July 2010 - Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

[msm] nested pseudo exits with same event ending up in no trans in the most outer state machine.
by Christophe Henry 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

>Hi All > >I have run in to the following problem : >if I have 3 state machines where 1st has a composite state which has >one more composite state than the most inner one enters to a pseudo >exit state which sends finish event. >The middle one has a transaction from the most inner pseudo exit with >even finish to a pseudo exit middle state which sends finish again. >The most outer state machine has a transition from the middle pseudo >exit with event finish to a internal state. >when the most inner pseudo state sends event finish it ends in a NO >transition on the most outer state machine instead of triggering the >transition in the middle state machine. <snip> Hi Richard, Remove these lines: //struct test1 : msm::back::state_machine< test1Sm > //{ //}; //typedef test1 Test1Player; And replace them with: typedef msm::back::state_machine< test1Sm > Test1Player; And it should work. Regards, Christophe

2 2

preprocessor library
by Wolf Lammen 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hi, Within the last two weeks, I submitted two patches to boosts ticket system, one correcting a bug in the preprocessor library, one slightly extending a macro improving symmetry when converting list types. I spotted more dubious code in the library, for example, I could easily remove hundreds of lines of dead code from preprocesser/seq/fold_left.hpp, and simplify BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOLD_LEFT saving between 15% and 90% of its execution costs (measured in macro replacements), depending on the input. When submitting the patches I followed the instructions on the bug reporting page of boosts web site. There has been no reaction so far. Did I get something wrong? Would like to learn how patches like these are going to be handled. with kind regards Wolf Lammen -- GMX DSL: Internet-, Telefon- und Handy-Flat ab 19,99 EUR/mtl. Bis zu 150 EUR Startguthaben inklusive! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

2 1

[mpl] Request for permission to merge a minor change to release
by Daniel Walker 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hi all, I just noticed a missing include in boost/mpl/has_xxx.hpp and committed a fix to trunk. https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/64144 May I please merge this changeset to release? Daniel Walker

2 1

Michael Herchel is ooo.
by Michael.Herchel＠rohde-schwarz.com 18 Jul '10

18 Jul '10

Ihre Nachricht betreffend: / Your Mail about: Boost Digest, Vol 2975, Issue 2 Ich werde ab 16.07.2010 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 26.07.2010. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. I am on vacation and will be back in the office on 26.07.2010. I will reply your email as soon as I am back.

3 2

[msm] nested pseudo exits with same event ending up in no trans in the most outer state machine.
by Richard Szabo 17 Jul '10

17 Jul '10

Hi All I have run in to the following problem : if I have 3 state machines where 1st has a composite state which has one more composite state than the most inner one enters to a pseudo exit state which sends finish event. The middle one has a transaction from the most inner pseudo exit with even finish to a pseudo exit middle state which sends finish again. The most outer state machine has a transition from the middle pseudo exit with event finish to a internal state. when the most inner pseudo state sends event finish it ends in a NO transition on the most outer state machine instead of triggering the transition in the middle state machine. please find the sample code to reproduces the problem and execution output in attachment to . a part of the execution output : leaving: Stopped entering: Playing entering: Playing::PseudoEntry1 leaving: Playing::PseudoEntry1 entering: test1Sm::initial leaving: test1Sm::initial entering: test1Sm::TestPseudoExit1 no transition from state 1 on event struct `anonymous namespace'::finish Is it a bug or I'm doing something wrong ?. Br. Richie

1 0

Help with patch
by Christian Henning 17 Jul '10

17 Jul '10

Hi there, this is probably offtopic but I need some help with applying a patch for boost::gil. First of all, I don't have much experience with patch and I need to change that. I read some tutorials online on how to patch with subversion and it seems pretty straightforward. I did some little testing myself and everything works as expected. Nice tool, I like it! Now, my first real life try with patch and I'm running into a problem immediately. I get this error with subversion: --------------------------- TortoiseMerge --------------------------- The patch seems outdated! The file line TIFF *_tp; and the patchline TIFF *_tp; do not match! --------------------------- OK --------------------------- The patch file was send to boost mailing list and maybe some lines got shifted by a whitespace but I cannot really tell. I uploaded that patch file here: http://code.google.com/p/gil-contributions/source/browse/trunk/gil_fix/tiff… Could someone tell me what's wrong with that patch file and how to fix it? Thanks, Christian

2 4

[range] permission to merge
by Neil Groves 17 Jul '10

17 Jul '10

Please may I merge changes to Boost.Range to add overloads to various Range functions to better support the use with temporary results? These changes have been tested on the trunk over the last three days without issue. Regards, Neil Groves

3 2

Michael Herchel is ooo.
by Michael.Herchel＠rohde-schwarz.com 17 Jul '10

17 Jul '10

Ihre Nachricht betreffend: / Your Mail about: Boost Digest, Vol 2975, Issue 1 Ich werde ab 16.07.2010 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 26.07.2010. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. I am on vacation and will be back in the office on 26.07.2010. I will reply your email as soon as I am back.

1 0

Bug in boost graph library
by Arne Schwabe 17 Jul '10

17 Jul '10

Hello, first I do not if this is the right list. I new to the boost mailling lists. I found a bug in the edge_range function of adjancency list. I condensed a short example. When compiled with MSVC 9 and Debug settings I get a debug assertion, "sequence not ordered". From my understanding the edge_range function needs the stored edge list to be sorted for the std::equal_range function. If I inspect "c" with the debugger the edges are not sorted but in the same order as they were added to the graph. Arne P.S.: If this not the right place for reporting bugs can you point to the right bug tracker/etc?

3 5

Michael Herchel is ooo.
by Michael.Herchel＠rohde-schwarz.com 16 Jul '10

16 Jul '10

Ihre Nachricht betreffend: / Your Mail about: Boost Digest, Vol 2974, Issue 3 Ich werde ab 16.07.2010 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 26.07.2010. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. I am on vacation and will be back in the office on 26.07.2010. I will reply your email as soon as I am back.

1 0