Re: [Boost-users] Announce: Boost 1.51 installer for 32/64-bit Windows now available
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/588e6/588e6a139fcfd8a626054d2512e68211261d5c8a" alt=""
2012/8/24 niXman:
Why not to add libraries for MinGW?
ping? -- Regards, niXman ___________________________________________________ Dual-target(32 & 64 bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64 bit Windows: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bef1/5bef166f92826327022dfc2a2aa1bb6149bdbf2f" alt=""
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:07:23PM +0400, niXman wrote:
2012/8/24 niXman:
Why not to add libraries for MinGW?
ping?
Which MinGW? mingw.org? TDM? Whatever is bundled with QtSDK? mingw-w64? If so, personal builds, released builds or automated builds? GCC or Clang? The variation in that ecosystem is great, unlike in MSVC-land where there is only one authorative source of compilers. If you're to ask for additional toolchains, I'd expect Intel to be the first one to appear. -- Lars Viklund | zao@acc.umu.se
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f603/3f6036f5529d7452afcdcb6ed5b9d616a10511e0" alt=""
on Sat Aug 25 2012, niXman
2012/8/24 niXman:
Why not to add libraries for MinGW?
ping?
Because demand is low, and because mingw users are generally more comfortable with the command-line tools required to build and install Boost from source. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost
participants (3)
-
Dave Abrahams
-
Lars Viklund
-
niXman