On Tue, July 11, 2006 01:26, Sebastian Redl wrote:

Ovanes Markarian wrote:

...

In my current project is a need to implement an optional type, this type is considered to be lazy. I am wondering why C++ or Boost do not offer this possibility.

In what way does Boost.Optional fail to meet your needs?

Sebastian Redl

Thanks for your reply. I will take a look at this class in a more detailed manner. I saw it already, but thought it is not what I need. After some inspection I start to realize, that it is indeed what I might need. Thanks again. With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian