We do use the serialization library. What are the caveats to having 'wchar_t as built-in' off? Thanks, Lawrence -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Nat Goodspeed Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:48 AM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [bjam] Building boost libraries for Win32 withalldebugging info ________________________________________ From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Lawrence Spector Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:44 AM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: [Boost-users] [bjam] Building boost libraries for Win32 with alldebugging info I had built the boost libraries a while ago, using bjam.  It looks like all the boost debug libraries were built with Debug Information Format of "C7 Compatible (/Z7)" instead of "Program Database for Edit and Continue (/ZI)" and I'd like to rebuild the libraries with this option turned on. In addition, we're going to need "Treat wchar_t as a built-in type" turned off.  It defaults to on. [Nat] We don't use bjam, so I'll let others address your real question. But do you intend to use the Serialization library? If so, beware of turning off 'wchar_t as built-in'. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users