pimpl idiom implementation? - Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

newer
Limits in MPL and Fusion - bad...

pimpl idiom implementation?

older
[shared_ptr] Can the custom...

Chris Cleeland

8 Nov 2011 8 Nov '11

4:21 p.m.

In wanting to implement a few things using PIMPL I looked in boost for necessary structure. I found several things that use the idiom, but no formal unified implementation. I then stumbled across a Dr. Dobbs article, and the code at https://github.com/sean-/boost-pimpl Anybody know the status of that code and its potential for inclusion in boost? -- Chris Cleeland

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Marshall Clow

8 Nov 8 Nov

4:31 p.m.

On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Chris Cleeland wrote:

In wanting to implement a few things using PIMPL I looked in boost for necessary structure. I found several things that use the idiom, but no formal unified implementation.

I then stumbled across a Dr. Dobbs article, and the code at https://github.com/sean-/boost-pimpl

Anybody know the status of that code and its potential for inclusion in boost?

http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html shows that it has been proposed for review, but has no review manager, and is not scheduled. -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software mailto:mclow.lists@gmail.com A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). -- Yu Suzuki

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Chris Cleeland

4:58 p.m.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Marshall Clow wrote:

On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Chris Cleeland wrote:

...
Anybody know the status of that code and its potential for inclusion in boost?

http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html shows that it has been proposed for review, but has no review manager, and is not scheduled.

Ah, thanks! In looking at the review process docs, I'm not sure I'm qualified to serve as a review manager, though I'd be willing. Since I'm interested in using the lib, though, I might be better suited to being a reviewer rather than the manager. -- Chris Cleeland

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Dave Abrahams

8:16 p.m.

on Tue Nov 08 2011, Chris Cleeland wrote:

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Marshall Clow wrote:

...
On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Chris Cleeland wrote:

...
...
Anybody know the status of that code and its potential for inclusion in boost?

http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html shows that it has been proposed for review, but has no review manager, and is not scheduled.

Ah, thanks! In looking at the review process docs, I'm not sure I'm qualified to serve as a review manager, though I'd be willing. Since I'm interested in using the lib, though, I might be better suited to being a reviewer rather than the manager.

I think you need to send email to the developers' list or better the review wizards or even better the submitter if you want your offer to get any attention. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

4751

Age (days ago)

4751

Last active (days ago)

Download

3 comments

3 participants

tags

participants (3)

Chris Cleeland
Dave Abrahams
Marshall Clow