RE: [Boost-users] Re: why so many .so and .a files for boost?
I was wondering why I get duplicates on my Linux box as well. The files are with 1_32 and without extension and they are exactly the same. Full debug/release install takes about 0.5G. This is a lot!! Pshemek -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Russell Hind Sent: 20 April 2005 09:09 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: [Boost-users] Re: why so many .so and .a files for boost? Rene Rivera wrote:
libboost_signals-gcc-1_32.a libboost_signals-gcc-1_32.so libboost_signals-gcc.a libboost_signals-gcc.so
'mutil-thread' and 'sigal-thread' support? What's the relationship between these versions and the compiler options like '-pthread' ?
Answers at.. http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started.html#Results
But why duplicates of each? On windows I get libboost_signals-bcb-1_32.dll and libboost_signals-bcb.dll Which are both the same. Why are there libraries without the version number in created? Cheers Russell _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users -------------------------------------------------------- If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ --------------------------------------------------------
Sliwa, Przemyslaw (London) wrote:
I was wondering why I get duplicates on my Linux box as well. The files are with 1_32 and without extension and they are exactly the same.
On any Unix I would expect those to be hardlinks to each other. Are you sure this is not the case? Markus
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Sliwa, Przemyslaw (London) wrote:
I was wondering why I get duplicates on my Linux box as well. The files are with 1_32 and without extension and they are exactly the same.
On any Unix I would expect those to be hardlinks to each other. Are you sure this is not the case?
Markus
On my Debian GNU/Linux installation, 2/3 of those files are symlinks. I think that's just for convenience, so instead of linking such longwinded names as libboost_filesystem-gcc-mt-1_32.so.1.32.0 you can just link to libboost_filesystem (which is a symlink to the former). Since Windoze doesn't have symlinks, I don't know how this handled there though. -- Matthias Kaeppler
participants (3)
-
Markus Schöpflin
-
Matthias Kaeppler
-
Sliwa, Przemyslaw (London)