Hello, I'm trying to convert an MPL map to a fusion map using
boost::fusion::result_of::as_map. I have the following code, with
some of the leading-in code omitted for brevity although I don't think
it's relevant:
//listener_info_types := mpl::list< pair
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Zachary Turner
Hello, I'm trying to convert an MPL map to a fusion map using boost::fusion::result_of::as_map. I have the following code, with some of the leading-in code omitted for brevity although I don't think it's relevant:
Heh, apparently all I need to do was
#include
AMDG Zachary Turner wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Zachary Turner
wrote: Hello, I'm trying to convert an MPL map to a fusion map using boost::fusion::result_of::as_map. I have the following code, with some of the leading-in code omitted for brevity although I don't think it's relevant:
Heh, apparently all I need to do was
#include
In the process I ran across the documentation for the mpl adapted sequences (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/libs/fusion/doc/html/fusion/adapted/mpl...). Is there any difference between using result_of::as_map and this approach? With the adapted approach, can I simply declare an mpl::map on the stack and modify its internal items at runtime?
An mpl::map doesn't store any data members. when it is viewed as a fusion sequence, the values are default constructed on the fly. In Christ, Steven Watanabe
participants (2)
-
Steven Watanabe
-
Zachary Turner