[function][lambda] Create a boost function to a bind functor
Hi,
I would like to create a boost::function to a lambda::bind functor such as
float fx(float a, float b) { return a+b; }
int main()
{
boost::function
a) You want to use _1 instead of _2
b) _1/_2 are in namespace boost::lambda
boost::function
Hi,
I can get the following code to compile and it prints
3 2
5
but I don't quite understand why it doesn't print
2 3
5
or how to get it to do so. I thought since it is binding 2 to _1, this
would bind it to the a argument.
#include
a) You want to use _1 instead of _2 b) _1/_2 are in namespace boost::lambda boost::function
f = boost::lambda::bind(fx,boost::lambda::_1,2); It is actually possible to use _2 but then the functor takes to args and ignores the first: boost::function
f = boost::lambda::bind(fx,boost::lambda::_2,2); std::cout << f(100,3) << std::endl; // returns 5 cheers
Arnaldur
Chris Weed wrote:
Hi, I can get the following code to compile and it prints 3 2 5 but I don't quite understand why it doesn't print 2 3 5 or how to get it to do so. I thought since it is binding 2 to _1, this would bind it to the a argument.
Calling bind( fx, _1, 2 ) with 3 will put the '3' in the _1 and pass the 2 intact, the result is fx( 3, 2 ). bind( fx, _1, _1 ) will call fx( 3, 3 ). bind( fx, 2, _1 ) calls fx( 2, 3 ). bind( fx, 4, 5 ) calls fx( 4, 5 ). Does it make sense now? bind is not an interpreter with a mini-language ("bind the second argument to 2"), you just pass the argument values, and _1 is substituted with the first input argument (3 in your case).
Yes,
That clears up my understanding.
Thanks,
Chris
On 10/19/06, Peter Dimov
Chris Weed wrote:
Hi, I can get the following code to compile and it prints 3 2 5 but I don't quite understand why it doesn't print 2 3 5 or how to get it to do so. I thought since it is binding 2 to _1, this would bind it to the a argument.
Calling bind( fx, _1, 2 ) with 3 will put the '3' in the _1 and pass the 2 intact, the result is fx( 3, 2 ). bind( fx, _1, _1 ) will call fx( 3, 3 ). bind( fx, 2, _1 ) calls fx( 2, 3 ). bind( fx, 4, 5 ) calls fx( 4, 5 ).
Does it make sense now? bind is not an interpreter with a mini-language ("bind the second argument to 2"), you just pass the argument values, and _1 is substituted with the first input argument (3 in your case).
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
It is binding 2 to the second argument of the function (which is b) but _1
to a which means
the argument you call f with is passed as a to your function. Hence f(3)
prints 3 2 and returns 5.
If you want 2 3 you need:
boost::function
a) You want to use _1 instead of _2 b) _1/_2 are in namespace boost::lambda boost::function
f =
boost::lambda::bind(fx,boost::lambda::_1,2);
It is actually possible to use _2 but then the functor takes to args and
ignores the first:
boost::function
f = boost::lambda::bind(fx,boost::lambda::_2,2); std::cout << f(100,3) << std::endl; // returns 5 cheers
Arnaldur
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
participants (3)
-
Arnaldur Gylfason
-
Chris Weed
-
Peter Dimov