Hello, i have some questions:
1) Why min_element give me errors without BOOST_RANGE_ENABLE_CONCEPT_ASSERT
defined 0? Is it uses only for make error messages more readable? Is it safe
to define it to 0?
#include <vector>
//#define BOOST_RANGE_ENABLE_CONCEPT_ASSERT 0
#include
On 07/11/2012 03:35 PM, tolik levchik wrote:
Hello, i have some questions: 1) Why min_element give me errors without BOOST_RANGE_ENABLE_CONCEPT_ASSERT defined 0? Is it uses only for make error messages more readable? Is it safe to define it to 0? #include<vector> //#define BOOST_RANGE_ENABLE_CONCEPT_ASSERT 0 #include
#include #include #include #include struct foo{ int x; };
int main() { using namespace boost::adaptors; using boost::bind;
std::vector<foo> vec; auto rng = vec | transformed(bind(&foo::x, _1)); boost::accumulate(rng, 0); // ok boost::min_element(rng); // error }
2) Why only logical operators overloaded for boost::bind and arithmetic one are not? Is it safe to define it manually with BOOST_BIND_OPERATOR? The safest option would be to upgrade to Boost.Phoenix. It has everything that Boost.Bind has and more!
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
participants (2)
-
Thomas Heller
-
tolik levchik