RE: [Boost-Users] Any luck with HP-UX 11i (11.11) using aCC 3.39
Thanks for the update Toon. I think we're going to migrate to the gcc compiler on HP-UX for all our future work. That or we're going to go with Linux and bag HP altogether. -----Original Message----- From: Toon Knapen [mailto:toon.knapen@fft.be] Sent: Friday, 27 June 2003 01:04 To: Boost-Users@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Boost-Users] Any luck with HP-UX 11i (11.11) using aCC 3.39
Has anyone had any luck building Boost 1.30.0 on HP-UX 11i (11.11) using the aCC version 3.39 compiler? The Compiler Status page for HP-UX lists the 5.38 version of aCC, but it looks like I'm having many of the same problems.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
First of all, I'm planning to sync the status pages on HP/aCC every day. But yes, the aCC compiler fails misereably on compiling boost. I've started to try to isolate code that is legal but can't be handled by the aCC compiler and send it to their experts. By exchanging such code-snippets we could improve our understanding of the (deficiencies of the) aCC compiler and improve portability of the boost libraries. So I'll end with the same line as your post : any help would be greatly appreciated. toon Info: http://www.boost.org Wiki: http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl Unsubscribe: mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Thanks for the update Toon. I think we're going to migrate to the gcc compiler on HP-UX for all our future work. That or we're going to go with Linux and bag HP altogether.
OK but nevertheless some related info : HP says that gcc only obtains 1/3th of the performance of aCC (never checked myself though). And you should also now that I tried to compile boost with gcc (oops it's not shown anymore on the status pages, I'll have to update it) and I had trouble compiling it (mostly to do with posix threads AFAICT). toon
participants (2)
-
Murray, Charlie H
-
Toon Knapen