Building boost with codegear rad studio 2007
Hi: Has any one built boost 1.36 with codegear rad studio 2007. I there a codegear.jab file. Is not what would I do to create one? Cheers Sean. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3357 (20080814) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Hi: Wioll I need to rebuild python, to build with borland compilers or not? Cheers Sean. -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of John Maddock Sent: 15 August 2008 11:45 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building boost with codegear rad studio 2007 Sean Farrow wrote:
Hi: Has any one built boost 1.36 with codegear rad studio 2007. I there a codegear.jab file. Is not what would I do to create one?
Use the "borland" toolset. HTH, John. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3358 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3358 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Sean Farrow wrote:
Hi: Wioll I need to rebuild python, to build with borland compilers or not?
If you want to use Boost.Python then yes I expect so for sure, if you don't want to use Boost.Python then no: just ignore any errors from that particular Boost library during the build. HTH, John.
Sean Farrow wrote:
Hi: Wioll I need to rebuild python, to build with borland compilers or not?
I don't think you stand any chance of recompiling Python with any Borland/CodeGear compiler without a significant porting effort. However this is not necessary if you don't need to use Boost.Python. It should be sufficient to either add a user-config.jam file to your home directory or modify the une under tools\build\v2 and add a line like the following: using borland : 5.9.3 : "C:/Program Files/CodeGear/RAD Studio/5.0/Bin/bcc32" ; One place to look for Borland/CodeGear specific Boost information is http://bcbboost.sourceforge.net , but there's nothing there about 1.36 yet. Hope this helps. Cheers, Nicola -- Nicola.Musatti <at> gmail <dot> com Home: http://nicola.musatti.googlepages.com/home Blog: http://wthwdik.wordpress.com/
Hi: It does help, I'm going through the trunk, and sorting out warnings! Is there a way of building completely, but telling boost.python not to build? Cheers Sean. -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Nicola Musatti Sent: 16 August 2008 14:21 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building boost with codegear rad studio 2007 Sean Farrow wrote:
Hi: Wioll I need to rebuild python, to build with borland compilers or not?
I don't think you stand any chance of recompiling Python with any Borland/CodeGear compiler without a significant porting effort. However this is not necessary if you don't need to use Boost.Python. It should be sufficient to either add a user-config.jam file to your home directory or modify the une under tools\build\v2 and add a line like the following: using borland : 5.9.3 : "C:/Program Files/CodeGear/RAD Studio/5.0/Bin/bcc32" ; One place to look for Borland/CodeGear specific Boost information is http://bcbboost.sourceforge.net , but there's nothing there about 1.36 yet. Hope this helps. Cheers, Nicola -- Nicola.Musatti <at> gmail <dot> com Home: http://nicola.musatti.googlepages.com/home Blog: http://wthwdik.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3360 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3360 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
on Sat Aug 16 2008, "Sean Farrow"
Hi: It does help, I'm going through the trunk, and sorting out warnings! Is there a way of building completely, but telling boost.python not to build?
Try --without-python on your bjam command line. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Hi: When using the following command line, it still builds with msvc: Bjam toolset=borland --build-type=complete What is the problem here? Cheers Sean. -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of John Maddock Sent: 15 August 2008 11:45 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building boost with codegear rad studio 2007 Sean Farrow wrote:
Hi: Has any one built boost 1.36 with codegear rad studio 2007. I there a codegear.jab file. Is not what would I do to create one?
Use the "borland" toolset. HTH, John. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3358 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3358 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Hi John, Sorted, cheers. It looks like some changes need to be made, for example I ge the message spirit 1.6 required to compile with this compiler, any ideas why? Is it worth joining the boost-developers list, if I'm making changes/patches, is yes how do I do this? Sean. -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of John Maddock Sent: 15 August 2008 16:32 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building boost with codegear rad studio 2007 Sean Farrow wrote:
Hi: When using the following command line, it still builds with msvc: Bjam toolset=borland --build-type=complete What is the problem here?
That should be --toolset=borland John. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3359 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3359 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Sean Farrow wrote:
Hi John, Sorted, cheers. It looks like some changes need to be made, for example I ge the message spirit 1.6 required to compile with this compiler, any ideas why? Is it worth joining the boost-developers list, if I'm making changes/patches, is yes how do I do this?
Borland's compiler can't cope with the current spirit code, and probably never will, sorry :-( You can of course build all the libraries that don't depend on Spirit without acquiring Spirit-1.6 (not sure, but I think it's just serialisation that requires Spirit). John.
Hi: What are the main issues with this compile and spirit? Cheers Sean. -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of John Maddock Sent: 15 August 2008 17:08 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building boost with codegear rad studio 2007 Sean Farrow wrote:
Hi John, Sorted, cheers. It looks like some changes need to be made, for example I ge the message spirit 1.6 required to compile with this compiler, any ideas why? Is it worth joining the boost-developers list, if I'm making changes/patches, is yes how do I do this?
Borland's compiler can't cope with the current spirit code, and probably never will, sorry :-( You can of course build all the libraries that don't depend on Spirit without acquiring Spirit-1.6 (not sure, but I think it's just serialisation that requires Spirit). John. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3359 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3359 (20080815) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
John Maddock wrote:
Sean Farrow wrote:
Hi: When using the following command line, it still builds with msvc: Bjam toolset=borland --build-type=complete What is the problem here?
That should be --toolset=borland
In fact, --toolset=borland and toolset=borland should be equivalent, with toolset=borland been a preferred spelling. I see no reason whatsoever why toolset=borland can cause a build to happen with msvc; at the very least I'd need the exact command line and exact output to diagnose this. Output of bjam invocation with extra --debug-configuration and --debug-building options will also be needed. - Volodya
participants (5)
-
David Abrahams
-
John Maddock
-
Nicola Musatti
-
Sean Farrow
-
Vladimir Prus