on Tue May 29 2007, "Matias Capeletto" wrote:

C++ is a different beast from Java, and the way to document the libraries is different too. I can give you the doxygen docs of my lib, Boost.Bimap. They are here: ( http://tinyurl.com/2pqytf ). But in the same way as other C++ libraries, the list of classes and functions is not the appropriate way to document it. Please look at ( http://tinyurl.com/22sja5 ) You can look for the reference there, that is not generated by doxygen. This kind of reference is the one used by other boost libraries like Boost.MultiIndex, and IMHO it is far superior to doxygen docs.

Wow, beautiful pictures. How did you make them? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com

on Wed May 30 2007, "Matias Capeletto" wrote:

With an object based image editor that lets me put shadows and apply transparencies.

What is it called?

If you are interested I did the following logos last year, feel free to use them...

* A possible Boost.Build v2 logo, based on the work of Vladimir Prus http://matias.capeletto.googlepages.com/boost.build.logo.png

* A possible Quickbook logo http://matias.capeletto.googlepages.com/boost.Quickbook.logo.png

* A possible Boost.Python logo http://matias.capeletto.googlepages.com/boost.python.logo.png

* A possible Boost.MultiIndex logo http://matias.capeletto.googlepages.com/boost.multi_index.logo.png

Very pretty. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com

-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Matias Capeletto Sent: 31 May 2007 05:19 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] unified documentation

On 5/31/07, David Abrahams wrote:

...

on Wed May 30 2007, "Matias Capeletto"

wrote:

...

...

With an object based image editor that lets me put

shadows and apply

...

...

transparencies.

What is it called?

PhotoImpact

You could also try Satori (www.satoripaint.com). It's getting old now, but can do most of what you see in the pictures. I'm biased of course, because I was in the team of two that wrote it, a few years ago.

Regards Matias _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender immediately.

On 5/31/07, Joel de Guzman wrote:

Matias Capeletto wrote:

...

On 5/30/07, David Abrahams wrote:

...

If you are interested I did the following logos last year, feel free to use them...

* A possible Boost.Build v2 logo, based on the work of Vladimir Prus http://matias.capeletto.googlepages.com/boost.build.logo.png

* A possible Quickbook logo http://matias.capeletto.googlepages.com/boost.Quickbook.logo.png

I like it! Pretty! Any chance for a Fusion logo ;-)

sure :)

...

I will try to make more in the future if people is interested.

Gennady:

I am trying to come up with Boost.Test logo. Any chance you can help? I've got some ideas. But I am more or less "graphically ignorant". If you up to it please contact me.

Tell me your idea an I give it a try. I have some ideas of my own about it if you are interested too. I will move this thread to Boost docs list. Best regards Matias

On 5/31/07, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

"Matias Capeletto" wrote in message news:e9b043a10705310703k71c9cb8cy6df293761aaf13e0@mail.gmail.com...

...

Tell me your idea an I give it a try. I have some ideas of my own about it if you are interested too.

I'll contact you offline if you don't mind.

Please do it Matias

Matias Capeletto wrote:

But in the same way as other C++ libraries, the list of classes and functions is not the appropriate way to document it. Please look at ( http://tinyurl.com/22sja5 )

I agree 100%. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net