Hello, We have the same problem in our project. The solution we have arrived at is: change "boost/serialization/hash_map.hpp" as below: //#ifdef __GLIBCPP__ #include //#else //#include //#endif and add the following lines to: "boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp" #define BOOST_HAS_HASH #define BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE __gnu_cxx This has been discussed before I think, although seems still to be an issue in 1.33 I believe. I think its due to the fact that there is no standardised hash_map map implementation. Hope that helps, Cheers Chirs Peter Lindman wrote:

Hello,

I cannot really get the serializations to work for hash_maps. Using maps, lists and vectors everything works just fine.

Using the sample code pasted below (using a hash_map) gives the following compilation-errors:

/usr/include/boost/serialization/access.hpp: In static member function `static void boost::serialization::access::serialize(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::archive::text_oarchive, T = __gnu_cxx::hash_map]': /usr/include/boost/serialization/serialization.hpp:78: instantiated from `void boost::serialization::serialize(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::archive::text_oarchive, T = __gnu_cxx::hash_map]' /usr/include/boost/serialization/serialization.hpp:121: instantiated from `void boost::serialization::serialize_adl(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::archive::text_oarchive, T = __gnu_cxx::hash_map]' /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: instantiated from `void boost::archive::detail::oserializer::save_object_data(boost::archive::detail::basic_oarchive&, const void*) const [with Archive = boost::archive::text_oarchive, T = __gnu_cxx::hash_map]' /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:243: instantiated from here /usr/include/boost/serialization/access.hpp:106: error: `serialize' undeclared (first use this function) /usr/include/boost/serialization/access.hpp:106: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.)

Changing the created class to "busmap" (based on std::map) everything works just fine! (The ONLY difference between the classes is the container-definition)

System specs:

Linux kernel version 2.4.26 g++ (GCC) 3.3.2 20031218 boost-1.32

Sample code compiled with: g++ -o test test.cpp -lboost_serialization-gcc-mt ==================================================

#include <fstream> #include #include #include #include #include #include <map>

class busmap { friend class boost::serialization::access; std::map bus_serial_map; // Imaginary bus-serial-number to bus number lookup-table; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & bus_serial_map; } public: busmap(){} };

class bushashmap { friend class boost::serialization::access; __gnu_cxx::hash_map bus_serial_map; // Imaginary bus-serial-number to bus number lookup-table; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & bus_serial_map; } public: bushashmap(){} };

int main() { // create and open a character archive for output std::ofstream ofs("filename"); boost::archive::text_oarchive oa(ofs);

// create class instance const bushashmap myBusMap;

// write class instance to archive oa << myBusMap; // close archive ofs.close();

// ... some time later restore the class instance to its orginal state // create and open an archive for input

std::ifstream ifs("filename", std::ios::binary); boost::archive::text_iarchive ia(ifs); // read class state from archive busmap myNewBusMap; ia >> myNewBusMap; // close archive ifs.close(); return 0; }

=======================================

Bug or my fault?? Can anyone help?

Best regards Peter

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.