data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7523/c75230e41db5814a2d6b347afe5268f35a88ecb8" alt=""
It seems clear that since each dimension of a multi_array can have (I presume)
extent up to numeric_limits
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29b4c/29b4cb84d65daf602dbd62fa55b215c9e098b3a5" alt=""
Hi Daniel, So far multi_array punts on this issue as well. Cheers, ron On May 3, 2006, at 3:16 AM, Daniel Mitchell wrote:
It seems clear that since each dimension of a multi_array can have (I presume) extent up to numeric_limits
::max(), size_type isn't always large enough to hold the actual size of the multi_array and multi_array::size() may overflow. I have a similar problem with some of my own code, and I'd like to know how the multi_array designers approached this problem--my approach so far is to punt the problem to my users. Thanks. D. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
participants (2)
-
Daniel Mitchell
-
Ronald Garcia