Carl Nygard wrote:

On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 14:09, Doug Gregor wrote:

...

On Nov 18, 2004, at 1:10 PM, Murray Cumming wrote:

...

I'm not in a position to do this at the moment, although possibly in the future. It would be *wonderful* if someone went off and studied both libraries in-depth to make this comparison, especially if that person was not intimately familiar with either library beforehand.

Available: http://www.3sinc.com/opensource/boost.bind-vs-sigc2.html

Updates for code samples from Chris Vine and Jonathan Brandmeyer will be forthcoming.

I could use some suggestions on how to incorporate common code into the code comparison tables.

And of course, any other comments, flames, etc. will be welcome. I'm only doing this as a service for keeping track of comments. I'd like to see some of this stuff make it into the C++ standard library.

In the just-released Boost 1.32, the Boost signals library does make a guarantee of the order of signals within a particular group. The order within a particular group is FIFO.