interested to know your opinion on possible feature

Hello all,
I have one issue, which I would like to discuss here.
In my current project is a need to implement an optional type, this type is considered to be lazy.
I am wondering why C++ or Boost do not offer this possibility.
These are just some thoughts which are really not perfect, but an opinion and interest would be
highly appreciated:
template

Ovanes Markarian wrote:
In my current project is a need to implement an optional type, this type is considered to be lazy. I am wondering why C++ or Boost do not offer this possibility.
In what way does Boost.Optional fail to meet your needs? Sebastian Redl
participants (2)
-
Ovanes Markarian
-
Sebastian Redl