Re: [Boost-users] Maybe a problem with boost::object_pool?
Thank you for your answer
Sorry about the wrong info
RedHat:
uname -a : Linux ejecxapeqdtmad01 2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue May 17
17:52:23 EDT 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
/etc/redhat-release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon
Update 5)
GNU gcc version: gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-52)
I'll try to update gcc and run the test again
Did you try to run the test and and crash the program?
Thank you
-----Original Message-----
From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org
[mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Caleb Epstein
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:51 PM
To: boost-users@lists.boost.org
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Maybe a problem with boost::object_pool?
On 8/9/05, Labour, Matthieu (MLPRO SF)
I use Red Hat linux 3.2.3-47
Are you sure that is the version you're using? That doesn't look like a RedHat version number. What does "uname -a" tell you, and what is the contents of /etc/redhat-release? I have: Linux scsefpldcs0213 2.4.21-27.0.4.ELhugemem #1 SMP Sat Apr 16 18:22:53 EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 4)
Gcc version 3.2.3 20030502
Perhaps the compiler is at fault here. Thats an old-ish version of GCC. I use 3.3.4. It could also be a buggy GNU libc or libstdc++ if you're on an older RedHat version. -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users -------------------------------------------------------- If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ --------------------------------------------------------
On 8/11/05, Labour, Matthieu (MLPRO SF)
Did you try to run the test and and crash the program?
Yes I ran your test program for quite a while with no problems, using your magic numbers of 9 and 20 threads. No crashes here. Have you checked the RAM on your machines? -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com
participants (2)
-
Caleb Epstein
-
Labour, Matthieu (MLPRO SF)