Minimal human-readable boost::serialization ?
I looks like the last time this was mentioned in this mailing list was in 2005. Has anyone considered anything like boost::archive::json_oarchive etc.? JSON looks easy to read in log files. I want name-value pairs in my serialization. But I don't want the verbosity of XML. I think JSON would be ideal.
Hello Eric,
Not specifically boost-related, but we're using the exact setup you describe
to store our log files using JsonCPP [http://jsoncpp.sourceforge.net/].
You would have to write wrappers for a Boost.Serialization-like approach to
storing and loading log files, but the library is very easy to understand
and well designed.
Regards,
Leon Mergen
On 3/3/08, Eric Newhuis
I looks like the last time this was mentioned in this mailing list was in 2005.
Has anyone considered anything like boost::archive::json_oarchive etc.? JSON looks easy to read in log files. I want name-value pairs in my serialization. But I don't want the verbosity of XML. I think JSON would be ideal.
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
-- Leon Mergen http://www.solatis.com
participants (2)
-
Eric Newhuis -
Leon Mergen