September 2013 - Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

mpl broken after removal of nttp.hpp in 85956
by Jürgen Hunold 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

Hi Stephen, the message is: home/hunold/src/devel/boost/boost/mpl/aux_/nttp_decl.hpp:17:42: fatal error: boost/mpl/aux_/config/nttp.hpp: No such file or directory It seems that even nttp_decl.hpp is obsolete, as is only contains: // Obsolete. Remove. # define BOOST_MPL_AUX_NTTP_DECL(T, x) T x /**/ Maybe incomplete quick patch attached. Yours, Jürgen -- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! * voice: ++49 4257 300 ! Fährstraße 1 * fax : ++49 4257 300 ! 31609 Balge/Sebbenhausen * jhunold(a)gmx.eu ! Germany

2 1

[type_traits][function_types] Discard param const qualification, bug or feature?
by Mostafa 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

Both the type_traits and function_types library discard parameter const-qualifiers when decomposing function types. Is this a bug or a feature? If a feature, then it's surprising enough behaviour that I think it warrants some documentation in both libraries. For the record, I'm using gcc 4.7.3 on Cygwin 1.7.22 in Windows 7, and here's a reproducible example of what I'm talking about: #include <boost/type_traits.hpp> #include <boost/function_types/parameter_types.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/at.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/int.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/assert.hpp> using namespace boost; typedef void (foo)(int const); int main() { typedef function_traits<foo>::arg1_type traits_deduced_type; BOOST_MPL_ASSERT(( is_same<traits_deduced_type, int> )); //Errors: //BOOST_MPL_ASSERT(( is_same<traits_deduced_type, int const> )); typedef boost::function_types::parameter_types<foo> ftypes_params; typedef boost::mpl::at<ftypes_params, boost::mpl::int_<0> >::type ftypes_deduced_type; BOOST_MPL_ASSERT(( is_same<ftypes_deduced_type, int> )); //Errors: //BOOST_MPL_ASSERT(( is_same<ftypes_deduced_type, int const> )); return 0; } Mostafa

5 10

Student and Internationaltickets for Meeting C++
by Jens Weller 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

Hello boost-community, a short update on the upcoming Meeting C++ Conference. There are 3 different discounts available - Student discount of 200 € - international guests 100 € - boost contributor* 100 / 50 € The discount works over a code, so you need to contact me, in order to be given your discount-code. The discount for boost contributors is 100 €, or additional 50 € if combined with one of the other discounts. More information on the Discounts: http://meetingcpp.com/index.php/newsreader/items/announcing-student-and-int… Meeting C++ 2013 Schedule: http://meetingcpp.com/index.php/schedule13.html General Information on the conf: http://meetingcpp.com/index.php/mcpp2013.html * you should have activly contributed to boost kind regards, Jens Weller

1 0

Re: [boost] Some patches to remove obsolete MSVC version checks
by Stephen Kelly 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

On 09/13/2013 01:35 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Hi, > > I've attached patches to remove or simplify some ifdefs for MSVC > versions which are now obsolete. > > This is a followup to this thread: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/243094 > (Removing old config macro and increasing compiler requirements., > 2013-07-29) > > The patches are most easily applied locally and reviewed with a git-svn > checkout and git am. > > I'll also apply to get SVN access so I can commit patches myself. FYI, I've started cherry-picking, re-reviewing and committing these patches. I'll keep the patches small and single-issue. I would appreciate post-commit review from anyone for any of them, as some of the ifdef chains are complex. Thanks, Steve.

2 2

BoostPro closing the doors and needing volunteers
by munsingh 25 Sep '13

25 Sep '13

Hello Boost Maintainers, I observed that BoostPro have closed doors and have made the project open source. I would like to volunteer for maintaining and enhancing the pre-build binaries and sources for boost pre-built installers. Kindly let me know what all is desired from a person who wishes to take up this activity. Thanks & Regards, Manish -- May the force be with you

2 1

VC12 RC: Compiler crash when mixing boost::synchronized_value, Boost.ptree and uniform initialization.
by Klaim - Joël Lamotte 25 Sep '13

25 Sep '13

Just for information, if that can help, I just reported this bug that I can only reproduce using boost::synchronized_value<boost::property_tree::ptree>::operator->() It's obviously a compiler problem but it might help adapting Boost code it if it is not fixed in time for VS2013 release: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/802157/compiler… As said in the comments, I didn't find how to reproduce it in a simpler way.

1 0

Re: [boost] [thread] synchronized_value: value and move semantics
by Andrey Semashev 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba < vicente.botet(a)wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > boost::synchronized_value (not released yet [1][2][3]) is based on [4]. > See below part of this paper adapted to the Boost.Thread interface. > > Currently boost::synchronized_value is in addition Copyable and Swappable. > I was wondering if it is worth adding value and move semantics to > synchronized_value. Making it EqualityComparable, LessThanComparable and > Movable if the underlying type satisfy these requirements will allow to > store them on a Boost.Container/C++11 container. > > Do you see something completely wrong with this addition? > Has some of you had a need for this? Could you share the context? > Sorry, I missed this discussion somehow. I've taken a quick look at the interface and have a few questions: 1. Why are there strict_lock_ptr and unique_lock_ptr? What are the differences and why we can't have one such ptr (presumably, unique_lock_ptr)? 2. I find value() and get() a bit confusing, since it is not apparent what is the difference between them. Maybe value() could be renamed to get_ref() or unsafe_get()? 3. Am I correct that having strict_lock_ptr/unique_lock_ptr acquired by calling synchronize() will not deadlock with operator-> when a non-recursive mutex is used?

5 11

Re: [boost] [Boost-users] cross-compilation x86_64-w64-ming32: undefined reference to `InterlockedIncrement'
by Frédéric Bron 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

So I eventually managed to fix the issue with interlocked.hpp and mingw-w64: both i686 and x86_64 now work. Attached is a patch against 1.54.0. Is it possible to include this in 1.55.0? Regards, Frédéric

3 17

Is there any interest in a library for application : Boost.Application, new version: Boost.Application_beta_3a_release_2
by Renato Forti 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

Hi all, The docs and lib are updated! Please, send your comments. http://www.dokfile.com/appbeta3/docs/libs/application/doc/html/index.html PS: I want to take and ask for help, if any native english speaker can help me with the documentation! Please, contact: re.tf <at> acm.org Thanks

5 8

Referencing Boost.Iostreams in the documentation of a non-boost library
by Gene Panov 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

Boost Experts, I am a fan of Boost.Iostreams and I am referencing them several times in the documentation of a little library that I wrote and posted on Google Code under "New BSD license" (https://code.google.com/p/async-ostream/). Do I need to provide a full URL or copyright information or anything else to make such reference to Boost.Iostreams legally sound? Or shall I just switch to use Boost Software License instead to keep it simple? Thanks! Gene

3 2