I asked the original question that sparked this, and its because (at the
root) I want to know whether feature requests need to be mirrored on the
main boost list. So if I can be sure that the author of the library is at
least listening to my boost-users message, I don't have to CC him/her or
spam both lists. That is why I wanted access to the members, and as a
support mechanism, why I thought it was important for boost-users.
I realize membership != reading the messages, so perhaps my point is moot.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim.Hyslop [mailto:jim.hyslop@leitch.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:20 AM
To: 'Boost-Users@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: [Boost-Users] Subject: Poll results for Boost-Users
When the question first came up of allowing members to view
Chris Little [SMTP:clittle@renlearn.ca] wrote:
the membership
list, one of the moderators started a poll (around the beginning of
January).
That'd be me.
Unfortunately polling in this group is limited to moderators.
The moderators then decided to discuss the issue amongst
themselves and
they
haven't reported back.
Hoo, boy, I seem to have dropped the ball on several counts here.
First, my apologies for not cancelling the poll after
discovering polling
was limited to moderators.
Second, my apologies for not reporting back to the group on
the results of
our discussion (I'm taking responsibility for this, since I'm
the one who
opened the can of worms in the first place).
We identified a potential problem with spam email harvesting.
Granted, in
the public pages emails are hidden, so that only the first
letter of the
domain appears (my address, for example, would appear as
"jim.hyslop@l..."
One of the moderators pointed out:
About half of the email addresses on
the first page start with either an a, h, or y.
... the problem is that when harvesting email addresses you
don't need 100% accuracy. Just assume that a's are aol, all b's are
bigfoot, all e's are earthlink, all h's are hotmail.com,
and all y's
are yahoo.com. These letters are going to be [greater than]
half the list
and you
will be correct [greater than] half the time.
We could not come up with any compelling arguments in favour
of opening the
list. I believe the best summary was:
I'm not sure what the benefits of public membership would be.
Arguments such as "I need to know if X is a member of
the group" seem empty - this is a *mailing list* after all.
To access individuals, you should get hold of them in
other ways. If they are active members of the list, you'll
still know they're members.
No moderators actually spoke out in favour of opening the
list up, so the
status quo remains.
We moderators are, of course, open to suggestions, and if a reasonably
strong argument comes up, then we will re-examine the issue.
If anyone feels
strongly about it, you can either post your rationale here or
email the
moderators at boost-users-owner@yahoogroups.com (the
'boost-users-owner'
name is a bit misleading - email goes to all moderators, not
just to the
owner).
Similarly, on the topic of polls themselves, the general
consensus was that
if or when we identify a good reason to run a poll, then we
will open up the
feature. Until then, there's no reason to change the status quo.
--
Jim
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
---------------------~-->
Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
Order Now! FREE VCR Commander!
Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/nuyOHD/7.PDAA/yigFAA/EbFolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------~->
Info: http://www.boost.org
Wiki: http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl
Unsubscribe: mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
bill_kempf
Duane Murphy
Tom Matelich