"Pierre-Jules Tremblay" <iamtrep@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4590bfef0707230842t2e296753g9546b73e2de8cc25@mail.gmail.com... Just for my personal culture, given that your object will have a vtable anyway, what's wrong with a virtual dtor() ?

Cheers,

Nothing really. It just doesn't have to be. If by any chance the design will change, I do not want destructor to be the only virtual function. Gennadiy