On 16-10-19 02:57 AM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
I'm not the maintainer of boost.asio, so I don't know if an upgrade is planed - you might ask Christopher Kohlhoff.
This is a bit worrisome to me. We are using the Boost.Asio + Boost.Coroutine integration _extensively_ in our project. Did the API change from Coroutine1 to Coroutine2? Is it simply a matter of including from boost/coroutine2/xxx instead of boost/coroutine/xxx based on some preprocessor macro being defined?
2016-10-28 21:34 GMT+02:00 Emile Cormier
Did the API change from Coroutine1 to Coroutine2? Is it simply a matter of including from boost/coroutine2/xxx instead of boost/coroutine/xxx based on some preprocessor macro being defined?
The API is almost the same - boost.coroutine2 requires some C++11 features and uses namespace coroutine2.
participants (2)
-
Emile Cormier -
Oliver Kowalke