July 2013 - Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

Re: [boost] [asio] Randomly having problems reading from the socket
by Marat Abrarov 30 Jul '13

30 Jul '13

> Posted a Bug Report here: Ticket #8937 > <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8937> Seems like a bug/feature of Windows 7/Vista (or a bug/feature of Windows socket subsystem) - something in background/foreground process scheduling or a memory management issue. Nevertheless it is interesting to know the Asio author's point of view. It will be more clear if the topic starter rewrites his (simple) examples to use WinSock directly rather than through the Asio (use the same time measurement - by means of boost::posix_time). I think that such rewritten examples will show the same behavior. Regards, Marat Abrarov.

1 0

[preprocessor] ARRAY_REPLACE bug?
by Mostafa 30 Jul '13

30 Jul '13

On Windows 7/Cygwin, using boost 1.53, preprocessing the following snippet: pp_array.cc ----------- #include <boost/preprocessor.hpp> //#define BOOST_PP_TUPLE_REM_0() // nothing #define ARRAY (3, (a, x, c)) BOOST_PP_ARRAY_REPLACE(ARRAY, 1, b) via: g++ -E -P -I /... pp_array.cc gives the following incorrect result: (3, (BOOST_PP_TUPLE_REM_0 () a, b , c)) Uncommenting the pound define in the snippet gives the correct result for the preprocessor. Is this a bug?

3 5

[type_erasure] move
by Christophe Henry 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

Hi Steven, I'm looking for a crash I get in my own code with g++4.8.1 (4.5 - 4.7 are ok). Maybe you can help me: - there is a copy_constructible concept, but no moveable. Is it enough to add one on the same model? It looks like you std::forward so I'd say yes. Correct? template<class T = _self> struct move_constructible : ::boost::mpl::vector<constructible<T(T&&)>, destructible<T> > {}; - If I std::move a copy_constructible any type by accident, what do I get? A copy? A crash? Thanks, Christophe

2 2

Re: [boost] [asio] Randomly having problems reading from the socket
by FlorianGeorge 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

Posted a Bug Report here: Ticket #8937 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8937> -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/asio-Randomly-having-problems-reading-fr… Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

New failing tests in circular buffer on some platforms
by Paul A. Bristow 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

I note that there are some new failing tests for circular buffer on some platforms http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/circular_buffer.html on MSVC noncopyable_movable_noexcept_t is causing trouble base_test.cpp C:\boost_regression\trunk\boost\boost/circular_buffer/base.hpp(694) : error C2558: struct 'noncopyable_movable_noexcept_t' : no copy constructor available or copy constructor is declared 'explicit' C:\boost_regression\trunk\boost\boost/circular_buffer/base.hpp(673) : while compiling class template member function 'noncopyable_movable_noexcept_t *boost::circular_buffer<T>::linearize(void)' with [ T=noncopyable_movable_test_t ] c:\boost_regression\trunk\boost\libs\circular_buffer\test\common.ipp(2160) : see reference to function template instantiation 'noncopyable_movable_noexcept_t *boost::circular_buffer<T>::linearize(void)' being compiled with [ T=noncopyable_movable_test_t ] c:\boost_regression\trunk\boost\libs\circular_buffer\test\common.ipp(2236) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::circular_buffer<T>' being compiled with [ T=noncopyable_movable_test_t ] C:\boost_regression\trunk\boost\boost/circular_buffer/base.hpp(697) : error C2558: struct 'noncopyable_movable_noexcept_t' : no copy constructor available or copy constructor is declared 'explicit' ON gcc and Clang there are warnings and failure Running 60 test cases... ../libs/circular_buffer/test/common.ipp(2303): error: in "check_containers_exception_specifications": check boost::has_nothrow_constructor<circular_buffer<int> >::value has failed Can any experts shed light on this? I do not believe that the underlying circular buffer code has changed recently. Paul --- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow(a)hetp.u-net.com

2 2

[thread] Questions about broken_promise
by Klaim - Joël Lamotte 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

I have a few questions concerning broken promises (exception): 1. is the broken_promise exception a standard, or future standard behaviour? So far I assumed it wasn't because http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/promise/~promise don't say anything about this and I only read about broken_promise exceptions on Boost.Thread documentation. I would like to know if I should expect the future standard library to have the same concept. I see no configuration macro to deactivate these exceptions. I don't want to actually, but if I'm correct that it's not standard or future standard, then it's surprising that I can't setup a standard-like setup. 2. I have a case that could be summarized like this: ///////////////////////////////////////////// Updated by thread A: struct X { /*... */ }; struct K { future<shared_ptr<X,U>> m_ft_x; shared_ptr<X,U> m_x; K( Foo& foo ) : m_ft_x( foo.create<X>() ) {} void update() // this is always called by a loop in the thread A { if( !m_x ) { if( m_ft_x.has_value() ) m_x = m_ft_x.get(); } else work(); } void work(); // uses m_x }; Updated by thread B: // special deleter which will just push a task in Foo work queue for deleting the object // in sync with thread B struct U { /* ... */ }; struct Foo { template< class T > future<shared_ptr<T,U>> create() // will push a creation task in a work queue updated in update() void update(); // called by a loop in the thread B, will execute all the work pushed in the work queue. }; ///////////////////////////////////////////// (this is an exageratedly simplified version of what I'm doing) It works nicely (even if I think it could be improved with future.then and other tools) but there is a minor problem appearing when an instance of K is constructed then almost immediately destructed, before the instance of Foo executed the creation of the X instance. In this case, visual studio (which is configured to detect all throw calls) detect a broken_promise exception thrown from the destructor of the promise which was in the code generated by Foo::create() and pushed in a work queue. I look at the destructor and I see: if(!future_->done && !future_->is_constructed) { future_->mark_exceptional_finish_internal(boost::copy_exception(broken_promise()), lock); } Here is the full copy_exception code: template <class T> inline exception_ptr copy_exception( T const & e ) { try { throw enable_current_exception(e); } catch( ... ) { return current_exception(); } } This code triggers actually two "first-chance" exceptions this is the first one) which are catch immediately intentionally. My question is: why is copy_exception necessary and why does it have to do it this way? It's a very minor problem as just re-setting my visual studio debugging settings to default makes the exception transparent -only visible in the console log. However each time I activate debug breaking on all c++ exception so that I can debug some potential issues, I can have a breakpoint which is actually "noise" as it is only used to implement a copy of exception. Is it possible to eliminate this noise? Or, as I'm guessing, is there a language or compiler limitation which forces this code to be written this way? Thanks for your time. Joel Lamotte

2 2

safe bool not safe enough ?
by John Maddock 28 Jul '13

28 Jul '13

Just discovered (oops!) that the so called safe bool ideom is not as safe as it appears, for example: class Testable { bool ok_; typedef void (Testable::*bool_type)() const; void this_type_does_not_support_comparisons() const {} public: explicit Testable(bool b=true):ok_(b) {} operator bool_type() const { return ok_==true ? &Testable::this_type_does_not_support_comparisons : 0; } }; Testable t(true); bool b = t; // Compiles OK - Ooops! Which is causing multiprecision to misbehave when used in conjunction with uBlas: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8292#comment:2 I guess making the conversion explicit in C++11 mode would help (I still need to test that), but is there a C++03 solution? Thanks, John.

4 9

radix sort
by Sourav 28 Jul '13

28 Jul '13

Hi All, I wanted to know if someone is/was working on Radix Sort or not. I did check the SoC listings and did not see radix sort in the list. If no one is working, may someone help me provide some pointers/details as to what the expectation is with regards to Radix sort for boost ? Regards, -Sourav

7 27

boost::python help?
by David M. Cotter 26 Jul '13

26 Jul '13

i'd like my app to be "available" to python while it's running. for example, say my app is "FooBar.app". when my FooBar.app is running, now there is a python interface available to python, and the user can write python scripts to make use of it with their scripts, they can control my running application when FooBar.app is NOT running, perhaps making use of any of the python functions of "FooBar.app" would either return an error, or possibly launch "FooBar.app". can boost::python help with this? i've never worked with extending or embedding python, so any help would be super great

4 5

Patch bonanza for VS2013 Preview support
by Lars Viklund 25 Jul '13

25 Jul '13

Hi list. What's the best way to spend your vacation if not trying to get Boost to build on bleeding-edge compilers. I set out to see how well Boost 1.54.0 behaved on the newly released go-live-ready Visual Studio 2013 Preview. Below is the list of bugs filed against Boost and Microsoft. Enjoy. With these patches in place, I can get a complete build working with all libraries normally available on a fresh machine (means that I didn't test Python, MPI, ICU, compressed streams). I haven't been able to find out how to run the tests in any human-readable form, but this should not cause any regressions as it's either increasing workaround bounds or adding headers that the standard mandates already. Boost.Config VS2013 Preview version bump https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8753 The Visual Studio 2013 Preview toolchain has _MSC_VER 1800 and _MSC_FULL_VER 180020617. See the attached patch for the minimum changes that are needed to get anywhere at all. Boost.Build needs support for the VS2013 Preview toolset (18.00.20617.1) https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8754 Visual Studio 2013 Preview is out and claims to be 12.0. I copy-pasted everything related to 11.0 to refer to 12.0 and it Works On My Machine, see attached patch. Boost.Signals VS2013 Preview version bump https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8755 The BOOST_WORKAROUND macros at boost/signals/detail/named_slot_map.hpp:130 and libs/signals/src/named_slot_map.cpp:27 needs to be increased to <= 1800 in order to encompass the Visual Studio 2013 Preview compiler. Boost.MPL VS2013 Preview version bump https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8756 The BOOST_WORKAROUND macros at boost/mpl/assert.hpp lines 37 and 247 need to be changed to also consider BOOST_MSVC, == 1800, patch attached. Boost.Serialization lacks algorithm header include for std::min https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8757 The <algorithm> header providing std::min is not included in boost/archive/iterators/transform_width.hpp, this breaks on Visual Studio 2013 Preview due to library changes. Boost.Asio lacks algorithm header include for std::min https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8758 The <algorithm> header providing std::min is not included in boost/asio/detail/impl/win_iocp_io_service.hpp, this breaks on Visual Studio 2013 Preview due to library changes. std::bind broken with boost/tuple/tuple.hpp or anything else providing a ADL tie https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/792163/std-bind… Not our fault, I filed a bug on Connect and am hoping that they'll notice it before RTM. 'std::bind' finds our 'tie' if a type from a boost namespace is used in the 'std::function' argument type list. -- Lars Viklund | zao(a)acc.umu.se

13 35