March 2012 - Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

Boost Fusion suggestion
by Pavel Bažant 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

I am not actually a Boost developer, but have the following suggestion regarding boost.fusion: I find the macro BOOST_FUSION_DEFINE_STRUCT potentially very useful, but it does not provide means to influence the initialization list of the default constructor. Alternatively, means to emulate c++11 default initialization (the struct Foo {int x=10;} syntax) could be emulated. Such feature would be very useful, as it would minimize repetition and make it easier to ensure that uninitialized variables are nowhere used. I already generate my structs from BOOST_PP sequences in a similar way to BOOST_FUSION_DEFINE_STRUCT to avoid having to write json serialization boilerplate, but a variant of BOOST_FUSION_DEFINE_STRUCT i am suggesting would make this task even simpler. Pavel Bazant

2 1

[functional] [overloaded_function] polymorphic functions?
by Lorenzo Caminiti 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

Hello all, I spent some time trying to make overloaded_function support polymorphic functions but I had little success :( 1) I was able to do this (see code below): overloaded_function< void (int) , functor<poly, void (generic)> > o(f, p); o(321); o(3.21); o("cba"); But I don't like it because I explicitly have to pass the functor type poly. I wanted instead to only use generic to tag the template parameters in the signature: overloaded_function< void (int) , void (generic) > o(f, p); o(321); o(3.21); o("cba"); I'd consider this acceptable but I wasn't able to program this because I loose p's type (poly) in base so base cannot hold a reference to the functor p... Is there a way around this? (Some type-erasure magic maybe??) 2) I don't think this can work with function templates because in order to get a pointer to a function template you have to instantiate it: g<char*> Now I can get the function pointer but it's not polymorphic anymore... 3) I don't think there is any way to implement make_overloaded_function with polymorphic types because I can't re-construct the function signature from the functor given that its operator contains template parameters... I have no idea on how to work around this... If you have suggestions for 1, 2, or 3), they are welcome. Otherwise, it seems that supporting polymorphic functions in overloaded_function is not really feasible... The little I got so far: #include <boost/function.hpp> #include <boost/type_traits/function_traits.hpp> #include <iostream> void f(int x) { std::cout << x << std::endl; } template<typename T> void g(T x) { std::cout << x << std::endl; } struct poly { template<typename T> void operator()(T x) { std::cout << x << std::endl; } }; template<typename F> struct base { template<typename G> base(G g) : f_(g) {} typename boost::function_traits<F>::result_type operator()( typename boost::function_traits<F>::arg1_type arg1 ) { return f_(arg1); } private: boost::function<F> f_; }; struct generic; template<typename Ftor, typename F> struct functor; template<typename Ftor, typename R> struct base< functor<Ftor, R (generic)> > { base(Ftor& ftor) : ftor_(ftor) {} template<typename Arg1> R operator()(Arg1 arg1) { return ftor_(arg1); } private: Ftor& ftor_; }; template<typename F1, typename F2> struct overloaded_function : base<F1>, base<F2> { template<typename G1, typename G2> overloaded_function(G1 g1, G2 g2) : base<F1>(g1), base<F2>(g2) {} using base<F1>::operator(); using base<F2>::operator(); }; int main() { f(123); g("xyz"); boost::function<void (char*)> gg = g<char*>; poly p; p(1.23); p("abc"); overloaded_function< void (int) , functor<poly, void (generic)> > o(f, p); o(321); o(3.21); o("cba"); return 0; } Thanks a lot. --Lorenzo

4 5

[git] What's the IDE picture like?
by Rene Rivera 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

All this talk about switching to git brings up one important question for me, and I suspect others.. Given all the various git-flow, git-this, git-that, git-whatever, tools that are getting mentioned.. What is the process for a user that wants to do their development, including version control, like? Specifically what does an: * Eclipse user do? * Xcode user do? * VIsualStudio user do? I ask because I'm really tired of learning yet more command lines tools at this stage in my life. And even though all GUI tools have drawbacks they do have the advantage that they condense the workflow usages to something understandable. And I would be really hard pressed to use any new version control system that I can't use a GUI. And preferably an integrated GUI. -- -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo

9 12

[move] explicit moving from a rvalue
by Vicente J. Botet Escriba 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

Hi Ion, With the current emulation of move semantics of Boost.Thread using Boost.move, I have a case that I would like to make working in a portable way boost::thread t = boost::thread( MoveOnly()); The library declares the template move constructor from a movable callable as as follows template <class F> explicit thread(boost::rv<F>& f); and MoveOnly is declared as defined below. The problem is a know limitation as the compiler is unable to deduce F as been MoveOnly even if MoveOnly is convertible to boost::rv<MoveOnly>& Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. made a proposal to try to solve the issue, but his proposal has a performance penality. Here it is a less elegant but efficient enough alternative. The addition of a explicit move conversion as ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>& move() { return *static_cast< ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>* >(this); } allows to the following to work as expected boost::thread t = boost::thread( MoveOnly().move()); While this workaround works when we are using the emulation it doesn't works when rvalue references are supported. I have defined a macro BOOST_EXPLICIT_MOVE that allows to write portable code #if ! defined BOOST_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES #define BOOST_MOVE(RVALUE) RVALUE #else #define BOOST_MOVE(RVALUE) RVALUE.move() #endif that can be used as boost::thread t = boost::thread( BOOST_MOVE(MoveOnly())); The move() function is not really needed as the macro can hide the needed conversion, but could be preferred by users that don't need to make portable programs. The evident liability is of course the use of the macro. Is there something wrong on this design, something to to improve? The same design can be used on compilers, such as as SunStudio (see https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6222) that prefer the overload of a private copy constructor to an public move constructor. On these kind of compilers the following overload private: MoveOnly(MoveOnly&); public MoveOnly(boost::rv<MoveOnly>&) makes the following to fail at compile time MoveOnly MakeMoveOnly() { return MoveOnly(); } but MoveOnly( MakeMoveOnly(() { return BOOST_MOVE(MoveOnly()); } will work. Do you think that member functions as the explicit move() and a macro as BOOST_MOVE can be added to Boost.Move emulation? Best, Vicente ///////////////////////////// class MoveOnly { #ifndef BOOST_NO_DELETED_FUNCTIONS public: MoveOnly(const MoveOnly&)=delete; MoveOnly& operator=(MoveOnly const&); #else private: MoveOnly(MoveOnly&); MoveOnly& operator=(MoveOnly&); public: #endif MoveOnly() { } #ifndef BOOST_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES MoveOnly(MoveOnly&&) {} #else #if defined BOOST_THREAD_USES_MOVE MoveOnly(boost::rv<MoveOnly>&) {} MoveOnly& operator=(boost::rv<MoveOnly>&) { return *this; } operator ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>&() { return *static_cast< ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>* >(this); } operator const ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>&() const { return *static_cast<const ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>* >(this); } ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>& move() { return *static_cast< ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>* >(this); } const ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>& move() const { return *static_cast<const ::boost::rv<MoveOnly>* >(this); } #else #error #endif #endif void operator()() { } };

3 5

[quickbook] Controling the layout of table columns in docbook/fo output
by Andreas Pokorny 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

Hi, In an earlier thread I mentioned that I am using quickbook to write software design specification/documentation. The whole document grows nicely now. Since more people are contributing, I added howto chapters to the end of the document, including some kind of guided quickbook skeleton for new chapters and the quickbook documentation itself. The quickbook documentation creates warnings with fop: Mar 12, 2012 8:11:46 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent WARNING: table-layout="fixed" and column-width unspecified => falling back to proportional-column-width(1) (See position 1686:869) Mar 12, 2012 8:11:46 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent WARNING: table-layout="fixed" and column-width unspecified => falling back to proportional-column-width(1) (See position 1686:905) Mar 12, 2012 8:11:46 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent WARNING: table-layout="fixed" and column-width unspecified => falling back to proportional-column-width(1) (See position 1896:796) and more. That happens for every table. Inside the documentation about tables there one containing hello world source. There the proportional column width makes the source code leave the table and text area of the page. Is there a yet undocumented way to control column sizes? regards Andreas

2 4

Re: [boost] [utility] Adding noexcept to boost::declval
by Michel Morin 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote >> Summary: >> Defining declval<T>() as add_lvalue_reference<T>::type is wrong; >> add_lvalue_reference should be removed! >> >> > There is something that disturb me by returning just T, doesn't this forces > the type T to CopyConstructible? Nope. T needs not to be CopyConstructible (Note that declval can be used only in unevaluated contexts.) > The idea to use T& instead was to avoid > this. You shouldn't do this, because this transforms rvalues to lvalues. > I have rolled back at revision 77562. Thanks, Vicente! Minor issue: `#include <boost/type_traits/add_lvalue_reference.hpp>` is not removed yet. Regards, Michel

2 1

[filesystem] Heads up; filesystem in trunk unstable while V2 removed
by Beman Dawes 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

To ensure that history is preserved, the removal of version 2 will be done as three commits. Filesystem in trunk will be unstable during until all three commits are completed. Hopefully this will take less than an hour. I'll post a notice when complete. --Beman

3 7

[gsoc]
by Andrew Sutton 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

It looks like there will be no summer of Code for Boost this year. For whatever reason, Google has decided not to accept Boost as a mentoring organization. Andrew

10 18

Re: [boost] [utility] Adding noexcept to boost::declval
by Michel Morin 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

(Forgot to send to the list; now back to the list again.) Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote: > OK, I will rollback it and analyze the breaking change. The important thing is that declval<T>() should preserve the constness/non-constness and the rvalueness/lvalueness of T. Essentially, it's OK to define declval<T>() as simply T. Then, why declval<T>() is defined as add_rvalue_reference<T>::type? This is because * When declval<T>() is defined as T, we cannot use abstract types as T. * When declval<T>() is defined as T&&, we cannot use void as T. The definition with add_rvalue_reference<T>::type also allows to use incomplete types as T. In C++03, it is not possible to construct rvalues of abstract types or incomplete types. So, the correct way to define declval<T>() in C++03 is to just use T. And this is the definition of declval<T>() in the previous version of boost::declval when BOOST_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES is defined. Summary: Defining declval<T>() as add_lvalue_reference<T>::type is wrong; add_lvalue_reference should be removed! Regards, Michel

1 0

Re: [boost] [gsoc]
by Andrzej Krzemienski 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

> From an outside point of view, i do agree. I don't see a lot of Boost GSOC > projects completed. And that's really disapointing. > In my fileds of interests, i would love to see some libraries integrated > that deals with : > - large integer / large fixed point computation > - json parser/ writer > - xml parser/ writer like pugiwml > - crossplatform async file io for boost asio (not only for windows) > - xmpp/sip stack Boost does provide parsers and writers for JSON and XML files. See http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/doc/html/property_tree.html. Regards, &rzej

2 1

how to mark a test "fail*"
by lcaminiti 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

Hello all, Expected regression test failures are marked with "fail*" and give an explanation for why the failure is expected: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/output/Sandia-intel-… How do I add an explanation for a new expected failure? Is there some documentation on this process? For example, emulation_this and emulation_this_tpl are expected to fail on MSVC8 and the user should use native type-of for those-- how do I add a link with such explanation the regression test table? http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/output/VC8%20jc-bell… http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/output/VC8%20jc-bell… Thanks a lot! --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-how-to-mark-a-test-fail-tp4503985p… Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

[mpi] all_reduce and MPI_IN_PLACE like feature
by Alain O Miniussi 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

Hi, MPI_Allreduce offers the possibility to use the same buffer for the send and recv data: http://www.open-mpi.org/doc/v1.4/man3/MPI_Allreduce.3.php#toc8 It seems that boost's all_reduce does not allow such a feature. First, I would like to know if the previous statement is correct and, if yes, if it was just overlooked or if there was a reason for that? Just in case, I filed a ticket regarding that issue, along with a tentative patch, in https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6704 Regards, Alain

1 0

Using C++11 lambdas to replace Phoenix in MPL expressions
by Augustus Saunders 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

I use Phoenix to essentially turn code into types which can then be manipulated through MPL. I mostly use this to conditionally select algorithms or to include/exclude code at compile time, based on some logic written with MPL. I was interested in writing the code fragments using the new C++11 lambda expressions as it gives a more natural way to write code. While you can get the type of a lambda expression with decltype, the problem I've run into is instantiating the resultant type in order to actually get the function to execute. Lambdas have no default constructor, which makes sense, as there would be no way to deal with the capture variables. So I'm wondering if anybody can shed some light on manually instantiating lambdas. I would think there is a way (possibly shady) to do this, at least for lambdas with no capture. Then passing around lambda types as template parameters would be useful, which I think would lead to many interesting results. I only get the digest, so it I would appreciate it if you CC me on any response. Thanks- Augustus

3 6

[lexical_cast][random] ADL problem with gcc c++11
by Joel de Guzman 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

Hi, I can't get this to compile on gcc-4.6.1 with -std=c++0x flag: #include <boost/random.hpp> int main() { return 0; } I'm getting an error in lexical_cast: C:\dev\boost/boost/lexical_cast.hpp:1323:120: error: there are no arguments to 'swprintf' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'swprintf' must be available [-fpermissive] Obviously, I can compile with -fpermissive, but I'd like to report this anyway. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com

5 7

Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
by David Greene 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

Edward Diener <eldiener(a)tropicsoft.com> writes: >> Also back to the point - DVCS are written to provide best possible >> support for merging. This makes 1) or 2) you propose above very >> efficient. In SVN or other centralized systems it is not so, just look >> up the bit I left from Joel's message above. > > I do not believe for even a second that any product can do merging of > the same source file automatically and flawlessly. This strawman keeps resurfacing. No one has claimed than any VCS can avoid manual merging at times. A centralized VCS needs to operate as you outlined: >> Bu how is this different from: >> >> 1) Creating a local SVN repository and importing some branches from >> another SVN repository. >> >> and/or >> >> 2) Having one's own branch of an SVN repository as one's own. #1 is a horribly manual operation. I don't know if you quite grasp how complicated it is. I've been doing it for years. Getting the history preserved correctly is not trivial. #2 has almost no support in SVN. Now that SVN has merge tracking it is marginally better but there are problems with this model. Foremost, the branch has to be in a centralized repository and everyone owkring on the project has to deal with it in some fashion. It's not private in any sense of the word. You can't work on it if you don't have 'net access. You can't back out changes that you realized later were bad and ensure no one else ever sees those changes. The difference with a DVCS is both #1 and #2 are natively supported in the tool. There is no difference between a private local branch, a remote branch in a _de_facto_ central repository and a remote branch in some other random repository. They all look and act the same. I admit it is a tough concept to grasp for someone not used to it. It took me some time to grok it. But now it is second-nature to me and there's no way I'm going back. -Dave

3 4

[config] Why does BOOST_NO_STD_LOCALE imply BOOST_NO_STD_WSTREAMBUF?
by Yechezkel Mett 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

I have found the following in config/suffix.hpp: // // We can't have a working std::wstreambuf if there is no std::locale: // # if defined(BOOST_NO_STD_LOCALE) && !defined(BOOST_NO_STD_WSTREAMBUF) # define BOOST_NO_STD_WSTREAMBUF # endif What is the reasoning behind this? My problem is that I am using Windows CE 6.0 with the supplied standard library, and it has no <locale>, yet still seems to provide a working wstreambuf. The effect is that I can't get boost::wformat, which is annoying, considering that the WinCE API uses only wide characters. I have checked that removing this line works. Is there any way to undefine BOOST_NO_STD_WSTREAMBUF without modifying the source? Yechezkel Mett

1 0

Re: [boost] [Boost-commit] svn:boost r77506 - in trunk: boost/property_map libs/property_map/doc libs/property_map/test
by Michel Morin 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

> Author: jewillco > Date: 2012-03-23 15:35:52 EDT (Fri, 23 Mar 2012) > New Revision: 77506 > URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/77506 […] > --- (empty file) > +++ trunk/boost/property_map/function_property_map.hpp 2012-03-23 […] > +#ifndef BOOST_PROPERTY_MAP_FUNCTION_PROPERTY_MAP_H > +#define BOOST_PROPERTY_MAP_FUNCTION_PROPERTY_MAP_H […] > +#endif /* BOOST_PROPERTY_MAP_FUNCTION_PROPERTY_MAP_H */ s/H/HPP > +template<typename Func, typename Key, typename Ret = typename boost::result_of<Func(Key)>::type> > +class function_property_map: public put_get_helper<Ret, function_property_map<Func, Key, Ret> > { […] > + typedef Ret reference; […] > + reference operator[](const Key& k) const { > + return f(k); > + } > + > + reference operator[](const Key& k) { > + return f(k); > + } […] > + private: > + Func f; > +}; In const version of the subscript operator, `f` is treated as `const Func`. So `reference` might not be appropriate for its return type. You can avoid this issue by making `f` mutable. Or, how about defining the default template argument of `Ret` as `boost::result_of<const Func(Key)>::type` and removing non-const version of the subscript operator? (Since property maps are often passed around by values, it makes less sense to allow stateful functors in `function_property_map`, IMHO.) Regards, Michel

2 2

Re: [boost] Please advise: Boost with LLVM Clang and 0x11 dialect ?
by Steve Ramsey 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

On Mar 21, 2012, at 1:35 AM, "John M. Dlugosz" <mpbecey7gu(a)snkmail.com> wrote: > Can someone please advise on how to get Boost headers to work when compiling using Clang (as found on Apple OSX/iOS development) when the 0x11 dialect is enabled? > > We're stuck at Boost 1.47 because 1.48 doesn't even work with the current settings (C++03 dialect). The Mac developers don't want to fiddle with 1.49 without knowing what the deal is. > > Is there someone who has used Boost on the Apple with Clang who can relate some tales of how it works and offer suggestions? I've had no luck on the Boost.Users mailing list, or a previous post here on Boost.Devel. Is there anyplace else I might ask? At this point, any scrap of wisdom would be appreciated. It's not an automatic process, but once the initial effort is spent, it works beautifully. I should point out that I use both C++11 and libc++, and I ended up making a number of changes to boost build files to get various features working. The biggest problem is the lack of support in tools/build/v2/tools/clang-darwin.jam for specifying the SDK/platform for cross-compiling. My solution since boost 1.47 has been to replace it with a modified copy of tools/build/v2/tools/darwin.jam; if I thought this was going to be an issue for anywhere near as long as it has, I would've sent in a patch half a year ago (aside: do any of the maintainers actually use boost on OS X?). An additional complication is that as of Xcode 4.3, variant toolchains are stored in a different location and use a slightly different directory structure; a nice solution would be to support a build feature to indicate this and respond accordingly; I just hardcode for Xcode 4.3+. I'm happy to send you diffs off-list if you're interested, but it's frankenhacks all the way down until I get around to making a clean patch file for clang-darwin.jam. Steve P.S. The only source/header file with a problem is libs/signals/src/named_slot_map.cpp, which is trivially fixable.

2 1

[filesystem] [svn] How to remove V2 files without loss of V3 history?
by Beman Dawes 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

The boost/filesystem directory currently looks like this: v2 config.hpp // actual header convenience.hpp exception.hpp fstream.hpp operations.hpp path.hpp v3 config.hpp // actual header convenience.hpp exception.hpp fstream.hpp operations.hpp path.hpp config.hpp // forwards to v2/config.hpp or v3/config.hpp convenience.hpp exception.hpp fstream.hpp operations.hpp path.hpp It is time to remove the dual version support. What I'd like to do is: * create a branch, * switch to it, * delete the top level forwarding headers, * move the v3 headers up to boost/filesystem, * delete the v2 and v3 directories, * modify the headers as needed, * merge back to trunk. At the completion of the merge, the history for the boost/filesystem headers should include the full history of what were the boost/filesystem/v3 headers. What are the svn commands to accomplish that? Thanks, --Beman

6 15

[utility] Adding noexcept to boost::declval
by Michel Morin 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

Now that we have BOOST_NOEXCEPT macro, it is reasonable to add noexcept to boost::declval (by means of BOOST_NOEXCEPT). As a note, std::declval is marked as noexcept. I made a ticket with a patch here: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6570 If it looks sensible, could someone apply the patch? Regards, Michel

1 1

interprocess with unordered_map
by Joel Young 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

>> Folks, I've built a unordered_map in a memory mapped file. The map goes from: typedef boost::interprocess::allocator< char, boost::interprocess::managed_mapped_file::segment_manager > char_allocator_t; typedef boost::interprocess::basic_string< char, std::char_traits<char>, char_allocator_t > typedef std::pair< key_type, pay_type> val_type; typedef boost::interprocess::allocator< val_type, boost::interprocess::managed_mapped_file::segment_manager> allocator_t; typedef boost::unordered_map< key_type, pay_type, boost::hash<key_type>, std::equal_to<key_type>, allocator_t> map_type; Everything works fine on creation. But when I later go to read from the map in a different program where the mapped file is opened read only, I have to do gymcrackery like: // A temporary string that allocates from the mapped file struct shm_clean { // cleanup shared memory on stack-unwind shm_clean() { boost::interprocess::shared_memory_object::remove("StupidSharedMemory"); } ~shm_clean() { boost::interprocess::shared_memory_object::remove("StupidSharedMemory"); } } cleaner; boost::interprocess::managed_shared_memory stupid(boost::interprocess::create_only ,"StupidSharedMemory" ,500); key_type key_val(stupid.get_segment_manager()); to create a temporary to allow me to search since the maps find() method will only take a key_type and interprocess::basic_string WILL NOT implicitly construct from a std::string, nor will it implicitly construct from a char* to itself. Can the interprocess::basic_string be modified to allow these conversions? I hate having to do: key_val = "fruitcake"; db.find(key_val); Suggestions? Thanks! Joel

4 18

[config] PGI config file doesn't defines BOOST_HAS_THREADS
by Vicente J. Botet Escriba 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

There is an issue on Boost.Thread regression test for PGI compiler. See https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6354. "pgCC" -INLINE:none -Kieee -fpic -fPIC -gopt -Minform=warn -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_TEST_NO_AUTO_LINK=1 -DBOOST_THREAD_POSIX -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_DLL=1 -D__need_IOV_MAX -I".." -c -o "/scratch/kbelco/boost/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/thread/test/test_barrier.test/pgi-11.9/debug/threading-multi/test_barrier.o" "../libs/thread/test/test_barrier.cpp" "../boost/config/requires_threads.hpp", line 86: catastrophic error: #error directive: "Compiler threading support is not turned on. Please consult your compiler's documentation for the appropriate options to use" # error "Compiler threading support is not turned on. Please consult your compiler's documentation for the appropriate options to use" boost/config/compiler/pgi.hpp defines BOOST_HAS_PTHREADS but not BOOST_HAS_THREADS, resulting in failure in the requires_threads.hpp header. It seems that adding #define BOOST_HAS_THREADS inboost/config/compiler/pgi.hpp solves the issue. John, what do you think? Could I add it? Best, Vicente

3 5

Re: [boost] DCVS vs CVS: call for constructivism
by Gottlob Frege 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

I have a question for the git (or hg) people. Maybe the concrete situation will shed some light on some of the issues (or maybe I'll just get some help and stop pulling what's left of my hair out). I'm working on code.cpp and morecode.cpp. At the same time, I am writing scripts like review.sh (makes git work better with code collaborator) and, say, custom_make.bat. I am going back and forth on these as needed. In particular, as the cpp files get in shape I commit, and maybe post something for review. We leads me to change review.sh. Or as I get things working, I modify custom_build.bat. To me, once done, these are separate commits/branches/features/changelists (whatever you want to call them). But while working on them, I don't want to flip between branches - I find I'm always changing something in the wrong branch when I try separate branches. ie I change code.cpp while in the "scripts" branch. And it is often more than 2 things I am working on. And sometimes (not usually) they are at least somewhat related - ie code.cpp depends on yourstuff.h, and I need to make a small fix in yourstuff.h. In the end, that fix will be separate, but until i know it is correct, it tends to stay mixed with my other work. Now maybe the dependency case is different, I don't know. (obviously at the end of the day, the order of dependent changes needs to be pushed correctly). So basically, in something like perforce, I can group the files into changelists, and then forget about it until something is completely done and ready to commit. I understand I'm losing other features (small commits, being able to easily set it all aside, etc), but this is my common workflow. Should I do everything on a messy "work" branch and just sort it out when I am ready to push? Should I keep the features in separate branches, but pull from branch to branch all the time? (I don't think I want to spend that much time with the RCS. I like forgetting about it most of the time.) Am I just doing it wrong? (And did any of this make any sense?) Tony Sent from my portable Analytical Engine

5 4

[typeof] MSVC errors on PGI?
by lcaminiti 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

Hello all, I'm getting compiler errors when using Boost.Typeof on PGI (plus these errors seems to be from Boost.Typeof for MSVC?). It's the first time I try to use PGI... what am I doing wrong? // File: 01.cpp #include <boost/typeof/typeof.hpp> int main() { int x = 0; BOOST_TYPEOF(x) y = x; return y; } $ pgcpp -I ../../.. 01.cpp "../../../boost/typeof/msvc/typeof_impl.hpp", line 150: error: class "boost::type_of::msvc_extract_type<ID>::id2type [with ID=ID]" cannot be defined in the current scope struct base_type::id2type // This uses nice VC6.5 and VC7.1 bugfeature ^ "../../../boost/typeof/msvc/typeof_impl.hpp", line 160: error: incomplete type is not allowed typedef typename id2type::type type; ^ detected during instantiation of class "boost::type_of::msvc_typeid_wrapper<ID> [with ID=5]" at line 6 of "01.cpp" 2 errors detected in the compilation of "01.cpp". BTW, I'm trying to use PGI to get ScopeExit regression tests to all pass on this compiler. PGI users-- any help is welcome! --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-typeof-MSVC-errors-on-PGI-tp449921… Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

René Eng möchte chatten
by René Eng 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

----------------------------------------------------------------------- René Eng möchte einige der neuen Google-Produkte verwenden, um mit Ihnen besser in Kontakt zu bleiben. Wenn Sie schon Google Mail oder Google Talk verwenden, besuchen Sie: http://mail.google.com/mail/b-4122791ae-68c38cb068-RejaciDzcqGQypwAD-y35NwA… Klicken Sie auf diesen Link, um mit René Eng chatten zu können. Um Google Mail - ein kostenloses E-Mail-Konto von Google mit mehr als 2800 Megabyte Speicherplatz - zu erhalten und mit René Eng zu chatten, besuchen Sie: http://mail.google.com/mail/a-4122791ae-68c38cb068-RejaciDzcqGQypwAD-y35NwA… Google Mail bietet: - Instant Messaging direkt in Google Mail - Leistungsstarken Spamschutz - Integrierte Suche nach E-Mails und praktische Möglichkeiten, E-Mails in "Konversationen" zu ordnen - Keine Pop-up-Anzeigen oder nicht zielgerichtete Banner - nur Textanzeigen und Informationen, die für den Inhalt Ihrer E-Mails relevant sind Alle diese Funktionen erhalten Sie kostenlos. Aber das ist noch nicht alles! Wenn Sie sich für ein Google Mail-Konto registrieren, erhalten Sie auch Zugriff auf Google Talk, den Instant Messaging-Dienst von: http://www.google.com/talk/intl/de/ Google Talk bietet: - Einen webbasierten Chat, den Sie überall verwenden können, ohne dass ein Download erforderlich ist - Eine mit Ihrem Google Mail-Konto synchronisierte Kontaktliste - Kostenlose, qualitativ hochwertige Sprachanrufe von Computer zu Computer, wenn Sie den Google Talk-Client herunterladen Von Zeit zu Zeit fügen wir immer wieder neue Funktionen zu Google Talk hinzu und nehmen weitere Verbesserungen vor, weshalb wir Sie möglicherweise regelmäßig um Kommentare und Vorschläge bitten. Wir danken Ihnen für Ihre Hilfe bei der Optimierung unserer Produkte! Vielen Dank! Ihr Google Team Weitere Informationen zu Google Mail und Google Talk erhalten Sie unter: http://mail.google.com/mail/help/intl/de/about.html http://www.google.com/talk/intl/de/about.html Wenn das Klicken auf die URLs in dieser E-Mail nicht funktioniert, kopieren Sie sie und fügen Sie sie in die Adressleiste Ihres Browsers ein.

1 0