Hi. I'm not sure if this is correct list for quickbook matters. When using two links side by side eg [link x] [link y] in the qbk source, the resulting html puts no space between the two links. Is there a way around this? Quickbook is great BTW ! regards Andy Little
Andy Little wrote:
Hi. I'm not sure if this is correct list for quickbook matters.
When using two links side by side eg [link x] [link y] in the qbk source, the resulting html puts no space between the two links. Is there a way around this?
Quickbook is great BTW !
For future reference, boost-docs@lists.sourceforge.net is the place for QuickBook bug reports. In this case, it looks like the XML pretty-print routine is confused again about what whitespace is significant and what isn't. I'm tempted to just disable it by default. Instead, I just added an option to disable it: --no-pretty-print. That'll work around your problem until we fix it, and should give people a fail-safe in the future in case the pretty-printer acts up again. Joel, can you have a look at this when you get a chance? -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
HI Andy, Eric, Eric Niebler wrote:
Andy Little wrote:
Hi. I'm not sure if this is correct list for quickbook matters.
When using two links side by side eg [link x] [link y] in the qbk source, the resulting html puts no space between the two links. Is there a way around this?
Quickbook is great BTW !
Thanks!
For future reference, boost-docs@lists.sourceforge.net is the place for QuickBook bug reports.
In this case, it looks like the XML pretty-print routine is confused again about what whitespace is significant and what isn't. I'm tempted to just disable it by default. Instead, I just added an option to disable it: --no-pretty-print. That'll work around your problem until we fix it, and should give people a fail-safe in the future in case the pretty-printer acts up again.
Joel, can you have a look at this when you get a chance?
Fixed. Actually, it's not the post-processor's bug, but rather, a bug in the code that handles nbsp. It's just that the post processor takes advantage of the "proper" handling of nbsp to simplify parsing of the xml (i.e. it expects a certain form passed to it). Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
"Joel de Guzman" wrote
Fixed. Actually, it's not the post-processor's bug, but rather, a bug in the code that handles nbsp. It's just that the post processor takes advantage of the "proper" handling of nbsp to simplify parsing of the xml (i.e. it expects a certain form passed to it).
Great! I'll use proper list next time. regards Andy Little
Hi, How can I uninstall Boost library? I try "make uninstall" but there is no target named 'uninstall' in the Makefile. And if I need to update Boost library, do I need to uninstall first before installing it. Thank you. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
yinglcs2@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
How can I uninstall Boost library? I try "make uninstall" but there is no target named 'uninstall' in the Makefile.
You mean the makefile produced by the new configure script? Best you can do is use the 'clean' target. Other than that uninstalling is as easy as just deleting the include directory and the libs generated.
And if I need to update Boost library, do I need to uninstall first before installing it.
No. The install is designed to not clobber old versions, as is the build and library names. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
participants (5)
-
Andy Little -
Eric Niebler -
Joel de Guzman -
Rene Rivera -
yinglcs2＠yahoo.com