely that the patch needs modified to be applied but that should not be too hard. Apart from that I'd like to see the suite of 4 patches applied as a whole. So far only https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7410 has been applied but the patches address severe use-case short-comings in Boost.Test that make it viable for broader testing use. I've summaried them below. * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7397 * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7410 (applied) * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7417 (small) * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7419 (small) Original discussion that didn't really get very far was in these threads: * http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2012/09/196811.php * http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2012/09/196828.php For those who are interested I've pasted my original motivations from the year old thread below as a reminder. Basically the patches allow Boost.Test to: * compile with Boost.Timer (so not broken) * output test progress on the fly in a format other tools could parse * allows Boost.Test to be used for live test diagnostics in running systems in a 'test' mode Jamie * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7410 (applied) * all test cases/suites have file and line information captured so that external tools can use the Boost.Log output to create links into the source tree, answering questions like, "What is this test case?". It is possible to simply follow the link and see. * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7417 * update the Boost.Test log output to include summary status information when a test case or suite is completed. This includes the test status, assertions passed and total assertions. This allows live test status to be viewed and nicer tools to be built around this. For example each test can be shown starting, in progress and then complete with the resulting status in detail. I should note that Boost.Test reports currently output this additional test status but this is done only on *completion of all tests* and so *cannot* be used to show live progress. * this additional test status as part of the log can be easily captured using regular expressions if HRF is used and many IDEs will allow colourisation, autolinking and so on using similar approaches. * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7397 * update Boost.Test to use the new Boost.Timer classes introduced in Boost 1.48. This can be suppressed through the use of a macro should the old timers be preferred. The new Boost.Timer provides much better timing information than the old Boost.Timer library. You should refer to the library itself for an explanation of why the previous timer library was deprecated: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_51_0/libs/timer/doc/index.html * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7419 Essentially the patch does two things: * It allows boost::unit_test_framework::init() to be called more than once. The result is to reset the test status and master test suite so that new tests can be added and new reports generated through multiple calls. The CLA parsing is also reset. Recent changes to this code may make my call to clear() redundant. I'll let Gennadiy be the judge of that. * This first change then allows the framework setup and teardown to be encapsulated in a helper class (not provided in the patch but one could be). In our systems we use a helper class that exposes a simple API that allows the user to implement a method where test units can be added directly to the master test suite - see the ticket for an example. As I said the patch focuses solely on enabling the possibility of writing such a class, not the class itself. * It provides scoped Boost.Test arguments for the commandline when BOOST_TEST_USE_QUALIFIED_COMMANDLINE_ARGUMENTS is defined. All command line arguments are then called --boost.test.<argument> for example --boost.test.log_level instead of --log_level. This of course means that all Boost.Test related arguments will not clash with any program arguments. On its own this is a generally useful feature as it allows custom main() functions to pass arguments down to other components during simple unit testing.

2 1

Boost unit test with BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS
by driscoll 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

I work on a team that uses compiles with exception support disabled. (That... is not my decision, and no value judgments on that, please. :-)) I'd kind of like to use the unit test library. However, at a surface level it has lots of uses of raw try/catch/throw instead of BOOST_TRY/BOOST_CATCH/BOOST_THROW. At a deeper level, I suspect what's doing is throwing an exception on an EXPECT or ASSERT failure -- and thus that disabling exceptions will basically mean that a test failure will cause an immediate abort in the program. (I guess I can hack around that in an ugly but somewhat-reasonable way.) How hopeless is using the library with BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS? Evan

3 2

(no subject)
by Gly Marvellou 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

Hi, I'm a CS major and new to this list. I want to contribute to Boost C++ libraries under GSOC 14. Can someone guide me through? Gly

1 0

Data-Structures, Ideas. GSoC 2014
by Ankit Vadehra 12 Jan '14

12 Jan '14

Hi, I'm Ankit Vadehra, and i was contacting to ask whether Boost is considering participation in GSoC 2014, and if it is, then are there some new ideas of some priority Data Structures Classes that are to be introduced in Boost ?? For Example, previously have worked on Trie Data Structure as well as Boom Filters and so on, but none of these advanced data-structures were merged in the main library, anyways.. Anyways, are there any new ideas?? GSoC, ain't that far away now, and Idea Page is till not up.. ?? Is someone working on it, by any chance ? Thanks.! -- Ankit.Vadehra "The Code Is free, But its Priceless" "Exactly, which way is Forward ?"

1 0

[trac] where is david_abrahams?
by Eric Niebler 11 Jan '14

11 Jan '14

Dave is still listed as the primary maintainer of several libraries, but Trac won't let me assign a new bug to him. "david_abrahams" isn't one of the choices in the Owner drop down. Where'd he go? -- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org

2 2

[multi_index][ann] Boost.MultiIndex 1.56 preview: major update with new hashed index implementation
by Joaquín Mª López Muñoz 11 Jan '14

11 Jan '14

Hi, Those interested can already download the preview of Boost.MultiIndex as it'll be shipped in Boost 1.56: https://github.com/boostorg/multi_index/archive/master.zip Full release notes can be read at https://rawgithub.com/boostorg/multi_index/master/doc/release_notes.html#bo… The most important change is a complete reimplementation of the internals of hashed indices, so that erasure of elements is constant-time regardless of the level of occupancy of the internal bucket array (previously, performance degraded as the bucket was being depleted.) A full description of the new data structure as compared with other popular implementations of unordered associative containers is given at: http://bannalia.blogspot.com/2013/10/implementation-of-c-unordered.html http://bannalia.blogspot.com/2013/10/implementation-of-c-unordered_25.html Along with some performance results: http://bannalia.blogspot.com/2013/11/measuring-insertion-times-for-c.html http://bannalia.blogspot.com/2013/11/measuring-insertion-times-for-c_16.html http://bannalia.blogspot.com/2013/11/measuring-erasure-times-for-c-unordere… http://bannalia.blogspot.com/2013/11/measuring-lookup-times-for-c-unordered… The new data structure has been thoroughly tested but some pre-shipping feedback is always welcome, so if you test this please report back. Thank you, Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica Digital ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

3 5

Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite
by Brian Wood 10 Jan '14

10 Jan '14

Gennadiy Rozental: > I am all for working with Richard on new docs. I am just not sure this > particular version worth time people will need to spent to get used to it. > What Boost.Test really need is to document new release. And this is what we > should be targeting. New features and new docs look and feel will make it > all worth while. I'm not using this library, but I agree with Gennadiy. -- Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. http://webEbenezer.net

1 0

Fumbling with modular Boost and GIT
by Paul A. Bristow 10 Jan '14

10 Jan '14

I have recently been fumbling with Modular Boost to do some routine maintenance and update of documentation on Boost.Math, with generally most unhappy results. Although this is partly from my general modest familiarity with GIT, I feel that the documentation of the process of doing things is woefully thin. There are far too many vital details assumed or unsaid. I'm posting this in the hope that someone will produce a fully documented and illustrated blow-by-blow (preferably using Tortoise GIT and including its displays) description of how to work cooperatively on the develop branch, and a specific library development sub-branch. This should cover (at least) getting changes to headers in /boost and /libs made by others, making a change to a header file, making a change to tests, testing it using an IDE, and making a change to an example (containing some embedded Quickbook) in and IDE and running it, and to changing Quickbook files in the /library/doc folder, and finally pushing. And now, for a change, I'm off for a little quiet alligator wrestling ;-) Paul --- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow(a)hetp.u-net.com

2 2