RE: [Boost-Users] HP, aCC and the standards

I would recommend contacting the aCC support people. They are generally quite reasonable. In fact, the hp status tables (which appear a bit out of date) at http://www.boost.org/status/cs-hpux.html are run remotely on a box provided by HP for boost to use. At the point when this was set up, I was investigating whether we should use aCC or g++. I went through and developed a few simple test cases to demonstrate the bugs in a few of the tests. They accepted them, but gave no time line. I think development of aCC was initially really hurt when Daveed Vandevoorde went to EDG, and I'd guess all the linux/compaq hubbub probably hasn't helped to much. I think A.03.33 was released over a year ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Information contained in this message and/or attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by return email. -----------------------------------------------------------------------

On Monday 03 February 2003 18:06, Tom Matelich wrote:
For an updated status-page, check out : http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/ and you see that aCC has the highest failure rate ! I also recently talked to an HP representative and he was under the impression that aCC was very confirming.
participants (2)
-
Tom Matelich
-
Toon Knapen