1.34.0 release date? - Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

newer
[mpl] include order matters for...

1.34.0 release date?

older
Re: [Boost-users] random number...

james.jones＠firstinvestors.com

11 Aug 2006 11 Aug '06

1 p.m.

Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately? - James Jones Administrative Data Mgmt. Webmaster 375 Raritan Center Pkwy, Suite A Data Architect Edison, NJ 08837

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

David Abrahams

11 Aug 11 Aug

2:48 p.m.

writes:

Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?

Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Bronek Kozicki

3:14 p.m.

David Abrahams wrote:

http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.

I can add msvc-8 and msvc-7_1 (bjam v2) to my set of tests (32bit, not 64bit ones),. I'm also considering running tests on my other 64bit Linux machine (Ubuntu 6.06, dual-core AMD), compilers I have in mind are GCC 3.4.6 and 4.0.3 and maybe 4.1.1 , *if* there is some interest. B.

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Ovanes Markarian

3:36 p.m.

On Fri, August 11, 2006 17:14, Bronek Kozicki wrote:

David Abrahams wrote:

...
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.

I can add msvc-8 and msvc-7_1 (bjam v2) to my set of tests (32bit, not 64bit ones),. I'm also considering running tests on my other 64bit Linux machine (Ubuntu 6.06, dual-core AMD), compilers I have in mind are GCC 3.4.6 and 4.0.3 and maybe 4.1.1 , *if* there is some interest.

B.

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

I could do Windows part for XP Pro x64 for msvc-8, msvc-7_1 and mingw compiler if there is some interest. With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Victor A. Wagner Jr.

13 Aug 13 Aug

3:29 a.m.

At 08:48 2006-08-11, David Abrahams wrote:

writes:

...
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?

Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.

you wanna be so kind as to EXPLAIN the mistake I made?? I haven't touched that bzip junk in ages? IMO the mistake is in the way the scripts are updated and the fact that you guys NEVER mention that the testers must do somehting to accomodate the fact that you developers seem incapable of creating a "hands off" testing system.

-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

David Abrahams

11:48 a.m.

"Victor A. Wagner Jr." writes:

At 08:48 2006-08-11, David Abrahams wrote:

...
writes:

...
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?

Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.

you wanna be so kind as to EXPLAIN the mistake I made??

No, I don't. These were from Sean Wang's results, and the MSVC installation mistake was immediately apparent from looking at the error messages (now fixed so you can't see it).

I haven't touched that bzip junk in ages?

Don't know what that means.

IMO the mistake is in the way the scripts are updated and the fact that you guys NEVER mention that the testers must do somehting to accomodate the fact that you developers seem incapable of creating a "hands off" testing system.

Calm down, Victor. Boost can't be expected to be responsible for making it easier for anyone to correctly install development tools not provided by us. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Victor A. Wagner Jr.

15 Aug 15 Aug

5 a.m.

At 05:48 2006-08-13, David Abrahams wrote:

"Victor A. Wagner Jr." writes:

...
At 08:48 2006-08-11, David Abrahams wrote:

...
writes:

...
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?

Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/de veloper/issues.html (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.

you wanna be so kind as to EXPLAIN the mistake I made??

No, I don't. These were from Sean Wang's results, and the MSVC installation mistake was immediately apparent from looking at the error messages (now fixed so you can't see it).

Apologies. Given that there are exactly TWO msvc-8.0 testers (I didn't know a new one had shown up) and I couldn't find anything particularly different in my setup for several months it seems reasonable to believe the message was about _my_ testing setup.

...
I haven't touched that bzip junk in ages?

Don't know what that means.

well, if you looked at some of the red squares under RudbekAssociates msvc-8_0 and drill down iostreams it would be pellucidly clear.

...
IMO the mistake is in the way the scripts are updated and the fact that you guys NEVER mention that the testers must do somehting to accomodate the fact that you developers seem incapable of creating a "hands off" testing system.

Calm down, Victor. Boost can't be expected to be responsible for making it easier for anyone to correctly install development tools not provided by us.

Are you implying that the boost test and regression system is NOT provided by boost? Hmmm.

-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

David Abrahams

12:44 p.m.

"Victor A. Wagner Jr." writes:

...
...
IMO the mistake is in the way the scripts are updated and the fact that you guys NEVER mention that the testers must do somehting to accomodate the fact that you developers seem incapable of creating a "hands off" testing system.

Calm down, Victor. Boost can't be expected to be responsible for making it easier for anyone to correctly install development tools not provided by us.

Are you implying that the boost test and regression system is NOT provided by boost? Hmmm.

No, I'm implying we don't supply Visual C++, which is what is improperly installed on that system. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Zachary Drummond

16 Aug 16 Aug

3:38 p.m.

Does that mean 1_34_0 passs all the tests on msvc-8, or just that the report is inacurate for msvc-8? Thanks, -Zach On 8/11/06, David Abrahams wrote:

writes:

...
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?

Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here:

http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.

-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

David Abrahams

4:09 p.m.

"Zachary Drummond" writes:

Does that mean 1_34_0 passs all the tests on msvc-8, or just that the report is inacurate for msvc-8?

The latter. But that's fixed so the report should be accurate now. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Gennaro Prota

12 Aug 12 Aug

5:53 p.m.

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:00:52 -0400, wrote:

Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?

People working with financial data are usually good at seeing trends. Start your Mozilla Firefox, go to http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/08/subject.php and open all the mails with subject "[boost] Boost regression notification (2006-08-XX [RC_1_34_0])", each in a different tab. Then hold CTRL+TAB. That might give an idea. -- [ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer. Library designer ] [ For hire http://gennaro-prota.50webs.com/]

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

6666

Age (days ago)

6671

Last active (days ago)

Download

10 comments

7 participants

tags

participants (7)

Bronek Kozicki
David Abrahams
Gennaro Prota
james.jones＠firstinvestors.com
Ovanes Markarian
Victor A. Wagner Jr.
Zachary Drummond