[CONFIG] static const definitions
On 2/27/2013 1:23 PM, boost-users-request-at-lists.boost.org |Boost/Allow to home| wrote:
Exactly, hence my suggestion for performing a preprocessor check around the out-of-line definition. I suppose it would be nice to have a BOOST-y preprocessor def that could let you know if this is the case... OK, now we're getting somewhere. You understand that this is exactly what I _am_ doing. My questions is, how does Boost determine which compilers in which it should withhold the definition? Do you know of an example of one someplace?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:12 PM, John M. Dlugosz
On 2/27/2013 1:23 PM, boost-users-request-at-lists.boost.org |Boost/Allow to home| wrote:
OK, now we're getting somewhere. You understand that this is exactly what I _am_ doing. My questions is, how does Boost determine which compilers in which it should withhold the definition? Do you know of an example of one someplace?
Unfortunately, no. We manage our own testing based on the compilers we use (actually, we only have to worry about this in the case you mentioned). I think it would be great to have a boost macro to test. If no one else is aware of a readily-available macro in boost config, maybe you can log a bug and provide a patch to get the ball rolling? Brian
participants (2)
-
Brian Budge -
John M. Dlugosz