Boost license / OSI approved
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0f10/a0f10bce04efcd146ad7d71b9eefe19bc7ae4398" alt=""
Hi there, I noticed that the Boost license is not listed as an OSI approved license (see here: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical ). Why is this ? The license seems to nicely comply with the Open Source definition, from what I can see (see http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd). http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ lists it as GPL-compatible. Best Regards, Ruediger
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4e66/b4e6618abd88571690777d58d3e735c7f53bb18c" alt=""
on Wed Sep 26 2007, Ruediger Berlich
Hi there,
I noticed that the Boost license is not listed as an OSI approved license (see here: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical ). Why is this ?
The license seems to nicely comply with the Open Source definition, from what I can see (see http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd).
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ lists it as GPL-compatible.
See http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/msg/643e5618c0f7574e Also this thread: http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c46F85E80.3090302%40gatech.... It doesn't seem very promising... :( -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a48a6/a48a6baf71f1d2c16288e617fca9aaea905d534c" alt=""
On Monday 01 October 2007 14:25:44 David Abrahams wrote:
See http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/msg/643e5618c0f7574e Also this thread: http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c46F85E80.3090302%40gatech .edu%3e
WOW .... just WOW. It is unfortunate to see an organization that is supposed to look out for the collective good resort to what can only be described as a power trip. For the record, I am not a lawyer, but the Boost license is as free as free can be. There are so many OSI-approved licenses that I am not able to use, yet I have never had any trouble getting the BSL approved by my employers. My standard for good C++ software requires that Boost is used. Unless I am desperate, I will reject C++ projects from any usage consideration unless they make use of the highly-regarded Boost libraries. If OSI cannot accept BSL, then that indicates that there are serious problems with OSI. Perhaps it is time for a new "trademark" ... is BOSI (Boost Open Source Initiative) already taken? The motto could read "BOSI is Better than OSI" :-) Justin
participants (4)
-
David Abrahams
-
Felipe Magno de Almeida
-
KSpam
-
Ruediger Berlich