When I look at the boost page http://www.boost.org/doc/html/boost_tr1/unsupported.html I see the // [6.3.4.4] Class template unordered_map template > > class unordered_map; which matches the current definition. So it would be interesting to know which version of the standard library you're using. It it is widely used, I would be interested in making changes to maintain backward compatibility, but then I would need to know how to select which prototype to use. Robert Ramey Robert Ramey wrote:

Hmmm,

When I look into my MSVC 7.1 library I see the class declaration as it is in the serialization library.

When I look into SGI documentation, I see the declaration you've used.

So I'll guess this will be a little more work as the hash_map test will also need to be tweaked.

Just So I don't forget, how about opening a Trac Ticket on this.

Robert Ramey "Jan Boehme" wrote in message news:6b4335640712170254m3e93b390o3b39d7e7a50749c8@mail.gmail.com... Hi, I encountered problems while trying to serialize hash_maps which use pool allocators ( gcc: no member 'serialize' ). I had a look into "boost/serialization/hash_map.hpp" and realized a problem in the declaration of hash_map in here:

BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map should be

BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map

It seems that nobody used the hash_map with more than 4 template parameters together with boost::serialization before.

It would be nice, if the following changes for "boost/serialization/hash_map.hpp" would be adopted into the repos.

Cheers, Jan.

--- /boost-trunk/boost/serialization/hash_map.hpp 2007-08-01 09:03: 26.000000000 +0200 +++ /boost/serialization/hash_map.hpp 2007-12-17 11:36:27.000000000 +0100 @@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ class Archive, - class Key, + class Key, + class Value, class HashFcn, @@ -41,3 +42,3 @@ const BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > &t, @@ -48,3 +49,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > @@ -55,3 +56,4 @@ class Archive, - class Key, + class Key, + class Value, class HashFcn, @@ -63,3 +65,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > &t, @@ -70,3 +72,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator >, @@ -75,3 +77,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > @@ -85,3 +87,4 @@ class Archive, - class Key, + class Key, + class Value, class HashFcn, @@ -93,3 +96,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > &t,

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

I also had to use the following #defines to compile: -D__GLIBCPP__ -DBOOST_HAS_HASH -DBOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE=__gnu_cxx (And I had to patch hash_map.hpp) On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Joseph Turian wrote:

I have the same problem. I am using the implementation of hash_map that is default in Gentoo Linux (libstdc++ i think).

On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 1:21 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:

...

When I look at the boost page http://www.boost.org/doc/html/boost_tr1/unsupported.html

I see the

// [6.3.4.4] Class template unordered_map template > > class unordered_map;

which matches the current definition.

So it would be interesting to know which version of the standard library you're using. It it is widely used, I would be interested in making changes to maintain backward compatibility, but then I would need to know how to select which prototype to use.

Robert Ramey

Robert Ramey wrote:

...

Hmmm,

When I look into my MSVC 7.1 library I see the class declaration as it is in the serialization library.

When I look into SGI documentation, I see the declaration you've used.

So I'll guess this will be a little more work as the hash_map test will also need to be tweaked.

Just So I don't forget, how about opening a Trac Ticket on this.

Robert Ramey "Jan Boehme" wrote in message news:6b4335640712170254m3e93b390o3b39d7e7a50749c8@mail.gmail.com... Hi, I encountered problems while trying to serialize hash_maps which use pool allocators ( gcc: no member 'serialize' ). I had a look into "boost/serialization/hash_map.hpp" and realized a problem in the declaration of hash_map in here:

BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map should be

BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map

It seems that nobody used the hash_map with more than 4 template parameters together with boost::serialization before.

It would be nice, if the following changes for "boost/serialization/hash_map.hpp" would be adopted into the repos.

Cheers, Jan.

--- /boost-trunk/boost/serialization/hash_map.hpp 2007-08-01 09:03: 26.000000000 +0200 +++ /boost/serialization/hash_map.hpp 2007-12-17 11:36:27.000000000 +0100 @@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ class Archive, - class Key, + class Key, + class Value, class HashFcn, @@ -41,3 +42,3 @@ const BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > &t, @@ -48,3 +49,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > @@ -55,3 +56,4 @@ class Archive, - class Key, + class Key, + class Value, class HashFcn, @@ -63,3 +65,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > &t, @@ -70,3 +72,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator >, @@ -75,3 +77,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > @@ -85,3 +87,4 @@ class Archive, - class Key, + class Key, + class Value, class HashFcn, @@ -93,3 +96,3 @@ BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE::hash_map< - Key, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator + Key, Value, HashFcn, EqualKey, Allocator > &t,

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

-- Academic: http://www-etud.iro.umontreal.ca/~turian/ Business: http://www.metaoptimize.com/

-- Academic: http://www-etud.iro.umontreal.ca/~turian/ Business: http://www.metaoptimize.com/