Re: [Boost-users] WG: defining a function<>-object with a returnvalue of the same type (recursive declaration)

3 May
2006
3 May
'06
5:55 a.m.
Hmm - I would use boost::function instead of declaring a function-pointer object by myself. Regards, Oliver

3 May
3 May
1:26 p.m.
New subject: WG: defining a function<>-object with a returnvalue of the same type (recursive declaration)
On 5/3/06, Oliver.Kowalke@qimonda.com
Hmm - I would use boost::function instead of declaring a function-pointer object by myself.
Go for it. I just pasted the code from Herb Sutter's article that showed how to accomplish what you wanted with a function object and a function pointer. You could probably move that into a function<> if that's what you need. -Michael Fawcett
6956
Age (days ago)
6956
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Michael Fawcett
-
Oliver.Kowalke@qimonda.com