Hello, I'm sending this message a second time (I didn't receive any response and still have this problem) I'm using boost::bind and boost::signal with VC6. VC6 is detecting some memory leak for a certain type of signal.connect(). I've done a little test program to check if the problem was due to some bug or special configuration in my main program, but the memory leaks are still detected in the test situation. Let me explain the structure of my test program. I have a main, and in the main, an object CCloneAppRecipe named clone. The class CCloneAppRecipe contains a member m_PtrTestMem (a shared pointer, but a raw point or an object does the same thing) of the class CTestMem. CTestMem contains 3 instances of the class CTestTab, and the class CTestTab contains a boost signal typedef boost::signal0<void> TypeSignalTest; TypeSignalTest m_SignalTest; In my main, I invoke clone.connectPtrTestMem(). clone.connectPtrTestMem() then invokes CTestMem::ConnectSignalTriplePtrTab(boost::bind(&CloneAppRecipe::test, this)); ConnectSignalTriplePtrTab() then invokes ConnectSignal(TypeSignalTest::slot_type slot) for each of the 3 instances of the class it contains. ConnectSignal then calls m_SignalTest.connect(slot). And I have a memory leak: 2 blocks of 16 bytes. If I connect only one instance of CTestTab, no leak. Two instances, one leak of 16 bytes. Three, two leaks of 16 bytes, and so on. I connect the m_SignalTest with a CCloneAppRecipe's slot. If I connect it to a CTestMem slot, I have no leak. Or if I place 3 instances of CTestTab directly in the CCloneAppRecipe class (so I don't use CTestMem anymore), I have no leak. But that's not what I need to do. I've tested plenty of variations (shared_pointer or object, etc.) Does anybody have a clue. Thanks #include "stdafx.h" #include "CloneAppRecipe.h" #ifdef _DEBUG #define new DEBUG_NEW #undef THIS_FILE static char THIS_FILE[] = __FILE__; #endif int main() { CloneAppRecipe t; // cree un leak t.connectPtrTestMem(); getchar(); return 0; } void CloneAppRecipe::connectPtrTestMem() { //m_ptrTestMem is a boost::shared_ptr m_ptrTestMem->ConnectSignalTriplePtrTab(boost::bind(&CloneAppRecipe::test, this)); } void CloneAppRecipe::test() const { } void CTestMem::ConnectSignalTriplePtrTab(const TypeSignaTest::slot_type& slot) { //m_ptrTestTab are boost::shared_ptr m_ptrTestTab1->ConnectSignal(slot); m_ptrTestTab2->ConnectSignal(slot); m_ptrTestTab3->ConnectSignal(slot); } void CTestTab::ConnectSignal(const TypeSignalTest::slot_type& slot) { m_SignalTest->connect(slot); } CTestTab::~CTestTab() { m_SignalTest->disconnect_all_slots(); }
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:32:18 -0300, Elisabeth Benoit <elisabeth.benoit@polymtl.ca> wrote:
I'm using boost::bind and boost::signal with VC6. VC6 is detecting some memory leak for a certain type of signal.connect(). I've done a little test program to check if the problem was due to some bug or special configuration in my main program, but the memory leaks are still detected in the test situation.
You should send a _complete_ program that shows the problem to the list, so that we hace a chance to figure out what's wrong. Regards, Bruno
Hi, Thanks for answering. I don't know if the message you got was incomplete (cause I've included my test program in my message), but here is the complete version. The test program is at the end. If you need more details, please ask. Elisabeth memory leaks with signal::connect() by Elisabeth Benoit 2006-07-03 16:32 :: Reply | Show Only this Message :: Rate this Message: Hello, I'm sending this message a second time (I didn't receive any response and still have this problem) I'm using boost::bind and boost::signal with VC6. VC6 is detecting some memory leak for a certain type of signal.connect(). I've done a little test program to check if the problem was due to some bug or special configuration in my main program, but the memory leaks are still detected in the test situation. Let me explain the structure of my test program. I have a main, and in the main, an object CCloneAppRecipe named clone. The class CCloneAppRecipe contains a member m_PtrTestMem (a shared pointer, but a raw point or an object does the same thing) of the class CTestMem. CTestMem contains 3 instances of the class CTestTab, and the class CTestTab contains a boost signal typedef boost::signal0<void> TypeSignalTest; TypeSignalTest m_SignalTest; In my main, I invoke clone.connectPtrTestMem(). clone.connectPtrTestMem() then invokes CTestMem::ConnectSignalTriplePtrTab(boost::bind(&CloneAppRecipe::test, this)); ConnectSignalTriplePtrTab() then invokes ConnectSignal(TypeSignalTest::slot_type slot) for each of the 3 instances of the class it contains. ConnectSignal then calls m_SignalTest.connect(slot). And I have a memory leak: 2 blocks of 16 bytes. If I connect only one instance of CTestTab, no leak. Two instances, one leak of 16 bytes. Three, two leaks of 16 bytes, and so on. I connect the m_SignalTest with a CCloneAppRecipe's slot. If I connect it to a CTestMem slot, I have no leak. Or if I place 3 instances of CTestTab directly in the CCloneAppRecipe class (so I don't use CTestMem anymore), I have no leak. But that's not what I need to do. I've tested plenty of variations (shared_pointer or object, etc.) Does anybody have a clue. Thanks #include "stdafx.h" #include "CloneAppRecipe.h" #ifdef _DEBUG #define new DEBUG_NEW #undef THIS_FILE static char THIS_FILE[] = __FILE__; #endif int main() { CloneAppRecipe t; // cree un leak t.connectPtrTestMem(); getchar(); return 0; } void CloneAppRecipe::connectPtrTestMem() { //m_ptrTestMem is a boost::shared_ptr m_ptrTestMem->ConnectSignalTriplePtrTab(boost::bind(&CloneAppRecipe::test, this)); } void CloneAppRecipe::test() const { } void CTestMem::ConnectSignalTriplePtrTab(const TypeSignaTest::slot_type& slot) { //m_ptrTestTab are boost::shared_ptr m_ptrTestTab1->ConnectSignal(slot); m_ptrTestTab2->ConnectSignal(slot); m_ptrTestTab3->ConnectSignal(slot); } void CTestTab::ConnectSignal(const TypeSignalTest::slot_type& slot) { m_SignalTest->connect(slot); } CTestTab::~CTestTab() { m_SignalTest->disconnect_all_slots(); } _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users « Return to forum © 2005-2006 Nabble, Inc. FAQ - Powered by - Terms of Use - Nabble Support Selon Bruno Martínez <br1@internet.com.uy>:
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:32:18 -0300, Elisabeth Benoit <elisabeth.benoit@polymtl.ca> wrote:
I'm using boost::bind and boost::signal with VC6. VC6 is detecting some memory leak for a certain type of signal.connect(). I've done a little test program to check if the problem was due to some bug or special configuration in my main program, but the memory leaks are still detected in the test situation.
You should send a _complete_ program that shows the problem to the list, so that we hace a chance to figure out what's wrong.
Regards, Bruno
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 19:23:18 -0300, Elisabeth Benoit <elisabeth.benoit@polymtl.ca> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for answering. I don't know if the message you got was incomplete (cause I've included my test program in my message), but here is the complete version. The test program is at the end. If you need more details, please ask.
Sorry. What I meant was that you should include CloneAppRecipe.h, stdafx.h, and the rest of the source, so that we can run the program ourselves. If you take the time to make as small as possible example that shows the problem, you stand the greatest chance of getting help. Regards, Bruno
I'll do that first thing in the morning on monday (when I'm at the office). Thanks again Elisabeth Selon Bruno Martínez <br1@internet.com.uy>:
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 19:23:18 -0300, Elisabeth Benoit <elisabeth.benoit@polymtl.ca> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for answering. I don't know if the message you got was incomplete (cause I've included my test program in my message), but here is the complete version. The test program is at the end. If you need more details, please ask.
Sorry. What I meant was that you should include CloneAppRecipe.h, stdafx.h, and the rest of the source, so that we can run the program ourselves. If you take the time to make as small as possible example that shows the problem, you stand the greatest chance of getting help.
Regards, Bruno
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
here is my complete test program. // TestMemBis.cpp : Defines the entry point for the console application. // #include "stdafx.h" #include "CloneAppRecipe.h" #ifdef _DEBUG #define new DEBUG_NEW #undef THIS_FILE static char THIS_FILE[] = __FILE__; #endif int main() { CloneAppRecipe t; // cree un leak t.connectPtrTestMem(); getchar(); return 0; } // CloneAppRecipe.h: interface for the CloneAppRecipe class. // ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// #if !defined(AFX_CLONEAPPREC__INCLUDED_) #define AFX_CLONEAPPREC__INCLUDED_ #if _MSC_VER > 1000 #pragma once #endif // _MSC_VER > 1000 #include "TestMem.h" class CloneAppRecipe { public: CloneAppRecipe(); ~CloneAppRecipe(); private: // desactive constructeur copie et operateur= CloneAppRecipe( const CloneAppRecipe& rhs ); CloneAppRecipe& operator=( const CloneAppRecipe& rhs ); // slot pour connecter void test() const; public: void connectPtrTestMem(); boost::shared_ptr<TestMem> m_ptrTestMem; }; #endif // CloneAppRecipe.cpp: implementation of the CloneAppRecipe class. // ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// #include "stdafx.h" #include "CloneAppRecipe.h" #include "TestTab.h" #ifdef _DEBUG #define new DEBUG_NEW #undef THIS_FILE static char THIS_FILE[] = __FILE__; #endif CloneAppRecipe::CloneAppRecipe() : m_ptrTestMem( new TestMem() ) { } CloneAppRecipe::~CloneAppRecipe() { } void CloneAppRecipe::test() const { } void CloneAppRecipe::connectPtrTestMem() { m_ptrTestMem->ConnectSignal(boost::bind(&CloneAppRecipe::test, this)); } // TestMem.h: interface for the TestMem class. // ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// #if !defined(AFX_TESTMEM__INCLUDED_) #define AFX_TESTMEM__INCLUDED_ #if _MSC_VER > 1000 #pragma once #endif // _MSC_VER > 1000 class TestTab; class TestMem { public: typedef boost::signal0<void> TypeSignalTest; TestMem(); ~TestMem(); void ConnectSignal(const TypeSignalTest::slot_type& slot) const; private: // desactive constructeur copie et operateur= TestMem( const TestMem& rhs ); TestMem& operator=( const TestMem& rhs ); boost::shared_ptr<TestTab> m_ptrTestTab1; boost::shared_ptr<TestTab> m_ptrTestTab2; boost::shared_ptr<TestTab> m_ptrTestTab3; }; #endif // !defined(AFX_VISIONPARAMTABMANAGER_H__F0F26B98_D7D0_489E_AD5F_0DDEBF9A2D4F__INCLUDED_) // TestMem.cpp: implementation of the TestMem class. // ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// #include "stdafx.h" #include "TestMem.h" #include "TestTab.h" #ifdef _DEBUG #define new DEBUG_NEW #undef THIS_FILE static char THIS_FILE[] = __FILE__; #endif TestMem::TestMem() : m_ptrTestTab1( new TestTab() ), m_ptrTestTab2( new TestTab() ), m_ptrTestTab3( new TestTab() ) { } TestMem::~TestMem() { } void TestMem::ConnectSignal(const TypeSignalTest::slot_type& slot) const { m_ptrTestTab1->ConnectSignal(slot); m_ptrTestTab2->ConnectSignal(slot); m_ptrTestTab3->ConnectSignal(slot); } // VisionParamGenericTab.h: interface for the CVisionParamGenericTab class. // ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// #if !defined(AFX_TEST_TAB) #define AFX_TEST_TAB #if _MSC_VER > 1000 #pragma once #endif // _MSC_VER > 1000 typedef boost::signal0<void> TypeSignalTest; class TestTab { public: TestTab(); ~TestTab(); void ConnectSignal(const TypeSignalTest::slot_type& slot); private: // desactive constructeur copie TestTab( const TestTab& rhs ); TestTab& operator=( const TestTab& rhs ); TypeSignalTest m_SignalTest; }; #endif // TestTab.cpp: implementation of the TestTab class. // ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// #include "stdafx.h" #include "TestTab.h" #ifdef _DEBUG #define new DEBUG_NEW #undef THIS_FILE static char THIS_FILE[] = __FILE__; #endif TestTab::TestTab() { } TestTab::~TestTab() { m_SignalTest.disconnect_all_slots(); } void TestTab::ConnectSignal(const TypeSignalTest::slot_type& slot) { m_SignalTest.connect(slot); } // stdafx.h : include file for standard system include files, // or project specific include files that are used frequently, but // are changed infrequently // #if !defined(AFX_STDAFX_H__4BC26E01_A411_43B7_9129_B453770CBE84__INCLUDED_) #define AFX_STDAFX_H__4BC26E01_A411_43B7_9129_B453770CBE84__INCLUDED_ #if _MSC_VER > 1000 #pragma once #endif // _MSC_VER > 1000 #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN // Exclude rarely-used stuff from Windows headers #include <stdio.h> #include <afx.h> #include "CloneGeneral.h" #include "BoostIInclude.h" #endif // !defined(AFX_STDAFX_H__4BC26E01_A411_43B7_9129_B453770CBE84__INCLUDED_) CloneGeneral.h #define AFX_GENERAL_H__F3520E35_333F_11D5_A855_000103C25D02__INCLUDED_ #if _MSC_VER > 1000 #pragma once #endif // _MSC_VER > 1000 //#define for if (1) for // TODO_PASSAGE_6.0_8.0 #define BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T // requis parce que BOOST_TT_AUX_BOOL_TRAIT_CV_SPEC1(is_integral,wchar_t,true) // est défini 2 fois sinon et ca ne compile pas. // disable auto-linking for Boost #define BOOST_ALL_NO_LIB #endif // !defined(AFX_GENERAL_H__F3520E35_333F_11D5_A855_000103C25D02__INCLUDED_) BoostIInclude.h #if !defined(AFX_SVBOOSTBIND_H__F3520E35_333F_11D5_A855_000103C25D02__INCLUDED_) #define AFX_SVBOOSTBIND_H__F3520E35_333F_11D5_A855_000103C25D02__INCLUDED_ #pragma warning(push,1) #include "boost/bind.hpp" #include "boost/signal.hpp" #include "boost/shared_ptr.hpp" #pragma warning(pop) #ifdef _DEBUG #pragma comment(lib, "libboost_signals-vc6-mt-gd.lib") #else #pragma comment(lib, "libboost_signals-vc6-mt.lib") #endif #endif // !defined(AFX_SVBOOSTBIND_H__F3520E35_333F_11D5_A855_000103C25D02__INCLUDED_)
participants (2)
-
Bruno Martínez -
Elisabeth Benoit