Re: new boost.jam prebuilt's are available
Toon, got jam to build from the latest CVS thanks but the libraries just refuse to build with vacpp. I started fixing some of the headers but have become stumped at these :- (this is just an excerpt) "./boost/regex.hpp", line 529.13: 1540-1628 (S) Every template parameter for a c onstructor template must be used in the parameter list of the constructor. "./boost/regex/detail/instances.hpp", line 104.10: 1540-0120 (S) The out of line member definition "boost::reg_expression<char,boost::regex_traits<char>,boost:: detail::allocator<char> >" of an explicit specialization should not use a templa te prefix. "./boost/regex/detail/instances.hpp", line 105.10: 1540-0120 (S) The out of line member definition "boost::reg_expression<char,boost::regex_traits<char>,boost:: detail::allocator<char> >" of an explicit specialization should not use a templa te prefix. "./boost/regex/detail/instances.hpp", line 106.10: 1540-0120 (S) The out of line member definition "boost::reg_expression<char,boost::regex_traits<char>,boost:: detail::allocator<char> >" of an explicit specialization should not use a templa te prefix. "./boost/regex/detail/instances.hpp", line 107.10: 1540-0120 (S) The out of line member definition "boost::reg_expression<char,boost::regex_traits<char>,boost:: detail::allocator<char> >" of an explicit specialization should not use a templa te prefix. Is boost completely broken on AIX vacpp v5.0.2? Jon. --- Toon Knapen <toon.knapen@si-lab.com> wrote: > You can find the new links in the CVS on the RC_1_28_0 branch. The difference
is that this time, they point to a bjam.gz (remark the leading `b`) instead of jam.gz.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
On Monday 13 May 2002 17:53, Jon Scobie wrote:
Toon, got jam to build from the latest CVS thanks but the libraries just refuse to build with vacpp. I started fixing some of the headers but have become stumped at these :- (this is just an excerpt)
Is boost completely broken on AIX vacpp v5.0.2?
I personally don't use boost yet on Aix but there's definitly some effort necessary to port boost to vacpp. But vacpp 6.0 should definitly give better results. toon
participants (2)
-
Jon Scobie
-
Toon Knapen