On Thu, 29 May 2008 18:35:20 +0900, John Torjo wrote:

Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:

...

Hi Jeff.

...

When will a logging library make it out of sandbox and into an official release? Can we expect to get a logging library in 1-36 ?

Hopefully 1.37... :-)

There's a review of John Torjo's logging library scheduled soon (for the third time :-)).

Yup ;) I want the review to be held withing 2 months or so. So, we'll see - again ;)

Is 0.22.7 which was released on 3 February the version which is going to be reviewed? Or is it another version you are still working on? I ask as I started to use 0.22.7 and might be able to contribute to the review. :) Boris

On Thu, 29 May 2008 19:32:46 +0900, Sean Farrow wrote:

Where can I get hold of this logging library?

I got my copy from http://www.torjo.com/log2/. Boris

Boris wrote:

On Thu, 29 May 2008 18:35:20 +0900, John Torjo wrote:

...

Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:

...

Hi Jeff.

...

When will a logging library make it out of sandbox and into an official release? Can we expect to get a logging library in 1-36 ?

Hopefully 1.37... :-)

There's a review of John Torjo's logging library scheduled soon (for the third time :-)).

Yup ;) I want the review to be held withing 2 months or so. So, we'll see - again ;)

Is 0.22.7 which was released on 3 February the version which is going to be reviewed? Or is it another version you are still working on? I ask as I started to use 0.22.7 and might be able to contribute to the review. :)

Thanks! Basically it will be quite a rewrite - the interface will change *a lot* - should be a lot simpler to use. But it will reuse the good functionality found in 0.22.7. If you want to contribute, we'll definitely talk :) Best, John

Boris

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

-- http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert http://blog.torjo.com ... call me only if you want things done right