[serialization]problem with tree-structure
Hello! I want to serialize a self made tree-data-structure. It consists of nodes which are conected via pointers to other nodes. I can serialize an object that contains only one of these nodes. But when i connect other nodes via pointers to that node i get a segmentation fault when i try to serialize that. I read the "Serializable Concept" in the Reference that says that it should work and i assume that i implemented the serialization-libary correct, because it works for a single node... I have no idea what can be wrong. So can someone help me please? I'm using the "libboost_serialization-gcc-1_33_1" libary and gcc 3.3.5 -- E-Mails und Internet immer und �berall! 1&1 PocketWeb, perfekt mit GMX: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/pocketweb
Without a failing test it would be hard to help. Note that one of the tests explicitly tests that serialization works for cycles of pointers so I'm fairly confident that what you want to do should work. Robert Ramey heinz meier wrote:
Hello! I want to serialize a self made tree-data-structure. It consists of nodes which are conected via pointers to other nodes. I can serialize an object that contains only one of these nodes. But when i connect other nodes via pointers to that node i get a segmentation fault when i try to serialize that. I read the "Serializable Concept" in the Reference that says that it should work and i assume that i implemented the serialization-libary correct, because it works for a single node... I have no idea what can be wrong. So can someone help me please? I'm using the "libboost_serialization-gcc-1_33_1" libary and gcc 3.3.5
-- E-Mails und Internet immer und überall! 1&1 PocketWeb, perfekt mit GMX: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/pocketweb
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Hello Robert Thanks for your attention. I read all about the test-library, but i'm not sure how this can help finding the bug. What do you mean with failing test exactly? -- E-Mails und Internet immer und �berall! 1&1 PocketWeb, perfekt mit GMX: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/pocketweb
It's my understanding, and I could be wrong, that a failing test case is one
where you expect failure. Testing only correct values or operations doesn't
tell you that the test succeeded, if you also don't test values or
operations you do not want to succeed.
In your situation, you might want to test a single node serialization that
should not work, and make sure that the test actually goes the way you
expect it too.
My apologies for butting in here, I'm rather new to this list and this was
the first thing I felt confidant enough in answering.
Al Bechard
----- Original Message -----
From: "heinz meier"
Hello Robert Thanks for your attention. I read all about the test-library, but i'm not sure how this can help finding the bug. What do you mean with failing test exactly?
-- E-Mails und Internet immer und überall! 1&1 PocketWeb, perfekt mit GMX: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/pocketweb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
participants (3)
-
heinz meier -
Oni Vagrant -
Robert Ramey