ICC and _syn_lock bug again

As shown here : http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/06/138322.php There *was* a bug with intel Compiler and shared_ptr using the __sync_lock intrinsic. It has been fixed on ICC 9.x but today I tried to sue this with latest ICC 10.1.018 on ubuntu linux and got the very same error than in the original topic. Is there something I miss ? -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35

Joel Falcou:
As shown here : http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/06/138322.php
There *was* a bug with intel Compiler and shared_ptr using the __sync_lock intrinsic. It has been fixed on ICC 9.x but today I tried to sue this with latest ICC 10.1.018 on ubuntu linux and got the very same error than in the original topic.
With what version of Boost? -- Peter Dimov http://www.pdplayer.com

Peter Dimov a écrit :
Joel Falcou:
As shown here : http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/06/138322.php
There *was* a bug with intel Compiler and shared_ptr using the __sync_lock intrinsic. It has been fixed on ICC 9.x but today I tried to sue this with latest ICC 10.1.018 on ubuntu linux and got the very same error than in the original topic.
With what version of Boost?
Sorry , 1.36 -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35

Joel Falcou:
Peter Dimov a écrit :
Joel Falcou:
As shown here : http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/06/138322.php
There *was* a bug with intel Compiler and shared_ptr using the __sync_lock intrinsic. It has been fixed on ICC 9.x but today I tried to sue this with latest ICC 10.1.018 on ubuntu linux and got the very same error than in the original topic.
With what version of Boost?
Sorry , 1.36
This should be fixed in 1.37... can you try the beta? http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=7586&package_id=8041&release_id=635320 -- Peter Dimov http://www.pdplayer.com

Peter Dimov a écrit :
This should be fixed in 1.37... can you try the beta?
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=7586&package_id=8041&release_id=635320 Better late than never, the problem is indeed gone with latest boost
-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
participants (2)
-
Joel Falcou
-
Peter Dimov