on Mon Jul 16 2007, "Dmitry Teslenko" wrote:

Hello! Are compiler requirements equal across all boost libraries?

Nope

I've tried to statically link against boost_regex, boost_signals and boost_filesystem and last one fails to compile saying:

/opt/boost_1_34_0/boost/filesystem/path.hpp:615: syntax error before `&' /opt/boost_1_34_0/boost/filesystem/path.hpp:617: `::basic_ostream' undeclared (first use here) /opt/boost_1_34_0/boost/filesystem/path.hpp:617: `Path' is not a class or namespace /opt/boost_1_34_0/boost/filesystem/path.hpp:617: `string_type' is not a class or namespace /opt/boost_1_34_0/boost/filesystem/path.hpp:617: `value_type' is not a class or namespace /opt/boost_1_34_0/boost/filesystem/path.hpp:617: using `typename' outside of template /opt/boost_1_34_0/boost/filesystem/path.hpp:617: parse error before `,' /opt/boost_1_34_0/boost/filesystem/path.hpp:619: ANSI C++ forbids declaration `operator <<' with no type etc ...

While signals and regex compile cleanly.

Does 2.95 gcc compiler supported? Thanks.

It is supported by some libraries -- mostly older ones. Many newer libraries are being written without support for nonconforming compilers that are over 6 years old ;-) -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com