Re: [Boost-users] boost/numeric/ublas/matrix_sparse.hpp does not play well with RICE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc221/dc2210406753d7be97b7150de2f087e0cbdee0be" alt=""
I have partially resolved the issue. I deleted all boost libraries and
headers from my machine and clean re-compiled and installed 1.43.
I can now compile with unordered_map successfully. I suspect the compiler
was using one version of the libraries and a different version of the
headers.
Unfortunately, I still cannot #include
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89590/89590d82cbe9918869d50d06c72e3afad4a31b25" alt=""
John O. Woods wrote:
I have partially resolved the issue. I deleted all boost libraries and headers from my machine and clean re-compiled and installed 1.43.
I can now compile with unordered_map successfully. I suspect the compiler was using one version of the libraries and a different version of the headers.
Unfortunately, I still cannot #include
while also including rice/Data_Type and rice/Constructor. The #undefs Steven recommended don't appear to make a difference.
Sounds like a loose macro defined somewhere in RICE. -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9ecd/f9ecdac30e0c31950c61129fa787ee2661a42e9e" alt=""
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:53 PM, joel falcou
John O. Woods wrote:
I have partially resolved the issue. I deleted all boost libraries and headers from my machine and clean re-compiled and installed 1.43.
I can now compile with unordered_map successfully. I suspect the compiler was using one version of the libraries and a different version of the headers.
Unfortunately, I still cannot #include
while also including rice/Data_Type and rice/Constructor. The #undefs Steven recommended don't appear to make a difference. Sounds like a loose macro defined somewhere in RICE.
Exactly as was thought earlier, hence why we asked if you can include the postprocessed file in your next email?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0425d/0425d767771932af098628cd72e2ccd4040cb8a0" alt=""
On May 21, 2010, at 3:49 PM, "John O. Woods"
I've included the current code below. It compiles perfectly if I comment the first line.
#include
#include int main() { return 0; }
What if you reverse the order of the #includes?
participants (4)
-
joel falcou
-
John O. Woods
-
Nat Goodspeed
-
OvermindDL1