Shalom I've updated this page -- http://webEbenezer.net/comparison.html with results from Boost 1.52. A few notes about the testing: I decided to use -O2 on the Linux/g++ tests. In previous tests I used -O3. I hadn't updated the Windows test results since the Boost 1.48 time-frame. Around Boost 1.51 I had to start building the serialization library in Boost with runtime-link=static in order to get the Windows tests to build. I haven't understood why that became necessary, but the results for the serialization library in Boost seem to have been adversely affected by this. On Windows, I now report that tests built with the serialization library in Boost are over 1.8 times slower than parallel Ebenezer tests. Previously I reported the tests built with the serialization library in Boost were between 1.7 and 1.8 times slower than the Ebenezer tests. -- Brian Ebenezer Enterprises -- making programming fun again. http://webEbenezer.net