-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 12:15 PM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: [BULK] Re: [Boost-users] [BULK] Re: [BULK] Re: [Test] Asserting a failure Importance: Low

...

On second thought, why not just modify BOOST_REQUIRE?

What do you propose to modify?

One could use BOOST_REQUIRE *instead* of assert() or BOOST_ASSERT. But if they prefer keep using BOOST_ASSERT I could provide a handler.

Well theres no problem using BOOST_ASSERT unless they use it in their code for different reasons. For example they might use it to log in production versions of the application... I guess its not such a big deal if boost test defines its own handler if enable assert handler is not defined. I don't even remember where this thread started :)