Passing boost::archive::no_header as the second parameter to xml_oarchive() yields the following file for given test: <picogen-qt-scene class_id="0" tracking_level="0" version="0"> <comment>hello world!</comment> <fenum>two</fenum> </picogen-qt-scene> Unfortunately, "<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>" is now missing, too. For now, I am really not sure if I will use this part of boost, though I admit the overall greatness of it. 2009/8/26 Sebastian Mach

It seems like "boost::archive::no_header" is the right flag to construct xml_[io]archive with, though I can't test this right now as I can't install boost on this box.

2009/8/26 Sebastian Mach

Good morning everyone

...

I'd like to use boost::serialization for the generation of xml-files. The format of those files shall not be specific to or dependent of boost, i.e. I'd like boost to not write the root-node of "".

E.g., instead of

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?> <!DOCTYPE boost_serialization> <picogen-qt-scene class_id="0" tracking_level="0" version="0"> <comment>hello world!</comment> <fenum>two</fenum> </picogen-qt-scene>

I would prefer

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?> <picogen-qt-scene class_id="0" tracking_level="0" version="0"> <comment>hello world!</comment> <fenum>two</fenum> </picogen-qt-scene>

. I wonder if this is possible without tweakage of boost components (meaning that I would have to fork or write patches). I tried the serialization-documentation and google, but could not find appropriate information (or maybe I missed the right words).

Best Regards

Sebastian Mach http://picogen.org

2009/8/27 Matthias Troyer

On Aug 26, 2009, at 7:15 PM, Sebastian Mach wrote:

Passing boost::archive::no_header as the second parameter to

...

xml_oarchive() yields the following file for given test:

<picogen-qt-scene class_id="0" tracking_level="0" version="0"> <comment>hello world!</comment> <fenum>two</fenum> </picogen-qt-scene>

Unfortunately, "<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>" is now missing, too.

Can't you just write this to the file yourself?

Of course, but it feels a little bit unclean. The other reason I did not mention (sorry, really bad wording from my side) is that xml in general does not feel dedicated enough to what I need, i.e. it's too verbose in the end (I have lots of 3d/4d-vectors and 4x4 matrices, complex recursive/cyclic/self referencing graphs, and so forth, and it should be human readable and writable). I think I will use a custom format that I already had in the past, and go use spirit once again to build a kiss-conformat serialization framework.