June 2008 - Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

[system] boost compilation
by simonvifr＠voila.fr 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

Hello, I contact you because an error occurs when compiling the "system" library with the following command prompt : bjam --with-system --toolset=intel --debug-configuration stage The intel compiler seems to be invoked correctly (see mail below). The message error is : error_code.cpp libs\system\src\error_code.cpp(90): error: namespace "std" has no member "strerror" const char * c_str = std::strerror( ev ); ^ compilation aborted for libs\system\src\error_code.cpp (code 2) My OS version is Windows XP. My boost version is 1.35.0 My boost-jam version is 3.1.16-1 (ntx86) My intel compiler version is 10.1.021 Thank you for your answer to fix this error. Regards. > Message du 29/06/08 à 16h30 > De : "Vladimir Prus" <ghost(a)cs.msu.su> > A : simonvifr(a)voila.fr > Copie à : boost-build(a)lists.boost.org > Objet : Re: [Boost-build] boost compilation > > > On Sunday 29 June 2008 18:14:43 simonvifr(a)voila.fr wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > It is now ok for running the icl.exe in the same command prompt. > > However the following command prompt generate errors : bjam --with-system --toolset=intel stage > > I have then added "--debug-configuration" but I have still errors when executing the command prompt : bjam --with-system --toolset=intel --debug-configuration stage > > > > The error messages are : > > > > error_code.cpp > > libs\system\src\error_code.cpp(90): error: namespace "std" has no member "strerror" > > const char * c_str = std::strerror( ev ); > > ^ > > compilation aborted for libs\system\src\error_code.cpp (code 2) > > Okay, so it appears that the intel compiler is invoked correctly, and then reports > an error of the source code itself. At this point, I don't think it's Boost.Build > issue, but either issue with the Boost.System library, or the Intel compiler -- I > suggest you ask at boost(a)lists.boost.org, making sure "[system]" is in email subject. > > > An other error message is : > > > > notice: [cmdline-cfg] Detected command-line request for intel: toolset= intel version= > > notice: [cmdline-cfg] toolset intel not previously configured; attempting to auto-configure now > > What makes you think this is an error message -- it is not. > > - Volodya > ____________________________________________________ Sur le mail Voila, vous pouvez personnaliser l’anti-spam ! http://mail.voila.fr

2 1

[system] LWG issue 805 name changes applied
by Beman Dawes 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

The C++ committee's LWG issue 805 has been applied to Boost.System in trunk, using a namespace and enum as a workaround for non-availability of C++ scoped enums. This changes names: posix_errno -> errc posix_category -> generic_category get_posix_category -> get_generic_category "POSIX" -> "GENERIC" The old names are still supported as deprecated synonyms, so virtually no existing code is expected to break. The changes tested OK locally on Windows against Boost.Filesystem and Boost.ASIO. Let me know if any problems arise. Thanks, --Beman

3 2

error_code and error_category problem
by Berserker 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

In my project (using asio) I have something like this: void Foo::myCallback(const boost::system::error_code &e) { if(e == boost::asio::error::operation_aborted) { // bla bla... } } This call is made across a shared dll and I notice that for a "strange" reason e == boost::asio::error::operation_aborted was always false. I discover that when the temporary object boost::system::error_code is constructed from the constants boost::asio::error::operation_aborted the error_code's costructor take a pointer to a "error_category" and the comparison operator is (m_cat is an error_category pointer): inline friend bool operator==( const error_code & lhs, const error_code & rhs ) { return lhs.m_cat == rhs.m_cat && lhs.m_val == rhs.m_val; } In my situation (using shared modules) lhs.m_cat == rhs.m_cat points to differents memory regions (even if are of the same type "system_category") because of the static initialization in the function "get_system_category". The problem exist in the comparison operator of error_category too: bool operator==(const error_category & rhs) const { return this == &rhs; } I suggest to change the comparison criteria (for example using an enumerated value) _________________________________________________________________ Sai che con Messenger guardi la TV con i tuoi amici? http://www.messenger.it/messengertv.html

2 1

[interprocess] Bug in os_file_functions.hpp
by Lars Hagström 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

Hi, I've just tried to use the file_locks from the boost trunk, and stumbled across a bug (well, two related bugs, really) when using the try_lock* metods. The problem occurs on linux systems only. The try_acquire_file_lock_sharable and try_acquire_file_lock functions both have the following code in them: int ret = ::fcntl(hnd, F_SETLK, &lock); if(ret == -1){ return (errno != EAGAIN && errno != EACCES) ? acquired = false, true : false; } I believe this should be changed into int ret = ::fcntl(hnd, F_SETLK, &lock); if(ret == -1){ return (errno == EAGAIN || errno == EACCES) ? acquired = false, true : false; } (its the errno checking line that is changed) Without my fix the result of trying to lock a lock that someone else has is an exception. Cheers Lars

2 2

Re: [boost] [exception] - bug in tutorial -> member 'what' is ambiguous?
by Kowalke Oliver (QD IT PA AS) 30 Jun '08

30 Jun '08

Hi, I revering to http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/exception/doc/tutorial_transporti… First example: class my_error: public boost::exception<http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/exception/doc/exception.html>, public std::exception { }; //(2) This code line produces the error. Oliver On 6/18/08, Kowalke Oliver (QD IT PA AS) <Oliver.Kowalke <at> qimonda.com> wrote: > Yes I used the latest documentation from trunk: > Tutorial: Transporting of Abritrary Data to the Catch Site: > > class my_error : public boost::exception , std::exception {); > > Does not work with gcc-4.2.4 (compiler bug?). What exactly doesn't work on gcc-4.2.4? All of the examples from the documentation are in this folder: http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/exception/example/ The examples compile with msvc and gcc 4.3.1. I also looked at http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/exception/doc/transporting_data.h… I don't see a reference to what() in it. Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Kowalke Oliver (QD IT PA AS) <Oliver.Kowalke <at> qimonda.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using boost.exception from trunk and I get following error (gcc-4.2.4): > > > > error: request for member 'what' is ambiguous > > /usr/include/c++/4.2/exception:64: error: candidates are: virtual > > const char* std::exception::what() const > > /opt/boost/include/boost-1_35/boost/exception/exception.hpp:52: error: > > virtual const char* boost::exception::what() const > > > > I'm using the code from the boost.exception tutorial: > > > > class error > > : > > public boost::exception, > > public std::exception > > {} > > > > ... > > try > > {...} > > catch ( error const& e) > > { std::cout << "error: " << e.what() << std::endl; } > > Where do you read the tutorial you are mentioning? Is it possible that it is out of date? The latest documentation can be accessed directly through the subversion web interface: > > http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/exception/doc/boost-exception.html. > > Emil Dotchevski > Reverge Studios, Inc. > http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

2 3

[spirit] Deprecation warnings, can they be turned off?
by Rene Rivera 30 Jun '08

30 Jun '08

In doing a top-level build of Boost (trunk) I'm seeing many messages like this one: ./boost/spirit/core/composite/actions.hpp:15:4: warning: #warning "This header is deprecated. Please use: boost/spirit/include/classic_actions.hpp" In file included from libs/serialization/src/basic_xml_grammar.ipp:22, from libs/serialization/src/xml_wgrammar.cpp:243: Two questions: * Is this something to worry about that the Serialization lib, and perhaps others, are using the deprecated headers? * Assuming Serialization, other libraries, and users want to use the old headers. Is there a way for them to turn off the warning? I don't see anything obvious from looking at the headers themselves. In a world where compiling Boost produces many warnings already in some platforms. It seems bad if we are adding even more onto the fray. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail

3 5

Need help with Boost:Serialization!
by Daniel Kunz 30 Jun '08

30 Jun '08

Hi, I'm very new at Boost and want to develop a project for school with the Boost:Serialization package. I've already read the documantation and serveral other sources. I'm not very good in programming C++, so please excuse that my code looks not perfect. I hope it's ok that I've posted some sourcecode. I've tried to keep it short... *My problem:* I have to create a program to serialise and deserialse a xml-file to a binary-stream. I think to binary stream is already done but the xml-serialisation is not ready and I don't know whats wrong. I have 3 classes: Goal ------------ class Goal { private: enum Scored{home=0, visitors=1}; friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & name; ar & minute; ar & shootout; ar & scored; ar & penality; } string name; int minute; bool shootout; Scored scored; bool penality; public: Goal(){}; Goal(const string _name, int &_minute, bool &_shootout, Scored &_scored, bool &_penality); ~Goal(){}; friend ostream & operator<<(ostream &os, const Goal &_goal); }; --------------- Stadium --------------- class Stadium { private: friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & name; ar & city; ar & spectators; } string name; string city; int spectators; public: Stadium(){}; Stadium(const string _name, const string _city, int &_spectators); friend ostream & operator<<(ostream &os, Stadium &_stadium); }; ---------------- and Match ---------------- class Match { private: friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & home; ar & visitors; ar & kickoff; /*lGoals::const_iterator pos; for (pos = goals.begin(); pos != goals.end(); pos++) { ar & pos; }*/ ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(goals); ar & stadium; } string home; string visitors; time_t kickoff; typedef list<Goal> lGoals; lGoals goals; Stadium stadium; public: Match(){}; Match(const string _home, const string _visitors, time_t &_kickoff, Goal _goals[100], Stadium &_stadium); Match& operator = (Match &_match); friend ostream & operator<<(ostream &out, Match &_match); }; ---------------- Now I have to serialise this classes in an xml structure. Therefor I've created the file xml.h/.cpp. I only post the xml.cpp here: ---------------- #include <iomanip> #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <string> #include "goal.h" #include "stadium.h" #include "match.h" #include <boost/serialization/base_object.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/utility.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/list.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/is_abstract.hpp> #include <boost/archive/xml_iarchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/xml_oarchive.hpp> //Tracing and Logging module //#include "Logger.h" //#include "Tracer.h" using namespace std; /** * \brief Fuction to Deserialise a xml-file to an object structure * \param const Match &m, const string &filename * \return void */ void save_xml(const Match &m, const string &filename){ // make an archive ofstream ofs(filename.c_str()); boost::archive::xml_oarchive oa(ofs); //fill data to archive oa <<BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(m); ofs.flush(); } /** * \brief Fuction to Serialise an object structure to a xml-file * \param Match &m, const string &filename * \return void */ void restore_xml(Match &m, const string &filename) { // open the archive ifstream ifs(filename.c_str()); boost::archive::xml_iarchive ia(ifs); //restore the data from the archive ia >>BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(m); } ---------------- So thats it and I hope its not all wrong I tried. I hope you can help me finish that project. Thanks!

3 6

[date_time] Documentation Fix (time_period)
by Bryan Petty 30 Jun '08

30 Jun '08

Hi, Attached is a quick patch to switch the placement of the time_period(ptime,ptime) and time_period(ptime,time_duration) examples to their correct locations. Regards, Bryan Petty

2 2

Trac "search" link doesn't work
by Phil Endecott 30 Jun '08

30 Jun '08

Hi All, I've just found that if I go to http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ and click on the "search" link (2nd level of the indented list, "search first to avoid creating duplicates"), I get a 404. It links to http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/trac/boost/search?ticket=on; it should be missing one of the "trac/boost"s. The search box at the top of the page does work though. (Isn't there a link checker somewhere that looks for this sort of thing?) Phil.

2 1

[serialization] Thread safety question.
by Jurko Gospodnetić 30 Jun '08

30 Jun '08

Hi. Some pages on the web (e.g. http://www.rrsd.com/boost/index.htm) and some old news posts seem to indicate that the current trunk version version to be included with Boost 1.36 makes the library 'thread safe'. What exactly does that entail? Can two separate archives be created in two separate threads? Was that not also true with the version included in the Boost 1.35 library release? Many thanks. Best regards, Jurko Gospodnetić

2 1