Steven Watanabe writes:

On 04/25/2013 02:23 AM, Chard wrote:

...

Please can someone post me the mpl to reverse an mpl::set<>.

It's probably wrong to try to reverse an mpl::set. mpl::set doesn't guarantee that the elements appear in any specific order.

But I presume mpl::set has _an_ order; I do not require any specific order. I'll try another tack: can an mpl::set be converted to an mpl::vector?

Gabriel Redner writes:

...

I'll try another tack: can an mpl::set be converted to an mpl::vector?

typedef copy > >::type your_vector;

Thanks; that answers my original question, if reverse[_copy] is used: typedef typename reverse > >::type set_reversed_as_vector;