Confused about the Boost.Build documentation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3be5/f3be52e83aa25868237d5318d46413253480d5b3" alt=""
Hello, I wanted to read the doc of Boost.Build, but I find two documentations : 1. One from the link I can find on this page : http://www.boost.org/doc/ (at the booton, or at the bottom right corner, in th menu) 2. One I found throught from Google : http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/doc/html/bbv2.html I am not able to find it by navigating on the Boost site. Which page is the godd one ? Thanks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48064/48064d72b0cc2a7ace5789b3da09cb4b9f086523" alt=""
AMDG On 10/30/2015 04:56 PM, Oodini wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to read the doc of Boost.Build, but I find two documentations :
1. One from the link I can find on this page : http://www.boost.org/doc/ (at the booton, or at the bottom right corner, in th menu)
This actually links to the most recent version of the latter.
2. One I found throught from Google : http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/doc/html/bbv2.html I am not able to find it by navigating on the Boost site.
Which page is the godd one ?
They're essentially the same. In Christ, Steven Watanabe
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48064/48064d72b0cc2a7ace5789b3da09cb4b9f086523" alt=""
AMDG On 11/01/2015 02:13 PM, Oodini wrote:
De: "Steven Watanabe"
I wanted to read the doc of Boost.Build, but I find two documentations :
Which page is the godd one ?
They're essentially the same.
So why does Boost keep both ?
The boost site has the documentation of every release. Notice the 1_59_0 in http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/doc/html/bbv2.html? There's also a 1_58_0 and a 1_57_0, etc.
It is troublesome.
In Christ, Steven Watanabe
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3be5/f3be52e83aa25868237d5318d46413253480d5b3" alt=""
The boost site has the documentation of every release. Notice the 1_59_0 in http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/doc/html/bbv2.html? There's also a 1_58_0 and a 1_57_0, etc.
So why is it not referenced on the page http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/ ?
participants (2)
-
Oodini
-
Steven Watanabe